6th Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 6th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Text Quality
Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to Standards ComponentsGateway 1 - Partially Meets Expectations | 86% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Text Complexity and Quality | 19 / 20 |
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence | 12 / 16 |
The Grade 6 materials partially meet the expectations of Gateway 1. The materials have an appropriate balance of text types and provide opportunities for students to engage with rigorous texts. Students work with annotating texts consistently, drawing their attention back to the texts repeatedly. While there are many structures in place for students to grow their learning with text-dependent tasks and questions (writing, speaking, and listening), there are missed opportunities in fully engaging with the texts themselves and engage in critical analysis of their content, themes, and topics. There are minimal supports for teachers to identify and redirect or reteach students who struggle with or misunderstand the rich content provided by the anchor texts. Text dependent questions and tasks are provided, but not supported comprehensively for those students who may need extra work to build proficiency.
Criterion 1.1: Text Complexity and Quality
Texts are worthy of students' time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students' advancing toward independent reading.
The materials for Grade 6 include high quality texts that will engage students at this grade level. Different genres and types of texts are appropriately rigorous for 6th grade students and are organized in a manner to support students' reading growth over the course of a school year. Students read a range and volume of texts in and out of class, although there are limited structures for accountability to identify if students comprehend the grade level texts. There are limited opportunities for students to practice their oral and silent reading.
Indicator 1a
Anchor texts are of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectations for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of careful reading. Informational texts are current and should be engaging to students at this grade level. Anchor texts are well-crafted and content rich.
Texts are of publishable quality and worthy of careful reading, and contain content that will engage a range of student interests. The reading selections include published texts, excerpts from published texts, and published authors. Texts can be examined multiple times for multiple purposes, such as building academic vocabulary and facilitating access to future texts. They offer personal perspectives on a variety of topics. The texts are well crafted, content rich, engaging, and avoid stereotypes and one dimensional characters. Texts in literature include characters who would be relatable to 6th graders from a variety of backgrounds.
Some examples of texts that represent the quality of the year-long materials include (but are not limited to) the following:
Unit 1:
- Langston Hughes, "Thank you, Ma'am"
- Excerpt from Sharon Creech's Walk Two Moons
- Sandra Cisneros, "Eleven"
- Isaac Asimov, "The Fun They Had"
- Walter Dean Myers, "The Treasure of Lemon Brown"
Unit 2:
- Excerpt from John Steinbeck's Travels With Charley
- Judith Viorst, "...And Although the Little Mermaid Sacrificed Everything to Win the Love of the Prince, the Prince (Alas) Decided to Wed Another"
- Hans Christian Anderson's "The Little Mermaid"
Unit 3:
- John Adams, "Excerpt from 'Letter on Thomas Jefferson'"
- Multiple editorials and nonfiction pieces
Unit 4:
- William Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew
- Lewis Carroll's " Jabberwocky"
- Paul Fleischman's "Fireflies"
Indicator 1b
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
Materials for Grade 6 reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards for grade 6-12, and therefore fully meet the expectations of indicator 1b. Included texts are of different lengths and different formats. They include poems, essays, articles, films, editorials, myths, novel excerpts, short story, memoir, biography, and autobiography. Over the course of the entire year, the program achieves a balance of the instructional time studying literary and informational texts.
Texts in this year of study include a variety of genres ranging from ancient Greek mythology to online news articles. In addition, materials call for the use of film and video clips as a means of incorporating a variety of media (for example, a clip from the film Up and a filmography of Temple Grandin are used in instruction).
Unit 1: Text types include poetry, film, personal narrative, novel excerpts, short stories, myths, and a picture book. Specific examples include (but are not limited to) the following titles and authors:
- "Imperfect Me" from Hormone Jungle: Coming of Age in Middle School, by Brod Bagert
- Flipped, by Wendelin Van Drannen
- "Thank You, Ma'am," by Langston Hughes
- Film, The Lion King
Unit 2: Text types include essay, memoir, biography, filmography, fairy tale, poetry, expository essay, and film clips. Specific examples include (but are not limited to) the following titles and authors:
- Excerpts from Travels With Charley, by John Steinbeck
- "Saying Farewell to a Faithful Pal," by John Grogan
- "Dogs Make Us Human" and "My Story," by Temple Grandin and Catherine Johnson
- Excerpt from "Chapter 6: Hampshire School for Wayward Wizards" from the book Temple Grandin: How the Girl Who Loved Cows Embraced Autism and Changed the World, by Sy Montgomery
Unit 3: Text types include news editorials and articles, historical primary documents, informational texts, and letters. Specific examples include (but are not limited to) the following titles and authors:
- "Don't ban peanuts at school, but teach about the dangers," by Des Moines Register Editorial Board
- "Should Dodgeball Be Banned in School?" by staff of TIME for Kids
- "Most Dangerous 'Sport' of All May be Cheerleading," by Lisa Ling and Arash Ghadishah
- "High School Football: Would a Pop Warner Ban Limit Concussions?" by Tina Akouris
- "Excerpt from "Letter on Thomas Jefferson'," by John Adams
Unit 4: Text types include articles, informational text, essay, short story, poetry, and drama (written and film). Specific examples include (but are not limited to) the following titles and authors:
- "Shakespeare's Life," by the British Library
- "Shakespeare Dumbed Down in Comic Strips for Bored Pupils," by Laura Clark
- "Reading Shakespeare's Language: The Taming of the Shrew," by Barbara Mowat and Paul Werstine
- Limericks from A Book of Nonsense, by Edward Lear
Indicator 1c
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
The Grade 6 materials meet the expectations for this indicator as the texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative and qualitative analysis and the relationship to their associated task. The quantitative measure of these texts vary from a 620 to a 1900 Lexile level. The qualitative measure tends to stay in the "complex" and "very complex" range. Qualitative measures in Grade 6 include an appropriate mix of low, moderate, and high difficulty. While the quantitative measurements of these texts vary above and below the grade-band Lexile limits, this variety is done with a purpose that is clear and appropriate for materials in a 6th grade classroom; the qualitative features of texts that fall above or below the text complexity band make their placement appropriate. Texts are thoughtfully paired so that a more complex text is supported by one less so, and tasks are designed to access more complex text selections.
Examples of texts that reflect the curriculum’s ability to meet the expectation of indicator 1c are as follows:
Unit 1: Six out of seven texts have an overall text complexity analysis of Complex, which indicates that they are in the upper range of the suggested Grade 6 complexity.
- Activity 1.5 - Text Title: My Superpowers by Dan Greenburg, Lexile: 1020 Qualitative:Moderate Task: Moderate
- Activity 1.7
- Text Title: excerpt from Kira-Kira by Cynthia Kadohata, Lexile:620 Qualitative: Low Difficulty Task: Challenging
- Text Title: "The Jacket" by Gary Soto, Lexile: 1020 Qualitative: Moderate Difficulty Task: Moderate
Unit 2: Five out of six texts have an overall text complexity analysis of Complex.
- Activity 2.15 - Text Title: " He Might Have Liked Me Better with My Tail" by Ima Mermaid, Lexile: 820 Qualitative: Moderate Task: Moderate
- Activity 2.20 - Text Title: "Dogs Make Us Human" by Temple Grandin and Catherine Johnson, Lexile:970 Qualitative: Moderate Task: Moderate
Unit 3: All texts are rated Complex or Very Complex in text complexity analysis.
- Activity 3.6 - Text Title: "Letter on Thomas Jefferson" by John Adams, Lexile: 980 Qualitative: Moderate Task: Moderate
- Activity 3.8
- Text Title: "The Pros and Cons of Social Networking for Teenagers: A Parents' Guide" by Kristin Stanberry, Lexile: 940 Qualitative: Moderate Task:Challenging
- Text Title: Social Networking's Good and Bad Impacts on Kids" by Science Daily, 2011, Lexile: 1490 Qualitative: High Difficulty Task: Challenging
- Text Title: "Pro and Con Arguments: 'Are Social Networking Sites Good for our Society?'", Lexile: 1590 Qualitative: High Difficulty Task: Challenging Activity 3.11- Text Title: "The First Americans" by Scott H. Peters, Lexile: 890 Qualitative: Moderate Task: Challenging
Unit 4 : Four out of six texts are rated Complex to Very Complex in text complexity analysis.
- Activity 4.3 - Text: "Shakespeare's Life" from the British Library, Lexile: 1010 Qualitative: Moderate Task: Accessible Informational
- Activity 4.6 - Essay: "Reading Shakespeare's Language: The Taming of the Shrew" by Barbara Mowat and Paul Wresting, Lexile: 1230 Qualitative: Moderate Task: Accessible
Most of the anchor texts for Grade 6 are on the high end of standards based quantitative complexity levels for sixth grade students. The task demands are frequently in the moderate to challenging range. For students who are struggling readers, the tasks present significant challenges, and the teacher may need to spend focused time assuring students are comprehending the texts to complete tasks.
Indicator 1d
Materials support students' increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)
The instructional materials for Grade 6 fully meet the expectations of indicator 1d, which supports students in growing their literacy skills so they can read and comprehend texts at grade level by the end of the school year. The complexity of texts students interact with in the core curriculum increases throughout the school year, which is intentional by design. By the end of the year, students encounter fewer texts with low text complexity measures and more texts with moderate to high difficulty. A variety of complexity levels is found across the school year.
Some examples of texts and tasks that are representative of students’ access to literacy skills over the school year include:
- Unit 1: Six out of seven anchor texts have an overall text complexity analysis of "complex," which indicates that they are in the upper range of the suggested 6th grade complexity in terms of quantitative analysis and qualitative features.
- Unit 2: Four out of five texts are ranked as "complex" overall, which indicates that they are in the upper range of the suggested Grade 6 complexity in terms of quantitative analysis and qualitative features.
- Unit 3: All texts in the Unit are rated "complex" or "very complex" in text complexity, indicating their level of rigor is high in a quantitative and qualitative measure.
- Unit 4 : Four out of six anchor texts are rated "complex" to "very complex" according to quantitative and qualitative complexity analyses. This unit includes a text by William Shakespeare, which affects the measures in its highly rigorous, antiquated language.
The work is rigorous over the course of the year as students work with complex texts and tasks. Close reading and writer’s workshops are available online to assist in providing access to rigorous texts. There are also opportunities online to listen to texts read aloud.
Indicator 1e
Anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.
The Grade 6 materials fully meet the expectations of indicator 1e. The core texts, and series of texts connected to them, are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purpose and placement at grade level. The publisher includes a complete “Text Complexity Analysis” for each text used. This document includes a text description, a locator for where it is used, a section on context, a chart of the quantitative and qualitative measures, the qualitative considerations, the task and reader considerations, and the placement considerations.
In the online Teacher Edition, a complete text complexity analysis and rationale for that text's inclusion in the program is available. Included in the text analysis is the following: a paragraph setting the context of the reading within the rest of the unit; a quantitative/complexity measure; qualitative considerations including purpose/levels of meaning, structure, language and knowledge demands; as well as task, reader, and grade level placement considerations.
In the forward of the print Teacher Edition, an explanation of the metrics used for text complexity measures is provided. Quantitative measures are indicated with Lexile scores. Qualitative measures are indicated as "High," "Moderate," and "Low" difficulty and were determined by teachers considering meaning, purpose, structure, language, and knowledge demands of each text. Task difficulty was measured using Anderson's and Krathwohl's taxonomy based on the cognitive demands of tasks associated with the text.
At the beginning of each unit, the Teacher Edition lists rationale for materials included in the “Planning the Unit” section through Context, College Readiness Standards, and Instructional Practices and Pacing. When texts appear to fall below the grade 6-8 level band, a rationale is provided for justification. In the Print Teacher Edition, Text Complexity Icons and information appear as sidebars alongside the beginning of all prose text in Grade 6 student and teacher editions.
Indicator 1f
Anchor text(s), including support materials, provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading.
Instructional materials for Grade 6, including the support materials for the core texts, partially meet the expectations of indicator 1f. The materials provide some opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading, but additional support is needed for students to grow their reading abilities with oral and silent reading practice over the school year.
There are many opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of texts throughout the year. Materials include a breadth and depth of text types. Students are instructed to self-select texts connected to unit themes and keep a reading journal to record connections to core texts and self-reflect on successful reading strategies, such as multiple reading for multiple purposes, rereading, thinking aloud, visualizing, chunking text, and summarizing.
Although access to texts is available, instructional materials do not clearly identify opportunities for students to build literacy skills to become independent readers of grade level material. Materials provide minimal explicit and systematic practice in both oral and silent reading across chapters/units and the whole school year. The only time students practice reading out loud in class is when given a difficult Shakespeare scene to perform in Unit 4. Struggling students do have the opportunity to listen to texts with Student Online Edition. The Online Edition also provides, with guidance from the teacher, four Close Reading activities that provide multiple scaffolding experiences in order for students to achieve skill mastery. However, most supports for students to build their oral and silent reading are limited to materials directed for ELL students. There are few supports for teachers to identify gaps in literacy ability and provide support for students who struggle with the texts and associated tasks. Close Reading workshops are designed to provide practice with and build the skill of close reading; however, they are used to support or extend instruction rather than as a day to day core component. These workshops are not built into the core instructional pacing, and as a result, not all students are guaranteed to be exposed to these workshops.
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
For the Grade 6 materials, questions and tasks (written and spoken) and their accompanying culminating tasks, are text dependent it in that they are anchored to texts throughout the program. However, there is little support for teachers to identify misunderstandings as students use these strategies with the texts. The core of many questions and culminating tasks focus on the skills instead of focusing on the content and meaning of the text. Speaking and listening activities are available across the year, but guidance and support of practicing application of the vocabulary and syntax is minimal. Writing instruction to guide students to navigate multiple types and genres in on-demand and process writing settings is robust, as is grammar and conventions instruction.
Indicator 1g
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The instructional materials for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations of indicator 1g that most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-specific and require students to engage with the text directly. The questions and tasks require the students to draw on textual evidence, but often focus on surface-level components as opposed to diving deeper into the meaning of the text itself. Teacher materials provide some support for the planning and implementation of text-dependent writing, speaking, and various activities, although many questions and much analysis done by students will need teacher support to ensure that students are gaining knowledge and information from the materials.
Following are some representative examples of how the Grade 6 materials employ text-based questions and tasks over the course of the school year:
Unit 1 :
- Students read the personal narrative My Superpowers by Dan Greenburg and analyze the sequence of events and cause and effect structure of the text. Support for students who have misunderstandings or miscue is minimal.
- Students read, "On Turning Ten" by Billy Collins and then complete this short series of questions:
- Describe the change the speaker of the poem experiences. Provide evidence form the text that supports your conclusion.
- What point of view is being used int his poem? How can you tell?
Unit 2:
- Students read John Steinbeck’s Travels With Charley and compare it with John Grogan’s “Saying Farewell to a Faithful Pal.” The expository writing prompt then asks students to incorporate evidence from these two texts to complete a written task. Samples/models are minimal.
- Students write an expository response to the novel Walk Two Moons, selecting from one of the following prompts:
- Explain how internal or external forces cause one character to grow or change
- Identify one subplot from the novel and explain how it relates to the main plot of the novel
- Describe one setting from the novel and explain why it is important to a character or to the plot
- Discuss how plot, setting, character, or conflict contribute to one of the novel’s themes.
Unit 4:
- In Activity 4.3, students learn about Shakespeare and his society. After reading an article/annotated timeline, they answer these questions:
- Look at the source of the informational text. Why do you think this source is credible
- Brainstorm how you could use multimedia to clarify ideas and add interest to a presentation of this information (e.g., graphics, images, music/sound).
- While these questions are text-dependent in that students must respond using evidence showing they've read the materials, they are not engaging students in reading closely. Instead, the questions and tasks are using the text as a vehicle to guide students to learn the skills of research.
- In Activity 4.14, students analyze and rehearse an excerpt from The Taming of the Shrew. After they read the selection, they are given these questions and tasks. The questions do support students' practicing speaking and listening about the play, but are more focused on the character analysis and given less support on understanding the content or theme of the play as a whole:
- Conduct a close reading to analyze your assigned character based on what the text says explicitly as well as what you infer from the text. Record your analysis and evidence in the graphic organizer [included]
- How does Shakespeare develop the point of view of each character in the scene?
- What is the theme or central idea of the scene? How does Shakespeare convey this idea?
- After working on oral delivery of scenes, students are to "write a summary of your interpretation of the scene."
Indicator 1h
Sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).
The instructional materials for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations for indicator 1h, as sets of text-dependent questions build to culminating tasks throughout the school year. Culminating tasks frequently integrate literacy skills (tasks may focus on writing, speaking, or listening) and provide students opportunities to demonstrate what they know and are able to do in speaking and writing. Culminating tasks are evident across the year's worth of material. The core of the culminating tasks focus on the skills and are not always text-specific, and students may miss the theme, topic, or message of the texts themselves as they complete the culminating tasks.
Following are samples representative of the culminating tasks in the Grade 6 materials. Skills development, particularly in writing, is strong, although connections to the texts studied are not always explicit nor robust:
Unit 1:
- Culminating Assessment 1.2 Write a short story. This culminating task is supported by activities that require students to use textual evidence in the analysis of characterization, story elements, plot elements and theme. Students also work to create text in response to various writing prompts and demonstrate command of short story techniques, sequencing and language. After analyzing short stories, students create their own.While this task is connected to the skills of the Unit, it does not explicitly connect with the associated texts.
Unit 2 :
- Culminating Assessment 2.1 Write an expository response to literature that addresses a given prompt. This task is supported through a variety text-dependent activities, such as the writing of paragraph responses to prompts, use of a double-entry journal to make meaning from text, close reading strategies and collaborative discussions about literature, and expository writing prompts to explain correlations of class novel examples of setting, plot. Accountability for comprehension is minimal, although the practice of synthesizing texts is present.
Unit 3:
- Culminating Assessment 3.1 Research and Debate Controversy. Students are supported to complete this culminating task through their prior selection of independent reading on a controversial issue, their identification of a writer's claim and reasons for or against a topic, and their practice presenting information and supporting evidence.
Unit 4:
- Culminating Assessment 4.1 Research and Present Shakespeare. Students are able to complete this culminating task through activities that focus on learning about Shakespeare and his plays. Tasks include debating about the importance of teaching Shakespeare in school, using evidence from text support a claim, analyzing information about Shakespeare and his society, analyzing quotes from various Shakespeare plays, and explaining language through writing and collaborative discussion.
Indicator 1i
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidencebased discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. (May be small group and all-class.)
The materials for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations of indicator 1i. The materials provide some opportunities to work with partners, small groups, and large groups to learn and model academic vocabulary and syntax, but guidance and support of practicing application of the vocabulary and syntax is minimal. Support to build students’ skills in speaking and listening in general is strong, but engaging students in academic vocabulary is not consistently clear across the school year.
Academic and content specific vocabulary is introduced at beginning of each unit and supported with definitions, although most vocabulary is focused on literary terms instead of content terms. There is little evidence of modeling and use of this vocabulary, except in sidebars titled Differentiated Instruction, that provides suggestions for accessibility to terms for English Language Learners. Struggling students are encouraged to use word map graphic organizers introduced in Unit 1, and available in back of text, as well as to write down unfamiliar words in Reading Writing Notebook. Examples of speaking and listening lessons and tasks that demonstrate how the program partially meets the expectations of this indicator include (but are not limited to) the following:
Unit 1 Activities include 1.1: Sidebar under Differentiated Instruction teach meanings of academic vocabulary to ELL students who labeled terms Q or H. If the students marked words T have them create word wall cards. QHT strategy introduced. Meanings for unit vocabulary given in sidebars in student edition. Teacher instructs students to apply QHT strategy to see which words the students know and which they need to learn more about. Later in 1.11, students who have marked academic vocabulary words with T are paired in groups to teach words to students who marked Q or H.
In Unit 2, Activity 2.8 suggests norms and rules for discussion groups as speakers and listeners. Roles of Literature Circle groups defined and assigned: Timekeeper, Notetaker, Task Manager, Referee, Motivator. Examples of leveled questions provided: Level 1- Literal Level 2- Interpretive Level 3- Universal. Graphic organizer introduced that sorts group evidence into point made and evidence provided. Class discussions lead to guidelines and norms for literature circles. The main focus of the instruction here is about the process, not about the content nor vocabulary of the texts being studied.
Throughout the year's worth of materials, academic terms are listed and defined in teacher/student materials, at the beginning of each unit, at point of use, and in the glossaries. In the beginning of every unit, the same teacher tips are given: "Use the QHT strategy for students to put a Q by words they don't know, a H by words they have heard. and a T by words they feel comfortable enough to teach to a peer." Students are encouraged to share their knowledge of words marked with a "T" with other students who have marked these words with a Q or an H, thereby giving students onus of their own learning. Word Walls and vocabulary flashcards are suggested, but there are missed opportunities to provide suggestions that encourage students to use academic and content vocabulary terms specifically in discussions or writing. The online School to Home vocabulary component has robust academic vocabulary practice that expands students’ vocabulary learning beyond the ELA classroom, but it is out of context from the daily lessons. Words practiced at home are not reintroduced in the classroom lessons.
Indicator 1j
Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.
The instructional materials for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations of indicator 1j. Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) but do not have consistent relevant follow-up questions and evidence. Speaking and listening work requires students to utilize evidence from texts and sources. Speaking and listening tasks and activities in the 6th grade materials include active listening, audience, choral reading, clarity of pronunciation and speaking voice, debate, philosophical chairs, drama games, expert group, eye contact, facial expression, feedback, fishbowl strategy, group discussions, inflection, jigsaw group, literature circles, movement, multimedia presentations, oral interpretation, oral introduction, oral presentation, oral reading, pantomime, props, rate, reader's theater, rehearsal, role playing, sound, tableau, tone, visuals, and volume. The index directs students to where they can find text references and instruction of speaking and listening skills.
Although each activity is intended to be anchored by the text, it is noted that there is little accountability for teachers to support students who either do not comprehend the material and/or who work with the speaking and listening activities without referencing the text. There is a missed opportunity here in that strong structures can be reinforced with more focus and support around comprehending the key ideas, themes, and topics provided by the texts themselves.Some examples demonstrating this indicator include the following:
- Unit 1: Activity 2: Students do an oral reading of a frame poem, paying attention to diction. The conversation focuses on the form of the poem and does not dive in to the content or meaning.
- In Unit 2, Activity 10, students work in collaborative groups to compare and contrast visualization of conflicts of two characters in film clips. Teacher supports to ensure students fully comprehend the characterization, plot, and themes are minimal.
- Also in Unit 2, in Activity 2.12 students will participate in structured, student led discussions, using fishbowl format and Literature Circle discussion protocols and strategies, creating norms and assigning roles. The main focus of these activities are skills, rather than focusing on the text itself.
- Some Unit 4 speaking and listening activities include:
- 4.5-4.6 Explain unique aspects of Shakespeare's language through collaborative discussion using appropriate eye contact, respond to questions as a speaker, take notes, ask questions as a listener.
- 4.13-4.15 Present an oral interpretation of a scene from Taming of a Shrew. Teacher support to ensure students are gaining understanding of plot, theme, and characterization is minimal.
- Embedded Assessment 4.2 Use a variety of physical elements ( facial expressions, movement ) effectively. Use eye contact, volume, rate, inflection, tone, and rhythm to demonstrate effective oral interpretation. Use punctuation cues accurately and consistently to inform vocal delivery. Again, the skills component is strong, although the text connection is less so.
Indicator 1k
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The instructional materials for Grade 6 fully meet the expectations of indicator 1k, as there is a mix of on demand and process writing opportunities for students. Each unit has a culminating activity that focuses on the steps of the writing process. Materials include writing instruction aligned to the standards for the grade level, and writing instruction spans the whole school year.
On demand opportunities include daily writing options in class instruction as well as opportunities in every unit to attend to the text at hand. Some examples representative of the program as a whole include (but are not limited to):
- Unit 1: 1.7 After reading an excerpt from Flipped and using a graphic organizer to prewrite about an incident in their life that was witnessed by someone else, students will respond to a narrative writing prompt that asks them to write about the incident in a way that shows the differing attitudes about what happened, making sure to establish the incident, create dialogue that incorporates the feelings of the characters, use descriptive language, and correctly use proper nouns and pronouns
- Unit 2: 2.2-2.3 Students are introduced to several expository writing prompts and practice writing paragraph responses. Students work with classmates to write a response to film clip UP that explains character's life changes in response to internal forces including a topic sentence that states the main idea, supporting details from graphic organizer, and commentary.
Process opportunities are woven throughout the program, and by the end of the year, students have had robust support in learning and working with the writing process. Multiple opportunities require short and extended research. Mode-specific Writing Workshops are in the online Teacher's Edition, which include open-ended prompts and Embedded Assessments with scoring guides to provide regular practice. The Student Edition includes writing instruction such as brainstorming, controlling idea, details, dialogue, drafting, editing, evaluating, feedback, outlining, planning, prewriting, quickwrites, research, revision strategies, multimedia components, writing process,writing prompts. The "Planning Unit" section of the Teacher’s Edition provides an explanation of expectations of Embedded Assessments, as well as a comprehensive Instruction and Pacing Guide. A Writers Workshop is available online for extra support.
Indicator 1l
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The writing tasks for students fully meet the expectations of indicator 1l. Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflects the distribution required by the standards for grade 6 over the course of a school year. Embedded Assessments (2 per unit) cover a wide variety of writing activities which meet 6th grade level standards. Some examples include writing a personal narrative, writing a short story, responding to literature, writing an expository essay, researching and debating a controversy, writing an argumentative letter, and researching and presenting written work on Shakespeare.
Writing lessons and activities that represent this distribution of text types include the following examples:
Unit 1: Writing instruction includes writing a personal narrative and writing a short story. Language and writer's craft instruction includes transitions, revising for transitions, vivid verbs, and varied sentence patterns.
Unit 2: Writing instruction includes responding to literature and writing an expository essay. Language and writer's craft instruction includes pronoun usage and agreement, sentence variety, revising for figurative language, and parallel structure.
Unit 3: ELA instruction includes researching and debating a controversy and writing an argumentative letter. Language and writer's craft instruction includes format style, using appositives, and revising by creating complex sentences.
Unit 4: ELA instruction includes researching, presenting, and performing Shakespeare. Language and writer's craft instruction includes choosing sentence structure and pronoun usage.
Indicator 1m
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
The instructional materials for Grade 6 provide frequent opportunities across the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply writing using evidence, fully meeting the expectations of indicator 1m. Writing opportunities are developed from reading closely and working with sources.
Evidence-based responses are required as follow up activities for all reading selections. Materials provide frequent opportunities throughout the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply their new knowledge in writing. Writing tasks often reference the reading content and mode in which the reading was presented. As students study a text for form and content, students are provided prompts and guidance to identify the components and then practice replicating or analyzing those components.
Across the consumable Student Edition, there are graphic organizers and note-taking prompts to assist students in producing writing associated with the texts being read. Prompts include questions that are dependent to the text, but used with multiple texts as well as text-specific writing demands. In the sidebars of the student consumable, students are provided organized space and guidance to annotate, and collect evidence to use in the writing tasks at the ends of each text and/or section. This progression of working from reading to note-taking to organizer to frame to writing is common throughout the program.
Most writing tasks explicitly require students to cite components as students write, even in low-stakes annotations and note taking that occur almost daily. Cues such as "record evidence" and "cite phrases" occur throughout to build students' habits of going back to the text. Some representative examples of how the program does this include (but are not limited to) the following examples:
- In Unit I, in 1.4-1.7, students "record evidence of setting, character, conflict, and dialogue from film and personal narratives" as they engage with them.
- Unit 2 Activities include using a double entry journal as a primary tool for identifying relevant textual evidence on characterization, plot and subplot, and setting (2.4-2.7), addressing Response to Literature prompts (Embedded Assessment 2.1), and practice writing an expository essay that incorporates examples from text and research to support a thesis (2.16-2.17).
- In Unit 4, Embedded Assessment 4.1, students support a focused main idea with relevant descriptions, facts, and details from a variety of sources, including a complete and accurate bibliography or works cited page.
Indicator 1n
Materials include explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.
The instructional materials for Grade 6 meet the expectations of indicator 1n, regarding the instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level. Language skills are taught explicitly and then applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts. Language skills addressed in the materials include active voice, adjectives, adverbs, appositives, clauses, conjunctions, dependent markers, parallel structure/parallelism, phrases, pronouns, punctuation (commas, dashes, exclamation marks, periods, quotation marks, semicolon), repetition, sentence variety, sentences, series, and verbs.
Grammar and conventions are taught in a sequence consistent with the demands of grade 6 standards and are integrated with reading and writing instruction. Language standards for the grade level are found in forward of Student Edition. The Student Edition has a comprehensive grammar handbook in the back of the book for continual reference, as well as an Index of Language Skills identifying where instruction can be found in text. This handbook can also be found in both the Student and Teacher online editions. The Teacher Resources Online also have additional grammar lessons. In addition, there are ten separate Writer's Workshops online that incorporate grammar and language instruction. The Planning the Unit section at the beginning of each unit, in Teacher's Print Edition, lists expectations for Embedded Assessments as well as a comprehensive Instructional Activity and Pacing Guide that provides grammar support and instruction in the context of actual reading and writing.
Samples of activities and lessons that show evidence of this indicator include the following:
Unit 1 Activities
- 1.4-1.7 Practice command of conventions through Language and Writer's Craft lesson on pronouns.
- 1.8-1.10 Language and Writer's Craft focus on using transitions.
- 1.15-1.17 Language and Writer's Craft lesson supports students' use of varied sentence patterns to add variety and interest to writing.
- Embedded Assessment 1.2: Write a Short Story: Use a variety of transitions. Use precise words and sensory details (vivid verbs, figurative language). Demonstrate command of pronoun use, sentence variety, dialogue punctuation.
Unit 2 Activities
- 2.2-2.3 Language and Writer's Craft lessons teach students to use appropriate verb tenses
- 2.4-2.7 Continued writing practice gives students opportunities to use appropriate transitions, and demonstrate correct verb tense and pronoun use. Lessons on sentence variety show students how to revise using compound sentences.
- 2.8-2.11 Language and Writer's Craft lessons revisit specific figurative language techniques from Unit 1.
- Embedded Assessment 2.1 Write a Response to Literature: Use a variety of transitions and topic sentences to create coherence. Use precise, accurate diction to illustrate the topic and demonstrate command of parallel structures, commas in a series, and semicolons.
- 2.16-2.17 As modeled in Language and Writer's Craft lesson on parallel structures, students compose sentences, paying attention to variety.
Unit 3 Activities
- Embedded Assessment 3.1 Research and Debate a Controversy: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English.
- 3.11-3.13 Language and Writer's Craft lesson on using appositives as an effective way to cite sources
- 3.14-3.15 Students draft and revise writing by using transitions and creating complex sentences.
- Embedded Assessment 3.2 Write an Argumentative Letter: Use a variety of transitions, persuasive and connotative diction and demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English.
Unit 4 Activities
- 4.3-4.4 In the Language and Writer's Craft lessons, students continue to practice using a variety of sentence structures as they collaboratively write an explanation of information gained from research
- Embedded Assessment 4.1 Research and Present a Portrait of Shakespeare. Maintain appropriate style and tone, consistently use academic and literary vocabulary. Demonstrate a command of the conventions of standard English, including a variety of syntax.
- 4.9-4.10 Attention to correct pronoun usage is revisited and reinforced through Language and Writer's Craft lessons.
- Embedded Assessment 4.2 Perform Shakespeare. Use punctuation cues ( periods, commas, semicolons, dashes, exclamation points) accurately and consistently to inform vocal delivery.