2018
enVisionMATH California Common Core

Kindergarten - Gateway 2

Back to Kindergarten Overview
Cover for enVisionMATH California Common Core
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Rigor & Mathematical Practices

Gateway 2 - Does Not Meet Expectations
50%
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
6 / 8
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
3 / 10

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten do meet expectations for rigor and mathematical practices. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for rigor by meeting expectations on giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. The instructional materials do not meet the expectations for practice-content connections by meeting expectations on explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics and partially or not meeting expectations for the remainder of the indicators in the criterion.

Criterion 2.1: Rigor

6 / 8

Rigor and Balance: Each grade's instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by helping students develop conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten partially meet expectations for rigor and balance. The instructional materials meet expectations for giving attention to the development of procedural skill and fluency and balancing the three aspects of rigor. However, the instructional materials partially meet expectations for giving attention to conceptual understanding and applications.

Indicator 2a

1 / 2

Attention to conceptual understanding: Materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten partially meet expectations that the materials develop conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.

The instructional materials present a Problem-Based Interactive Learning activity (PBIL) and a Visual Learning Bridge (VLB) within each lesson to develop conceptual understanding. However, the PBIL and VLB are teacher-directed and do not offer students the opportunity to practice conceptual understanding independently through the use of pictures, manipulatives, and models.

Overall, the instructional materials do not consistently provide students opportunities to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 5 Lesson 1, the Overview of the PBIL states, “Children will read and write the numbers 11 and 12 and identify or make matching sets of objects.” The Guided Practice section of the lesson states, “Remind children that there is a special symbol for the number eleven and for the number twelve.” Students then count a given set of pictures and trace over the given numbers of eleven and twelve. The directions for the Independent Practice state, “Children count 11 and 12 pictures and write the number that tells how many there are in each group.” Students do not demonstrate conceptual understanding of writing the numbers 11 and 12 independently. Within the Independent Practice, students count a given set of pictures and trace over the given numbers of 11 and 12.
  • In Topic 7 Lesson 6, the Overview of the PBIL states, “Children will join groups of connecting cubes to show a number story. They will write numbers to record each group and how many there are altogether.” In the teacher-directed PBIL activity, students use cubes to represent the number of boats from a given problem. The Guided Practice section of the lesson states, “Guide children to use cubes to show each group of boats and place them on the appropriate pictures. Then have them connect the cubes to find out how many boats there are altogether.” The directions for the Independent Practice state, “Children use cubes to show each group of boats. They connect the cubes to find out how many there are altogether. Children record each number sentence.” Students do not independently demonstrate conceptual understanding of adding groups as the boat pictures are given within the Independent Practice and is the same exercise as in the Guided Practice.
  • In Topic 8 Lesson 6, the Overview of the PBIL states, “Children will act out a subtraction story with counters. Then they will complete a subtraction sentence to show the story.” In the teacher-directed PBIL activity, students use counters to represent the number of puppets in all from a given problem. The Guided Practice section of the lesson states, “Have children cross out the puppets in each exercise and read each subtraction sentence with you.” On the student page, some puppets have a dotted X printed on top of them so the students can see how many are to be subtracted. The directions for the Independent Practice state, “Children write how many puppets there are in all. They cross out three puppets in exercise 3 and one puppet in exercise 4 and write the subtraction sentences. Ask children to read the completed subtraction sentences aloud.” Students do not independently demonstrate conceptual understanding of subtraction as the puppets already have a dotted X printed on top of them that the students can see. This exercise within the Independent Practice is the same exercise as in the Guided Practice.

Indicator 2b

2 / 2

Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: Materials give attention throughout the year to individual standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten meet expectations for attending to those standards that set an expectation of procedural skill and fluency.

The instructional materials provide regular opportunities for students to attend to the standard K.OA.5, Fluently add and subtract within 5.

The instructional materials develop procedural skill and fluency throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 7 Lesson 1, students use counters to act out number stories and complete addition sentences in the PBIL activity. The Guided Practice includes opportunities for students to practice addition within five by using counters to represent the given problem.
  • In Topic 8 Lesson 2, students use counters to act out subtraction stories and to find how many are left in the PBIL activity. The Guided Practice includes opportunities for students to practice subtraction within five by using counters to represent the given problem.
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 3, the Develop the Concept: Visual section of the lesson models the use of ten frames to decompose teen numbers. The materials develop procedural skill when showing how to use two ten frames to represent the teen number in two groups.

The instructional materials provide opportunities to independently demonstrate procedural skill and fluency throughout the grade level.

  • In Topic 7 Lesson 3, the Independent Practice section of the lesson provides addition practice problems for students to demonstrate knowledge of procedural skill. Students practice joining two groups of pictures to find how many altogether.
  • In Topic 8 Lesson 5, the Common Core Review includes subtraction problems. Question 3 states, “6 take away 4 is 2.” Students choose which picture models the subtraction problem.
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 4, the Independent Practice section of the lesson provides practice decomposing teen numbers. Students decompose the numbers seventeen and eighteen into two groups with one group being a group of 10.

Indicator 2c

1 / 2

Attention to Applications: Materials are designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics, without losing focus on the major work of each grade

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten partially meet expectations for being designed so that teachers and students spend sufficient time working with engaging applications of the mathematics. Engaging applications include single and multi-step problems, routine and non-routine, presented in a context in which the mathematics is applied.

Each topic includes at least one Problem Solving lesson that can be found at the end of the topic. These lessons offer students opportunities to integrate and apply concepts and skills learned from earlier lessons. Within each individual lesson, there is a section titled, Problem Solving, where students practice the application of the mathematical concept of the lesson.

However, the instructional materials provide opportunities for working with the applications of mathematics through routine problems within the Problem Solving lessons and the Problem Solving section within all lessons.

The instructional materials have few opportunities for students to engage in non-routine application throughout the grade level. Examples of routine applications, where a solution path is readily available, are:

  • In Topic 4 Lesson 10, students count on two more from a given number. Independent Practice problem 5 states, “Jacob sees birds in a tree. Then he sees 2 more. How many birds are there now?” All four of the practice problems have this same format.
  • In Topic 11 Lesson 5, students decompose a teen number into a ten and some ones. Independent Practice problem 3 states, “Write the numbers that complete the number sentence.” There are two ten frames shown with counters already in them.
  • In Topic 9 Lesson 6, students write two different number sentences that describe a given picture. Independent Practice problem 3 presents two yellow counters and seven red counters to students.

Indicator 2d

2 / 2

Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. There is a balance of the 3 aspects of rigor within the grade.

The instructional materials for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately.

Lessons included components such as Daily Common Core Review, Problem-Based Interactive Learning, Develop the Concept: Visual, Guided and Independent Practice, and Problem Solving. These components are designed to develop conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and application skills.

All three aspects of rigor are present independently throughout each topic in the materials. For example, in Topic 8:

  • In Lesson 1, students develop conceptual understanding of subtraction when using counters to represent a subtraction story problem.
  • In Lesson 3, students practice the procedural skill of subtracting when solving a story problem.
  • In Lesson 7, students apply knowledge of subtraction when drawing pictures and writing number sentences to solve story problems.

Multiple aspects of rigor are engaged simultaneously to develop students’ mathematical understanding of a single topic/unit of study throughout the materials.

  • In Topic 7 Lesson 2, students develop conceptual understanding of addition by using pictures to write number sentences while applying that knowledge to represent a given picture set as a number sentence.
  • In Topic 9 Lesson 2, students develop conceptual understanding of addition within five when drawing a picture to represent the problem, while practicing the procedural skill of addition when writing the number sentence to solve.
  • In Topic 5 Lesson 5, students practice procedural skill of counting objects while finding the group that has the correct number of objects that matches the given number.

Criterion 2.2: Math Practices

3 / 10

Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten do not meet expectations for practice-content connections. The instructional materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics, but they do not meet expectations for any other indicators in this criterion. The instructional materials partially meet expectations for identifying and using the mathematical practices to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade and assisting teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

Narrative Only

Indicator 2e

1 / 2

The Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout each applicable grade.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten partially meet expectations that the Standards for Mathematical Practice are identified and used to enrich mathematics content within and throughout the grade level. Overall, the MPs are identified and used in connection to the content standards, but the materials do not always use the MPs to enrich the mathematics content. In the materials, the connections between the MPs and the content standards are not always clear.

  • There are multiple places for finding the MPs in the materials: Content Guide in the Program Resources Tab, the beginning of each Topic, sometimes in the Math Background section within each Topic, and at the beginning of each lesson.
  • Within each lesson there is a check list of MPs, but not all of the checked MPs are explicitly labeled within the lesson itself.
  • In the Content Guide and the check lists, the MPs are labeled and addressed. Within enVisionMATH California Common Core Grade 1 lessons, the MP is abbreviated.
    • MP1 - Make Sense of Problems (not perseverance)
    • MP2 - Reason Quantitatively or Reason Abstractly (treated separately)
    • MP3 - Communicate or Critique the Reasoning of Others (treated separately)
    • MP4 - Model with Mathematics
    • MP5 - Use Appropriate Tools
    • MP6 - Attend to Precision
    • MP7 - Use Structure
    • MP8 - Check for Reasonableness or Make Generalizations (treated separately)
  • Lesson 16-3, page 307A, identifies MPs 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7. The Problem-Based Interactive Learning on page 307 is labeled with “MP7 Use Structure: Remind children to use attributes such as curved or flat surfaces to determine which three-dimensional (solid) figures can roll, stack and slide.” In this example, students are not engaged in MP7 because the teacher rolls the sphere and the cone before students have had a chance to search for themselves.
  • Each Topic has a list of MPs checked off if done within the Topic. Each of the lessons within the Topic has a list of MPs checked off if done within the lesson. If an MP is checked, there is not necessarily explicit instruction for teachers as how to use the MP effectively when teaching the lesson. In lesson 3-1, MP3 is one of six MPs checked, but MP4 has explicit directions for teachers within the lesson.

Indicator 2f

0 / 2

Materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten do not meet expectations that the instructional materials carefully attend to the full meaning of each practice standard.

The materials do not attend to the full meaning of three or more MPs. Examples include:

  • MP1: In Lesson 7-1, students solve the problem: “Danny is sitting on a bench in the park. Three friends join him. How can you find out how many friends are sitting on the bench in all?” Students do not make sense of the problem because the numbers are presented to them. Students trace the numbers to complete the problem. On the Enrichment Master, students record the two addends based on the picture given. The solution is given, so students do not need to attend to the equation, only count the objects.
  • MP2: In Lesson 10-1 page 194B, the teacher note states, “MP2 Reason Quantitatively: Children should write the number sentence and fill in the drawing to show how to make 13.” Students do not reason quantitatively because there is no context for students in which to interpret the number 13.
  • MP4: In Lesson 9-1, the teacher note states, “MP4 Model with Mathematics: Ask children how using red and yellow counters helps show different ways to make 4 and 5.” Students do not create equations that represent the arrangements of counters.
  • MP5: In Lesson 5-1 page 93, the teacher note states, “MP5 Use Appropriate Tools: Emphasize the importance of the ten frame as an appropriate model to think about the numbers 11 and 12 as 1 ten and 1 or 2 extra ones.” Students do not choose the tool to use in this lesson.

Indicator 2g

Narrative Only

Emphasis on Mathematical Reasoning: Materials support the Standards' emphasis on mathematical reasoning by:

Indicator 2g.i

0 / 2

Materials prompt students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten do not meet expectations for prompting students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

Materials have few, if any, prompts for students to both construct viable arguments and/or analyze the arguments of others. Students are not given problems that are conducive to public explanations of their solutions. Students are given guided practice to follow steps and then given individual work that imitates the guided-practice problems. On occasion, there is a whole-group discussion, but students do not critique the reasoning of others during the discussion. Examples include:

  • In Lesson 3-6, MP3 is identified, and the materials state: “Tell the story about Rosie again. Have pairs of children work together to practice writing the number 10 on the right side of the page. As they work, have the children ask each other questions about what they are doing. 'How many counters did you show? What number will you write?'”
  • In Lesson 3-1 page 48C, students turn over a card and count dots aloud. If the card matches a tag that the students have, he or she keeps the card. If the card matches the partner’s card, he or she gives it to the partner. Cards that do not match are put aside. Students do not have to justify how they know how many are on the card or decide if they agree or disagree with each other’s reasoning.
  • In Lesson 5-1, MP3 is identified, and students ask each other questions about their thinking. They are not asked to critique each other’s thinking. “Have pairs of children work together to complete the student page. Have children ask each other questions about what they are doing. 'How many counters did you show? What number will you write?'”
  • In Lesson 7-3 Problem-Based Interactive Learning, page 131A, the problem is modeled for the students so there is no opportunity for students to justify any conclusions they may have made, nor do they communicate with other students or respond to the arguments of others. In Whole Group Discussion, students label each group of boats with cubes. Direct instruction is used throughout the discussion. Students do get the opportunity to work with a partner, but they complete the page as the teacher tells number stories about boats on a dock. This is a missed opportunity to have students compare answers, explain them to their partner, and to critique each other’s reasoning.
  • In Lesson 13-4 Pose the Problem, page 251, there is a direction given to have students share their ideas about how they problem sort the blocks, but there are no questions for students to reason about other’s thinking during the activity. In the Extend section of this lesson, students are asked, “If there were a small yellow shape on the rug, would it belong to your group of yellow shapes? Why or why not?” The teacher is to look for the answer, “No, because it is not the same size as the other shapes.”
  • In Lesson 13-5 Problem Solving: Use Logical Reasoning, students examine four shapes, determine how they are alike, and think about a sorting rule. Guided directions lead students through a series of instructions, including coloring the shapes as students walk through the questions. Students do not discuss initial ideas for a sorting rule before completing the guided instructions.

Indicator 2g.ii

0 / 2

Materials assist teachers in engaging students in constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics detailed in the content standards.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten partially meet expectations for assisting teachers in engaging students to construct viable arguments and analyze the arguments of others concerning key grade-level mathematics.

The Teacher Edition contains a Mathematical Practice Handbook which defines each math practice and includes question stems for each MP to help the teacher engage students. MP3 offers the following questions stems: “How can I use math to explain why my work is right?” “How can I use math to explain why other people’s work is right or wrong?” and “What questions can I ask to understand other people’s thinking?”

The materials label multiple questions throughout the material as MP3 or parts of MP3; however, those labeled have little information assisting teachers to engage students in constructing viable arguments or to critique the reasoning of others. The information that the materials provide is not specific and are often hints or reminders to give students while they are solving a problem.

Materials provide little assistance to teachers in engaging students in both constructing viable arguments and analyzing the arguments of others.

  • In Lesson 1-3, there is no supporting commentary or questioning to assist teachers in helping students form or develop an explanation. For example, the question, “How can you use numbers to tell about groups of objects?” is an open question. Yet there is no guidance for the teacher for how to continue the line of questioning and launch a conversation about student thinking. “Peer Questioning: Have pairs of children complete the right side of the student page as you continue with stories about Tess. Have children ask each other questions about what they did. “How many counters did you show?” “What number is this?”
  • In Topic 8 Small Group Interaction, page 149, students repeat the steps that were presented in the Whole Group Instruction. There are no instructions for students to have dialogue in the lesson.
  • On page 150, the teacher is given directions for “Error Intervention.” “If children are unsure why they mark Xs, then explain that marking an X means taking away.” This is a missed opportunity to have students discuss the way that they would show taking away and critique each other’s reasoning.
  • In Topic 11 page 211, “Note about MP3: Communicate. Ask children to explain what the numbers in each number sentence represent.” This question does not have students construct an argument. The students discuss how to fill in a ten frame when making 14, 15 and 16. There is no explanation or justification needed, and students do not analyze the arguments of others.

Indicator 2g.iii

2 / 2

Materials explicitly attend to the specialized language of mathematics.

The instructional materials reviewed for enVisionMATH California Common Core Kindergarten meet expectations for explicitly attending to the specialized language of mathematics.

  • Each lesson includes a list of vocabulary in the Lesson Overview at the beginning of each lesson. The identified vocabulary words appear at times within the blue script that teachers may use, and the words are highlighted in the student edition.
  • Each Topic includes two-sided vocabulary cards in the Teacher Edition in the Printable Resources section. Each card has a word on one side and its definition and/or representation on the other. The Teacher Edition includes vocabulary activities at the start of each topic. For example, in Topic 1 Math Background Vocabulary, page 1F, “Number Match: Attend to Precision - give each child number cards for 1-5. Then call out a number 1-5. Have children hold up the number card for the number you called.”
  • Each Topic opener has a vocabulary review activity, and each Topic ends with a vocabulary review activity. In Topic 9 (More Addition and Subtraction), the Topic Opener on page 167 lists “My New Math Words as whole, part,and graph, with illustrations of what the words represent. On page 168 in Topic 9, the Vocabulary Cards activity directions state, “Cards can always be used as flash cards. Have children create large vocabulary cards with visuals to add to the classroom word wall.”
  • There are instances in the materials where the definition may be unclear for kindergarten students. For example, on page 267, “Find the square. How do you know it’s a rectangle?" Since the questions before and after this question address squares, there is no support for teachers on discussing the difference between squares and rectangles with their students. The Closing on page 268B states, “A square has four sides that are the same length and four corners. Remember that rectangles have opposite sides that are the same length, but squares have all four sides that are the same length.” This language indicates that squares are not rectangles.
  • Correct vocabulary is sometimes not used. Examples include: Same number as is used instead of equal, and lessons about Real Graphs are defined as a graph with real objects on it. (page 255)