High School - Gateway 2
Back to High School Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Gateway 2 - Partially Meets Expectations | 81% |
|---|---|
Criterion 2.1: Rigor | 7 / 8 |
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices | 6 / 8 |
Criterion 2.1: Rigor
Rigor and Balance: The instructional materials reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards' rigorous expectations, by giving appropriate attention to: developing students' conceptual understanding; procedural skill and fluency; and engaging applications.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series meet expectations for Rigor and Balance. The materials provide students opportunities to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding, procedural skills, and application, and the materials partially balance the three aspects of Rigor.
Indicator 2a
Attention to Conceptual Understanding: The materials support the intentional development of students' conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series meet expectations for developing conceptual understanding of key mathematical concepts, especially where called for in specific standards or cluster headings.The instructional materials develop conceptual understanding and provide opportunities for students to independently demonstrate conceptual understanding and most of the opportunities for students to develop conceptual understanding are located in the Interactive Student Guides (ISG).
Examples of the materials developing conceptual understanding and students independently demonstrating conceptual understanding include:
- A-APR.1: In the Algebra 1 ISG, Adding and Subtracting Polynomials, students compare the behavior of polynomials to integers under addition and subtraction and write a conjecture describing closure under addition and subtraction of polynomials. In the Algebra 1 ISG, Multiplying a Polynomial by a Monomial, students determine if polynomials are closed under multiplication by proving the product of a monomial and a polynomial is a polynomial.
- A-REI.11: In the Algebra 2 ISG, Solving Polynomial Equations, students use a graphing calculator to sketch $$f(x)=x^4-2x-5$$ and $$g(x)=-x^6+3x^2+3$$ and estimate the points of intersection. The materials state, “Explain the algebraic significance of a point of intersection on the graphs of f(x) and g(x).” Within the same lesson, students critique the reasoning of a student who claims two functions have no solutions due to no intersections and explain the reasoning behind their critique.
- F-LE.1: In the Algebra 1 ISG, Analyzing Functions with Successive Differences, students complete a table of values for a linear function, a quadratic function, and an exponential function. Students compare charts with other students in order to make conjectures about each function. Students “look for connections between different function types and their successive differences and successive ratios.” Throughout the lesson, students explain connections between the type of function and the model of the scenario.
- G-SRT.6: In the Geometry ISG, Trigonometry, students explore ratios in similar triangles by using Geometer’s Sketchpad. Students explain what they notice about side lengths when changing the size of the triangle. Students also examine two triangles with different side lengths and congruent angles to “explain why $$\frac{BC}{AB}=\frac{EF}{DE}$$. What does this tell you about any right triangle with a 37° angle.” From the task, students determine trigonometric ratios for right triangles with an acute angle.
- S-CP.5: In the Geometry ISG, Conditional Probability, students are given a scenario where event A represents owning a house and event B represents owning a car. Students must determine if the events are independent or dependent as well as compare the P(A|B) to P(B|A). After making the comparison, students must explain their reasoning using precise vocabulary.
Indicator 2b
Attention to Procedural Skill and Fluency: The materials provide intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills and fluencies, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series meet expectations for providing intentional opportunities for students to develop procedural skills, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters. The instructional materials develop procedural skills throughout the series and students independently demonstrate procedural skills across the courses.
Examples of the materials developing procedural skills and students independently demonstrating procedural skills include:
- A-SSE.2: In Algebra 1, Lesson 8-5, students rewrite quadratics into equivalent factored forms. Students use the distributive property and factoring by grouping in order to rewrite quadratic expressions and polynomials.
- A-APR.3: In Algebra 2, Lesson 4-9, students factor polynomials to calculate the number and type of roots and sketch graphs based on the zeros. Students also match an appropriate graph to a given zero.
- F-IF.7e: In Algebra 2, Lesson 6-1, students graph exponential functions and state the domain and range of the function. In Algebra 2, Lesson 6-4, students graph logarithmic functions independently. In Algebra 2, Lesson 9-6, students graph trigonometric functions after identifying amplitude, period, vertical shift, and the equation of the midline.
- G-GMD.3: In Geometry, Lesson 11-2, students calculate the volume of different prisms, cylinders, and composite solids. In Geometry, Lesson 11-2, Preparing for Assessment, students calculate the volume of various three dimensional shapes.
Indicator 2c
Attention to Applications: The materials support the intentional development of students' ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially where called for in specific content standards or clusters.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of students’ ability to utilize mathematical concepts and skills in engaging applications, especially when called for in specific content standards or clusters. Students engage in routine and non-routine applications of mathematics throughout the series and demonstrate the use of mathematics flexibly in a variety of contexts.
Examples of students engaging in routine and non-routine application of mathematics and demonstrating the use of mathematics flexibly in a variety of contexts include:
- F-TF.5: In Algebra 2, Lesson 9-6, students solve a non-routine application by writing a trigonometric function to model the movement of carousel horses according to a list of provided constraints. Students also consider how to make changes to their function if the characteristics of the carousel change.
- G-SRT.8: In the Geometry ISG, Angles of Elevation and Depression, students use trigonometric ratios to write a formula to calculate the height of a rock formation knowing the height of a geologist is 1.8m. Students also calculate the width of a lake given a helicopter with an altitude of 450 meters and two angles of depression.
- G-MG.2: In Geometry, Lesson 11-7, students determine a solid with the greatest density when given certain conditions. The materials state, “A cylinder and a sphere have the same mass. The height of the cylinder is equal to its radius. The radius of the sphere is equal to the radius of a cylinder.” Students determine the greater density and explain their reasoning.
- S-ID.2: In the Algebra 1 ISG, Comparing Sets of Data, students plan a vacation based on weather history. Students examine two charts showing the rainy days over a 10-year period. Students use the data to “determine the shape of each distribution and use the appropriate statistics to find the center and spread for each set of data.” Students provide advice on the better place to visit for vacation and explain their reasoning.
Indicator 2d
Balance: The three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. The three aspects are balanced with respect to the standards being addressed.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series partially meet expectations that the three aspects of rigor are not always treated together and are not always treated separately. All three aspects of rigor are present in the materials, but there is over-emphasis of one of the three aspects of rigor. The majority of the lessons in the materials address procedural skills and some address application. Students complete series of examples addressing procedural skills followed by an application. Students also complete Check Your Understanding, Practice and Problem Solving, and Higher Order Thinking (HOT) Problems. The ISG develops conceptual understanding and students also complete a practice section within the ISG focused on conceptual understanding.
Examples of the materials over-emphasizing procedural skills include:
- In Algebra 1, Lesson 5-3, and the ISG, Solving Multi-Step Inequalities, students write and solve multi-step inequalities (A-CED.1; A-REI.3). Most of the examples in the lesson involve procedural skills and, in the Check Your Understanding and Practice and Problem Solving, procedural skills are also primarily addressed with an application. In the ISG, students complete problems that develop conceptual understanding by justifying their steps, critiquing the reasoning of a student, describing a method, and explaining if the solution is reasonable.
- In Algebra 1, Lesson 7-5, the materials address graphing exponential functions and identifying data that is exponential (F-IF.7e; F-LE.5). Three of the four examples emphasize procedural skills and Example 3 is an application for students to graph and interpret. In Check Your Understanding and Practice and Problem Solving, most of the problems develop procedural skills and there are a few, real-world applications. The corresponding ISG lesson, Exponential Functions, states the objectives are “creating exponential functions to model relationships between quantities” and “graph exponential equations on a coordinate plane.” Students develop conceptual understanding in the ISG lesson by writing exponential equations, interpreting different parts of the equation, using data in real-world context to explain why an exponential equation should be used, graphing exponential equations, and interpreting parts of the graphs in context.
- In Geometry, Lesson 3-1, and the ISG, Reflections, students draw and identify reflections (G-CO.4,5). In the lesson, there are five examples, four of which emphasize procedural skills. Example 2 uses real-world context to minimize distance using a reflection. In the Check Your Understanding and Practice and Problem Solving, procedural skills are utilized in the majority of the problems. In the ISG, students develop the definition of reflection and the rules for mapping reflections through conceptual understanding and students construct arguments while identifying transformations that are reflections. The Practice in the ISG emphasizes conceptual understanding as students describe, critique, and construct arguments.
- In Geometry, Lesson 7-6, and the ISG, Parts of Similar Triangles, students prove theorems about triangles, use congruence and similarity criteria for triangles to solve problems and prove relationships in geometric figures (G-SRT.4,5). In the lesson, two of the three examples emphasize procedural skills and the third example is an application. The example problems address finding side lengths with one correct solution and answer. In Check Your Understanding and Practice and Problem solving, students utilize procedural skills to find the value of a variable (side length) in the majority of the problems. In the ISG, students utilize Geometer’s Sketchpad to investigate parts of similar triangles and find patterns, make conjectures, describe steps to be used in a proof, calculate, and explain their solutions.
- In Algebra 2, Lesson 4-6, students solve polynomial equations (A-CED.1) using procedural skills. Five of the six examples emphasize procedural skills and the sixth example is an application. In Check Your Understanding and Practice and Problem Solving, the majority of the problems require a numerical answer. As with each lesson, there are HOT Problems with five questions. In the ISG lesson, Solving Polynomial Equations, students examine a polynomial function in a real-world context, graph the function, and explain various aspects of the polynomial. Students use a graphing calculator to graph polynomials in order to approximate solutions. Also in the ISG lesson, students “explain the algebraic significance of a point of intersection on the graphs of f(x) and g(x)” and relate that to solving the equation f(x) = g(x). In Practice for the ISG lesson, students explain their reasoning, explain different methods for solving polynomials, and find two different equations given a graph.
Criterion 2.2: Math Practices
Practice-Content Connections: Materials meaningfully connect the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series partially meet expectations for Practice-Content Connections. The materials intentionally develop the following mathematical practices to their full intent: make sense of problems and persevere in solving them (MP1), reason abstractly and quantitatively (MP2), construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (MP3), model with mathematics (MP4), attend to precision (MP6), look for and make use of structure (MP7), and look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning (MP8). The materials do not intentionally develop MP5, use appropriate tools strategically, to its full intent.
The materials also contain misleading identifications of the MPs across the series, and due to these, 1 point is deducted from the scoring of indicator 2e. Examples of the misleading identifications include:
- MP1: In Algebra 1, Lesson 8-5, students factor polynomials, but they do not persevere, check answers with different methods, or determine if their answers make sense.
- MP2: In Geometry, Lesson 2-6, students identify which terms are accepted without proof. Students need to know definitions in order to answer the problem, but they do not reason abstractly or quantitatively.
- MP3: In Algebra 2, Lesson 2-1, students create graphs that represent scenarios such as the height of a baseball, the speed of a car, the height of a person, or the temperature on a typical day. Students do not construct viable arguments or critique the reasoning of others.
- MP4: In Algebra 1, Lesson 9-4, students use the equation h=-16t$$^2$$+24t, which represents the height of a soccer ball, to determine the possible answers for t if h=0. Students do not make assumptions or create a model for mathematics as they are given the equation and solve it. In Algebra 1, Lesson 10-2, students create dot plots, bar graphs, or histograms based on a given data set. Students do not analyze the relationships within the models or solve problems based on the models.
- MP6: In Geometry, Lesson 3-1, the materials state, “The image of a point reflected in a line is always, sometimes, or never located on the other side of the line of reflection.” Students do not attend to precision as they choose the correct word to complete the statement.
- MP7: In Geometry, Lesson 2-9, students calculate the value of x when given expressions of two corresponding angles. Students identify the angles as acute, right, obtuse, or not enough information. Students do not look for and make use of structure.
- MP8: In Algebra 1, Lesson 9-8, students select tables of data to best model exponential equations. Students select appropriate models instead of evaluating the reasonableness of their results.
Indicator 2e
The materials support the intentional development of overarching, mathematical practices (MPs 1 and 6), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series partially meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of overarching, mathematical practices (MPs 1 and 6), in connection to the high school content standards. The majority of the time MP1 and MP6 are used to enrich the mathematical content and are intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MPs.
Throughout the materials, the MPs are identified in multiple places, but there are examples of misleading identifications for each MP across the courses of the series. Examples of the misleading identifications are listed in the criterion report for Practice-Content Connections, and as a result of those, 1 point is deducted from the scoring of this indicator.
Examples of MP1 being used to enrich the mathematical content and intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP include:
- In Algebra 1, Lesson 6-4, students make sense of problems by writing a system of linear equations given a verbal description. Students persevere in order to solve the system of linear equations using elimination.
- In Geometry, Lesson 2-8, students make sense of problems and persevere by determining alternate ways for creating an equation of a line. Students calculate the slope of a line given points or a graph and students must determine if lines are parallel, perpendicular, or neither.
- In Algebra 2, Lesson 3-4, students make sense of problems to determine dimensions of different shapes. Teachers encourage students to check their solutions using different methods and determine if their answers make sense.
Examples of MP6 being used to enrich the mathematical content and intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP include:
- In the Geometry ISG, Symmetry, students determine which tiles have symmetry. Students communicate precisely by justifying answers using definitions of symmetry and students describe reflectional and rotational symmetry of figures. Students also attend to precision by using correct terminology to communicate the types of symmetry.
- In the Geometry ISG, Congruence, students determine if figures are congruent. Students “use precise language to justify your answer.”
- In the Algebra 2 ISG, Distribution of Data, students draw a histogram to represent data on the wingspan of insects. Students describe the shape of the data set and what it means for the data to be skewed. Students also communicate precisely to explain what the data shows about the wingspan.
Indicator 2f
The materials support the intentional development of reasoning and explaining (MPs 2 and 3), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of reasoning and explaining (MPs 2 and 3), in connection to the high school content standards. The majority of the time MP2 and MP3 are used to enrich the mathematical content and are intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MPs.
Examples of MP2 being used to enrich the mathematical content and intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP include:
- In Algebra 1, Chapter 8 Performance Task, students write expressions to represent different perimeters and areas of swimming pools, hot tubs, and lap pools. Students reason abstractly and quantitatively while computing both perimeters and areas.
- In the Geometry ISG, Dilations, students use a figure representing an architect’s plan for a bedroom where one unit is equal to one foot. Students enlarge or reduce the size of the bedroom based on given perimeters. Students also “write an equation that can be used to find the scale factor (x) of a dilation given any perimeter (y).” Students reason and make connections between the drawing and the physical dilation that will occur.
- In Algebra 2, Lesson 6-1, students reason to write functions representing situations. Students determine if the function represents exponential growth or an exponential decay, identify the growth factor, and graph the function.
Examples of MP3 being used to enrich the mathematical content and intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP include:
- In Algebra 1, Lesson 2-5, students perform an error analysis on the work of fictional students. Students determine if the fictional students are correct and explain any error in their reasoning.
- In the Geometry ISG, Proving Triangles Congruent ASA, AAS, the materials state, “Raj says that he can draw two triangles that have two sides and a nonincluded angle congruent and that the two triangles are congruent.” Students agree or disagree with Raj justifying his claim with the SSA Congruence Theorem and provide a counterexample to disprove Raj’s claim.
- In the Algebra 2 ISG, Designing a Study, students analyze a study on cat food and weight gain. Students calculate the mean weight of the cats and determine if the difference in weights is significant or not. Students construct an argument to explain their reasoning.
Indicator 2g
The materials support the intentional development of modeling and using tools (MPs 4 and 5), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series partially meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of modeling and using tools (MPs 4 and 5), in connection to the high school content standards. The majority of the time MP4 is used to enrich the mathematical content and is intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP, but the materials do not not develop MP5 to its full intent as students do not choose appropriate tools strategically.
Examples of MP4 being used to enrich the mathematical content and intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP include:
- In Algebra 1, Lesson 9-5, students determine the dimensions of a painting after it is increased in size. The materials state, “the increase in the length is 10 times the increase in the width.” Students draw a model or use an algebraic model to calculate the new dimensions of the painting.
- In Geometry, Lesson 9-7, students write the equation of a circle to represent different scenarios.
- In Algebra 2, Lesson 1-7, students model systems of inequalities by graphing in order to calculate multiple possible solutions.
Examples where the materials do not develop MP5 to its full intent include:
- In Algebra 1, Extend 3-7, students graph piecewise linear functions. Students do not choose a tool as they are instructed to graph the function using a calculator.
- In Geometry, Lesson 3-1, students “draw the reflected image in this line using a ruler.” Students do not choose a tool to draw the line.
- In the Algebra 2 ISG, Graphing Exponential Functions, students determine the year a painting would be worth $750,000. Students do not choose a tool as they are instructed to use a calculator to determine the solution.
Indicator 2h
The materials support the intentional development of seeing structure and generalizing (MPs 7 and 8), in connection to the high school content standards, as required by the mathematical practice standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for the Glencoe Traditional series meet expectations for supporting the intentional development of seeing structure and generalizing (MP7 and MP8), in connection to the high school content standards. The majority of the time MP7 and MP8 are used to enrich the mathematical content and are intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MPs.
Examples of MP7 being used to enrich the mathematical content and intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP include:
- In the Algebra 1 ISG, Solving Systems by Elimination, students explain two different pathways to solve a system of equations using elimination. Then students use one of the pathways described to calculate a solution to the system. In order to identify multiple solution pathways, students make use of structure to analyze the task.
- In the Geometry ISG, Dilations, students dilate a triangle using different scale factors. Students make use of structure to find patterns when dilating with a scale factor less than 1, equal to 1, or greater than 1.
- In the Algebra 2 ISG, Properties of Logarithms, students make use of structure to approximate solutions of $$log_{10}a=0.903$$ and $$log_{10}b=2.477$$ when given $$log_{10}2\approx0.301$$ and $$log_{10}3\approx0.477$$. Students approximate the solutions without the use of technology.
Examples of MP8 being used to enrich the mathematical content and intentionally developed to reach the full intent of the MP include:
- In the Geometry ISG, Angles and Arcs, students investigate the proportionality between arc length and the radius of a circle. Students calculate arc lengths for circles of different radii in order to generalize the relationship between arc length and radius.
- In the Geometry ISG, Similar Triangles, students solve equations for the scale factor in order to write equal ratios. Students “state a generalization based on your findings.”
- In the Algebra 2 ISG, Real and Complex Numbers, students use a calculator to find the values of (1+i)$$^2$$, (1+i)$$^4$$, (1+i)$$^6$$, (1+i)$$^8$$, (1+i)$$^10$$,(1+i)$$^12$$. Students also calculate the solution of (1+i)(1+i) without using a calculator. Students use repeated reasoning to generalize a solution pathway of (1+i)$$^4$$ without using a calculator.