5th Grade - Gateway 3

Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Usability
| Score | |
|---|---|
| Gateway 3 - Meets Expectations | 86% |
| Criterion 3.1: Use & Design | 8 / 8 |
| Criterion 3.2: Teacher Planning | 7 / 8 |
| Criterion 3.3: Assessment | 6 / 10 |
| Criterion 3.4: Differentiation | 12 / 12 |
| Criterion 3.5: Technology |
The materials reviewed meet the expectations for usability. The problems and exercises are developed sequentially and each activity has a mathematical purpose. Students are asked to produce a variety of assignments. Manipulatives and models are used to enhance learning and the purpose of each is explained well. The visual design is not distracting or chaotic. It supports learning. The materials support teachers in learning and understanding the standards. All materials include support for teachers in using questions to guide mathematical development. Teacher editions have many annotations and examples on how to present the content. There are answer keys for all the student problem sets, exit tickets, homework, and tests, including written annotations to show what student work should look like. In the teacher edition for each module, there is an overview section that has narrative information about the math content of the module. In each module, at the start of each topic, there is another section that gives a mathematical explanation of the mathematics content in the topic. There are a few specific descriptions of the coherence of the mathematics, however there is no discussion of the grade-level content's role in Kindergarten through Grade 12. Materials do provide information on connected content standards and pacing.
Eureka has a web page for parents that contains general information about the curriculum as well as a few informational videos. The web page also has a section called "Eureka Math Tips for Parents," which gives information organized by grade level and module. There is information about the instructional approaches and research connection in the documents called "How to Implement A Story of Units" and "A Story of Units: A Curriculum Overview for Grades P-5." Within the assessment criterion the materials only partially met the expectations.
There are no systematic ways to gather information about the prior knowledge of students, but teachers are offered support in identifying and addressing common student errors and misconceptions. Materials include opportunities for ongoing review and practice. While the summative assessments include information on standards alignment and scoring rubrics, the formative assessments do not include this same information. There are no systems or suggestions for students to monitor their own progress. In reviews for differentiation the marginal notes often suggest ways to support students as a whole and subgroups of students who might need extra support or those who may be advanced. This includes support for vocabulary, representations, engagement options, and materials. Application problems, problem sets, and homework are included in almost all lessons. These problems can be solved in a variety of ways. Students can choose their own solution strategy and/or representation. Suggestions are included for supporting ELL students and other special populations in order for them to actively participate. Notes within the lessons present the teachers a variety of options for whole group, small group, partner, or individual work. Materials encourage teachers to make home language connections and cultural ties to facilitate learning. The materials do not include a technology component for instruction, so this criterion was not rated. Overall, the materials meet the expectations for usability.
Criterion 3.1: Use & Design
The materials meet the criterion for use and design. The problems and exercises are developed sequentially and each activity has a mathematical purpose. Students are asked to produce a variety of assignments. Manipulatives and models are used to enhance learning and the purpose of each is explained well. The visual design is not distracting or chaotic. The visual design supports learning.
Indicator 3a
The design of the materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectation for this indicator by providing students with ongoing opportunities to practice previously learned skills alongside their learning of new content. These materials use problem sets and application problems to develop their understanding of new mathematics. These materials use homework, application problems and fluency sessions to practice previously learned concepts.
- Problems sets within the lessons include guidance on how to select and sequence the exercises.
- Fluency exercises within the lessons include guidance on the purpose of each activity allowing the teacher to determine the necessary activities for the students.
- "How to Implement A Story of Units" provides information for the teacher on the purpose for each lesson section.
- "The primary goal of the problem set is for students to apply the conceptual understanding(s) learned in the lesson." (page 12)
- "The bank of fluency activities for each lesson is intentionally organized so that activities revisit previously-learned material to develop automaticity, anticipate future concepts, and strategically preview or build skills for the day's Concept Development." (page 23)
- "The homework gives students additional practice on the skills they learn in class each day. The idea is not to introduce brand-new concepts, but to build student confidence with the material learned in class." (page 13)
- "A Story of Units doesn't wait months to spiral back to a concept. Rather, once a concept is learned, it is immediately spiraled back into the daily lesson structure through fluency and applications." (page 9)
Indicator 3b
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of this indicator by using intentional sequences in the design.
- Problem sets, exit tickets and homework relate to the mathematical concept developed in the lessons each day.
- Once a concept is developed, it is spiraled back into the daily structure within the fluency and application portion.
- The sequence of topics within each module is intentional going from working with a variety of concrete and pictorial representations to more abstract work with numbers and computation.
- For example, module 1 goes from decimals on the place-value chart to place-value patterns, then to rounding, and then to addition, subtraction, multiplication and division of decimals.
- Progressions are clear and obvious, as in mastering whole-digit operations before moving on to operations on fractions.
Indicator 3c
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of this indicator by providing a variety in what students are expected to produce.
- Students are expected to produce answers and solutions throughout the fluency sections and some of the problem sets.
- Students are expected to provide arguments and explanations within the problem sets, exit tickets and homework.
- Students are asked to provide a variety of mathematical responses.
- Arguments and explanations are the basis for the debriefing section of each lesson.
- The "Read, Draw, Write" procedure requires students to represent the problem in a drawing and make connections between the drawing and the equations.
- Throughout the modules and lessons students produce a variety of solutions, using concrete, pictorial and abstract representations.
- In Module 2, for example, students are asked to use place-value knowledge to solve multiplication problems (2.A.10); to write out reasoning why a strategy will or will not work (2.A.11); draw representations of multiplication, including ways to use the distributive property to solve harder multiplication (2.B.10); and to use an area model to solve multiplication problems (2.B.50).
Indicator 3d
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of this indicator by using manipulatives and models as faithful representations of the mathematics they are used to represent.
- The materials use a limited set of concrete and pictorial models throughout the program.
- Each module lists suggested tools and representations that apply to the mathematics in the module.
- An example of how manipulatives are used occurs in module 4, lesson 2, in which square sheets of paper are used to help clarify the relationship between fractions and division. Later, counters and drinking straws are used to further this understanding (4.C.4).
Indicator 3e
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations of this indicator by using a design that supports students in engaging thoughtfully with the subject.
- The visual design is clean and simple and supports students in engaging with the mathematics.
- There are no distractions on the student pages or teacher pages.
- Student pages contain only math problems and pictures/diagrams as part of the problems.
- The materials have very minimal pictures.
Criterion 3.2: Teacher Planning
The materials reviewed for this criteria meet the expectations by including materials that support teachers in learning and understanding the standards. All materials include support for teachers in using questions to guide mathematical development. Teacher editions have many annotations and examples on how to present the content. There are answer keys for all the student problem sets, exit tickets, homework and tests, including written annotations to show what student work should look like. In the teacher edition for each module, there is an overview section that has narrative information about the mathematics content of the module. In each module, at the start of each topic, there is another section that gives a mathematical explanation of the mathematics in the topic. There are a few specific descriptions of the coherence of the mathematics, however there is no discussion of the grade-level content's role in Kindergarten through Grade 12. Materials do provide information on connected content standards and pacing. Eureka has a web page for parents that contains general information about the curriculum as well as a few informational videos. There is also a section on the web page called "Eureka Math Tips for Parents" that gives information organized by grade level and module. There is information about the instructional approaches and research connection in the documents called "How to Implement A Story of Units" and "A Story of Units: A Curriculum Overview for Grades P-5." Overall, the materials reviewed include support for the teacher in planning and learning for success with CCSSM.
Indicator 3f
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by supporting teachers in using questions to guide mathematical development.
- Materials provide quality-suggested questions throughout the debriefing section of each lesson. For example, in module 4, students are asked, "Did you see other solutions that surprised you or made you see the problem differently?" and "Look at Problems 1(e) and 1(f). We know that 4 fifths and 1 seventh aren't equal, so how did we get the same answer?"
- Quality questions are also included in the concept development portion, application problems and problem sets of the lessons.
Indicator 3g
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by including a teacher's edition with ample and useful annotations and suggestions on how to present the content.
- The concept development sections include a sample script to help the teacher understand what might happen when presenting the material. These scripts can sometimes mask the mathematical concepts at hand, leading teachers to think that this script is exactly what should happen. A summary of the process and concept before the script would be useful.
- Within the lessons, aside from the teacher script and wording in the teacher directions, most lessons have pictures and representations with annotations, demonstrating the concepts pictorially for the teacher, to provide guidance about how to present the content.
- There are answer keys for all the student problem sets, exit tickets, homework and tests, including written annotations to show what student work should look like.
- There are also boxes in the sidebar of many lessons that annotate information about how to present content to students.
- There is a repeated process for solving word problems called the "Read, Draw, Write" approach, which the manual explains in the module overview.
The overview of each module has several suggestions for delivering instruction.
Indicator 3h
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by including adult-level explanations and examples of mathematical topics so that teachers can improve their own knowledge of the subject, if necessary.
- In the teacher edition for each module, there is an overview section that has narrative information about the math content of the module.
- In each module, at the start of each topic, there is another section of narrative that gives a mathematical explanation of the math content in the topic.
- These topic-level explanations and overviews include mathematical coherence within and between grade levels.
- "How to Implement A Story of Units" includes adult-level explanations of the models and representations used.
Indicator 3i
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the expectations for this indicator. There are a few specific descriptions of the coherence of the mathematics, but there is no discussion of the grade-level content's role in Kindergarten through Grade 12.
- There are explanations of the role previous content plays in each module. This is listed in the module overview in the Foundational Standards.
- "A Story of Units: A Curriculum Overview for Grades P-5" contains a description of the module sequence that includes the connection to the previous grade and the next future grade. No connection is made to other grade levels.
Indicator 3j
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 do provide information on connected content standards and pacing.
- Within each module overview there is a section called "Overview of the Module Topics and Lesson Objectives." It contains lessons broken down by topic and cross-references the standards at the topic level.
- This overview also lists the number of days for each topic, as well as the total number of instructional days for the entire module, including assessments.
- Lessons include a time frame for each activity in the lesson.
- There is a yearly summary of standards and pacing.
Indicator 3k
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 include information and suggestions for parents.
- Eureka has a web page for parents that contains general information about the curriculum as well as a few informational videos.
- The web page also has a section called "Eureka Math Tips for Parents," which gives information organized by grade level and module.
Indicator 3l
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 contain an explanation of the instructional approaches of the program.
- A section on the Eureka web page called "Reports" details key research reports on mathematics instruction and learning.
- There is annotation about the curriculum as it relates to these reports.
- Both "How to Implement A Story of Units" and "A Story of Units: A Curriculum Overview for Grades P-5" contain information about instructional approaches and research connections.
- The opening letter from Executive Director Lynne Munson addresses some of the research and philosophy behind the curriculum.
Criterion 3.3: Assessment
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the expectations for this criterion. While there are no systematic ways to gather information about the prior knowledge of students, the teachers are offered support in identifying and addressing common student errors and misconceptions. Materials includes opportunities for ongoing review and practice. While the summative assessments include information on standards alignment and scoring rubrics, the formative assessments do not include this same information. There are no systems or suggestions for students to monitor their own progress.
Indicator 3m
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 do not meet the expectations for this indicator.
- Foundational standards are listed for most modules, but there are no directions for using these standards to assess prior knowledge.
- There are not systematic ways to gather information about prior knowledge.
- There are no diagnostics included other than within the rubrics for the summative assessments.
- There are no module pretests.
Indicator 3n
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by including strategies to identify and address common student errors and misconceptions.
- Each summative assessment includes a chart showing "progression toward mastery" to help teachers with the coherence towards mastery.
- On page 13, "How to Implement A Story of Units" says this about addressing errors and misconception: "Distractors for such questions are written to illuminate common student errors and misconceptions."
- The student debrief section of the lesson is intended to invite the students to reflect and process the lesson. Strategies include partnering to guide students in conversation to debrief the problem set and process the lesson.
- The marginal notes often suggest ways to support students as a whole and subgroups of students who might need support. In particular, the "Multiple Means of..." notes tend to focus on student misconceptions.
Indicator 3o
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by including ongoing review and practice.
Ongoing review and practice is included within fluency section of lessons.
- Exit tickets can provide feedback depending upon teacher use.
- Review and practice also within the problem sets and homework that are included in every lesson.
- The summative assessments contain rubrics to provide feedback to the teacher and student as to a student's progression toward mastery.
Indicator 3p
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the expectations for this indicator. The summative assessments meet the expectations, but the formative assessments do not.
- For the Mid-module and end-of-module assessments, there are rubrics for scoring the items, as well as an answer key with sample answers.
- Rubrics and scoring guides are clear and helpful. Examples of student work receiving top grades on the rubric are included.
- In the "Progression Toward Mastery" section of the summative assessments there is a detailed rubric for grading student mastery from 1 to 4. If the student does not achieve total mastery (step 4), then the teacher can look at the next steps to see what or how to follow up with the student. For example, when a student's mastery is step 2, teachers can look at steps 3 and 4 to guide follow-up instruction.
Indicator 3p.i
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the expectations for this indicator. The summative assessments meet the expectations, but the formative assessments do not.
- Mid-module and end-of-module assessments align each item to specific standard(s).
- There are standards listed for each lesson; sometimes multiple standards are listed.
- There are no specific standards listed within the lesson exit tickets. These exit tickets could possibly include multiple standards.
Indicator 3p.ii
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 partially meet the expectations for this indicator. The summative assessments meet the expectations, but the formative assessments do not.
- For the Mid-module and end-of-module assessments, there are rubrics for scoring the items, as well as an answer key with sample answers.
- Rubrics and scoring guides are clear and helpful. Examples of student work receiving top grades on the rubric are included.
- In the "Progression Toward Mastery" section of the summative assessments there is a detailed rubric for grading student mastery from 1 to 4. If the student does not achieve total mastery (step 4), then the teacher can look at the next steps to see what or how to follow up with the student. For example, when a student's mastery is step 2, teachers can look at steps 3 and 4 to guide follow-up instruction.
Indicator 3q
Materials reviewed for this indicator do not include self-monitoring for students. There is one exception within the fluency sprints. Students complete the sprint twice with a goal of increasing their score on the second round.
Criterion 3.4: Differentiation
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the criterion for differentiated instruction. The marginal notes often suggest ways to support students as a whole and subgroups of students who might need extra support or those who may be advanced. This includes support for vocabulary, representations, engagement options and materials. Application problems, problem sets and homework are included in almost all lessons. These problems can be solved in a variety of ways. Students can choose their own solution strategy and/or representation. Suggestions are included for supporting ELL students and other special populations in order for them to actively participate. Notes within the lessons present the teachers a variety of options for whole group, small group, partner, or individual work. Materials encourage teachers to use home-language connections and cultural ties to facilitate learning.
Indicator 3r
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by including strategies to help teachers sequence and scaffold lessons.
- The lessons are sequenced to build from conceptual understanding, using concrete and pictorial representations to more abstract representations.
- The marginal notes often suggest ways to support students as a whole and subgroups of students who might need extra support. This includes support for vocabulary, representations, engagement options and materials.
- Lessons and mathematical topics are sequenced according to the CCSSM progressions of learning.
- A description of the module sequence and layout is provided.
Indicator 3s
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by including strategies for meeting the needs of a range of learners.
- The lessons are sequenced to build from conceptual understanding, using concrete and pictorial representations to more abstract representations.
- The marginal notes often suggest ways to support students as a whole and subgroups of students who might need extra support. This includes support for vocabulary, representations, engagement options, and materials.
- "How to Implement A Story of Units" describes a variety of scaffolds and accommodations (page 13).
Indicator 3t
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by providing tasks with multiple entry-points that can be solved in a variety of ways.
- Application problems, problem sets, and homework are included in almost all lessons. These problems can be solved in a variety of ways. Students can choose their own solution strategy and/or representation.
- The embedded tasks show the students multiple representations using drawings, charts, graphs, or numbers or words to solve.
Indicator 3u
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by including support for the English Language Learner (ELL) and other special populations in order for them to actively participate.
- Notes on multiple means of engagement give teachers suggestions about meeting the needs of ELL students. These margin notes include sentence starters, physical responses and vocabulary support.
- On pages 14-20 of "How to Implement A Story of Units," there are suggestions for working with ELL students and students with disabilities. Page 14 states, "It is important to note that the scaffolds/accommodations integrated into A Story of Units might change how a learner accesses information and demonstrates learning; they do not substantially alter the instructional level, content, or performance criteria. Rather, they provide students with choices in how they access content and demonstrate their knowledge and ability."
Indicator 3v
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by offering instructional support for advanced students.
- Notes on multiple means of engagement give teachers suggestions about meeting the needs of advanced students.
- The curriculum specifies that not all pieces of each section of a lesson must be used, so advanced students could be asked to tackle problems or sections that a teacher does not use for all students.
- "How to Implement A Story of Units" provides teachers with suggestions for working with above-grade level students (page 20).
Indicator 3w
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 meet the expectations for this indicator by providing a balanced portrayal of various demographic and personal characteristics.
- The names and situations in the story problems represent a variety of cultural groups.
- The application problems include real-world situations that would appeal to a variety of cultural and gender groups.
- There is a balanced approach to the use of gender identification.
Indicator 3x
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 include a variety of grouping strategies.
- Notes within the lessons present the teachers a variety of options for whole group, small group, partner, or individual work.
- There are opportunities for different groupings, however the fundamental model is "Modeling with Interactive Questioning; Guided Practice; and Independent Practice."
- There are also suggestions for small-group work within the differentiation pages of "How to Implement A Story of Units."
Indicator 3y
The materials reviewed for Grade 5 encourage teachers to make home-language connections and cultural ties to facilitate learning.
- There are occasions (mostly with Spanish) where students are encouraged to make connections to words in their home languages.
- "How to Implement A Story of Units" offers teachers this guidance: "Know, use, and make the most of student cultural and home experiences. Build on the student's background knowledge."
Criterion 3.5: Technology
Reviews for this series were conducted using print materials, which do not include an instructional technology component. Materials were not reviewed for this criterion.
Indicator 3aa
Reviews for this series were conducted using print materials, which do not include an instructional technology component. Materials were not reviewed for this indicator.
Indicator 3ab
Reviews for this series were conducted using print materials, which do not include an instructional technology component. Materials were not reviewed for this indicator.
Indicator 3ac
Reviews for this series were conducted using print materials, which do not include an instructional technology component. Materials were not reviewed for this indicator.
Indicator 3ad
Reviews for this series were conducted using print materials, which do not include an instructional technology component. Materials were not reviewed for this indicator.
Indicator 3z
Reviews for this series were conducted using print materials, which do not include an instructional technology component. Materials were not reviewed for this indicator.