6th to 8th Grade - Gateway 2
Back to 6th to 8th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Comprehension
Comprehension Through Texts, Questions, and TasksGateway 2 - Meets Expectations | 91% |
|---|---|
Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Text Complexity | 14 / 14 |
Criterion 2.2: Knowledge Building Through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension | 37 / 42 |
The myPerspectives materials meet expectations for Gateway 2: Comprehension Through Texts, Questions, and Tasks. The curriculum offers engaging, content-rich texts across genres with appropriate complexity, supported by thorough analyses and scaffolds, and organized around coherent themes that build knowledge and culminate in Performance-Based Assessments. However, the imbalance between informational and literary texts and the emphasis on short-form texts limit sustained engagement, though most texts are presented in full. The instructional design is research-based and integrates reading, writing, speaking, and listening, with strong support for vocabulary, grammar, and evidence-based writing. Students regularly engage in writing and discussion tasks tied to texts. Writing process instruction at the paragraph level is lacking, outside of multi-paragraph assignments. While research tasks are present, explicit instruction in research skills is limited, and pacing guidance is insufficient given the volume of content. Formative and summative assessments are embedded, though teacher guidance on evaluating student work could be improved. Overall, the materials support literacy development but require stronger guidance in discussion facilitation, paragraph-level writing instruction, pacing, and research instruction.
Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Text Complexity
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include content-rich, engaging texts that meet the text complexity criteria for the grade level. Texts and text sets cohesively work together to build knowledge of specific topics and/or content themes.
The myPerspectives materials meet expectations for Criterion 2.1: Text Quality and Complexity. The program features engaging and content-rich texts across various genres and themes, with structured support for independent reading and thematic book clubs. Core texts are appropriately complex for each grade level, supported by thorough quantitative and qualitative text complexity analyses and scaffolds aligned to each text’s specific challenges. Text sets are coherently organized around grade-appropriate themes that build knowledge across disciplines and culminate in Performance-Based Assessments. However, the balance of informational to literary texts does not meet grade-level standards, and the emphasis on short-form texts limits opportunities for deeper reading experiences, though most texts are presented in full. Additionally, while the texts reflect diverse perspectives and encourage student connection, teacher guidance for facilitating discussions around complex topics is not consistently robust.
Indicator 2a
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading through content-rich and engaging texts.
The text quality and volume of reading in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2a. The program provides an engaging text selection with diverse subgenres and themes. However, the balance of informational to literary texts does not align with grade-level standards. While its short-form texts ensure a significant reading volume, the limited inclusion of long-form texts may restrict opportunities for deeper, sustained engagement. Most texts are taught in their entirety, with a few excerpts included throughout the program. The materials include an independent learning component in each unit, which provides students with choice in selecting, reading, and analyzing texts that are thematically and/or topically aligned to the unit. In addition, the program provides book club options with novels aligned to each unit, with built-in analysis questions for student accountability.
Materials do not reflect the balance of informational and literary texts required by the grade-level standards (55/45 in 6-8), including various subgenres. (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring.) Materials include a range of full texts and excerpts (including long-form and short-form texts), depending on their stated purpose. (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring.)
In Grade 6, materials reflect a balance of 37/63, informational to literary texts, which does not reflect the 55/45 balance required by the grade-level standards.
The materials include 30 core texts, 11 of which are informational texts and 19 of which are literary texts.
Texts include the following subgenres: memoir, poetry, article, short story, drama, biography, and graphic novel.
In Grade 6, materials include 22 full texts and eight excerpts.
In Grade 6, materials include 29 short-form texts and one long-form text.
In Grade 7, materials reflect a balance of 46/54, informational to literary texts, which does not reflect the 55/45 balance required by the grade-level standards.
The materials include 39 core texts, 18 of which are informational texts and 21 of which are literary texts.
Texts include the following subgenres: short story, poetry, article, memoir, interview, essay, drama, novel, video, and image gallery.
In Grade 7, materials include 34 full texts and five excerpts.
In Grade 7, materials include 37 short-form texts and two long-form texts.
In Grade 8, materials reflect a balance of 48/52, informational to literary texts, which does not reflect the 55/45 balance required by the grade-level standards.
The materials include 31 core texts, 15 of which are informational texts and 16 of which are literary texts.
Texts include the following subgenres: short story, article, poetry, essay, speech, drama, memoir, novel, infographic, and video.
In Grade 8, materials include 26 full texts and five excerpts.
In Grade 8, materials include 30 short-form texts and one long-form text.
The publisher provides a clear rationale for why each excerpted text was not selected in its entirety. For example, in grade 6, students read an excerpt from Jane Goodall’s My Life With Chimpanzees. The publisher provides the following rationale for why the text was excerpted: “This section of Goodall’s full-length memoir reads as a complete text, and, aside from its final paragraph, appears in its entirety. This text enables sixth-graders to learn of Goodall’s first encounters with the chimps, without imposing a large reading demand.”
Materials include core/anchor texts that are well-crafted, content-rich, and engaging for students at their grade level.
The myPerspectives curriculum for Grades 6-8 includes well-crafted, content-rich texts that provide a balanced mix of literary and informational works across various subgenres. Literary texts include short stories, poetry, dramas, novels, and graphic novels, while informational texts encompass articles, essays, speeches, and infographics with a focus on science, history, and the environment. The program features works by widely respected authors and presents age-appropriate themes that engage students at each grade level. Texts are selected for their strong themes, clear character development, and diverse structures, and they incorporate rich vocabulary and complex syntax, enhancing students’ comprehension and analytical skills.
Grade 6 materials include texts on childhood, animals, technology, community, and adventure, which will engage 6th-grade students.
Grade 7 materials include texts on relationships, space exploration, the human experience, environmentalism, and overcoming challenges, which will engage 7th-grade students.
Grade 8 materials include texts on young adulthood, coming of age, resilience, intelligence, and innovation, which will engage 8th-grade students.
Throughout the materials, texts are content-rich, well-crafted, and worthy of student analysis.
In Grade 8, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Medicine Bag” by Virginia Driving Hawk Sneve. In this story, the author uses rich figurative language, dialogue, and short, direct sentence structure to convey information about the characters and develop the story’s theme.
Materials include sufficient teacher guidance (including monitoring and feedback) and student accountability structures for independent reading (e.g., independent reading procedures, proposed schedule, tracking system for independent reading). (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring.)
Each unit includes an Independent Learning component. This part of the unit presents students with text selection choices as they read and analyze texts that are thematically and/or topically related to the unit’s learning.
The Savvas Realize platform includes a Digital Library. This library includes book club guides with texts aligned to each unit. The site provides the following description: “Book Club novels are optional and aligned to the grade-level units. The Study Guides include support for launching the Book Club, reading comprehension strategies, comprehension questions, discussion prompts, and projects. These resources must be assigned for students to access.”
Each Book Club Guide includes student-facing guidance on how to run their book club effectively, chunked reading assignments with guiding discussion questions for accountability, project ideas, and a book club reflection section. The Teacher-Facing Book Club guidance includes sample responses for all questions and tasks that students complete in each book club. There is no proposed book club schedule provided.
In addition to book clubs, the Savvas Realize Digital Library includes a Background Connections section, which provides short informational texts, over 100 digital novels, over 100 additional texts in the Extra Reads section, a Shakespeare Shelf, a Spanish Library, a World History Library, and Reading Guides for popular novels.
Indicator 2b
Core/Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to documented quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
The text complexity analysis in the myPerspectives materials meets expectations for indicator 2b. The curriculum provides comprehensive text complexity analysis for all core texts, including quantitative (Lexile and word count) and qualitative measures (meaning/purpose, text structure, language clarity, and knowledge demands). These qualitative measures are represented on a scale from slightly to exceedingly complex. Each Teacher Edition includes a rationale for educational purpose and grade-level placement. Core texts are appropriately complex for each grade, with scaffolding recommendations to support student comprehension. Across Grades 6-8, texts span a range of Lexile levels, including below, within, and above grade bands, as well as Non-Prose (NP) texts without Lexile measures. The majority of texts are moderately or very complex, ensuring rigorous engagement while allowing differentiation.
Accurate text complexity analysis and a rationale for educational purpose and placement in the grade level accompany core/Anchor texts and a series of texts connected to them.
The materials include text complexity guidance in the Teacher Edition for all core texts in the program. This guidance includes a quantitative analysis, a qualitative analysis, a text summary, and a rationale for educational purpose and placement. The quantitative measures include Lexile and word count. The qualitative measures include levels of meaning/purpose, text structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands. These measures are represented on a scale from slightly to exceedingly complex. Across the program, tasks are appropriate for each grade level.
According to quantitative and qualitative analysis and their relationship to the associated student task, core/anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade.
Anchor texts have the appropriate level of complexity based on their text complexity analysis and the associated reader and task. myPerspectives text complexity charts describe the unique qualitative features of each text across four categories: text structure, language features, knowledge demands, and purpose/meaning. The materials include different supports that students may need to fully comprehend different aspects of each text within these qualitative complexity measures and complete the tasks required. Across the program, tasks are appropriate for each grade level.
Grade 6
Quantitatively: Texts range from 510L- 1280L
Ten texts are below the Lexile range for the grade-band
Nine texts are in the Lexile range for the grade-band
One text is above the Lexile range for the grade-band
Ten texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Three texts are slightly complex, 15 texts are moderately complex, 12 texts are very complex, and zero texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 7
Quantitatively: Texts range from 480L- 1280L
11 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade-band
Ten texts are in the Lexile range for the grade-band
Two texts are above the Lexile range for the grade-band
16 texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Two texts are slightly complex, 19 texts are moderately complex, 18 texts are very complex, and zero texts are exceedingly complex.
Grade 8
Quantitatively: Texts range from 750L- 1200L
12 texts are below the Lexile range for the grade-band
Ten texts are in the Lexile range for the grade-band
One text is above the Lexile range for the grade-band
Eight texts are Non-Prose (NP) or do not have a Lexile, given their format
Qualitatively: Two texts are slightly complex, 21 texts are moderately complex, 8 texts are very complex, and zero texts are exceedingly complex.
Indicator 2c
Materials provide appropriate scaffolds for core/anchor texts that ensure all students can access the text and make meaning. Scaffolds align with the text’s qualitative analysis.
The scaffolding in myPerspectives materials meets expectations for indicator 2c. The curriculum provides aligned scaffolds to support students in accessing complex texts before, during, and after reading. The Teacher Edition includes “prereading differentiation” scaffolds tailored to each text’s qualitative complexity in meaning, structure, language, and knowledge demands. Before reading, students engage with historical context, concept vocabulary, and reading strategies. During reading, comprehension checks, close reading annotations, and differentiated supports help students analyze the text. After reading, assignments deepen understanding, with additional teacher guidance for differentiated instruction. The Teacher Edition offers structured support levels (substantial, moderate, light) for key reading strategies and analysis tasks, ensuring accessibility for all learners. Throughout the Teacher Edition, guidance on implementing scaffolds is sufficient.
Scaffolds align with the qualitative complexity of the program’s texts to support students in making meaning of each text.
The Teacher Edition provides potential scaffolds for each text based on their qualitative complexity across the four different measures: levels of meaning/purpose, text structure, language conventionality and clarity, and knowledge demands. The materials refer to these scaffolds as “prereading differentiation.” These scaffolds directly align with the notes regarding the text’s complexity level related to each of these domains.
In Grade 8, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read The Diary of Anne Frank, Act I by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. In the Knowledge Demands section, the Teacher Edition states that the text “requires knowledge of the Nazi occupation and the Holocaust.” Under Pre-reading guidance for Knowledge Demands, the Teacher Edition includes the following, “If students need more background information, then display a list of words and names students will need to know about the selection. For example: Nazi occupation, Holocaust, Amsterdam, Anne Frank. For each item on the list, complete the first two columns of a KWL chart with students: What I Know (K) and What I Want to Know (W). After reading the selection, return to the final column and work with students to complete What I Have Learned (L).”
Materials include scaffolds for before, during, and after engaging with a complex text.
In addition to the “prereading differentiation” scaffolds, materials include a Preparing to Read section for each text. This section includes historical perspectives (when relevant), learning about the genre, concept vocabulary, and a quick overview of the reading strategy focus. During a first read, materials provide comprehension checks, and students apply the reading strategy. During a second read, students complete close reading annotations and questions. After reading, materials provide several assignments that deepen student analysis and understanding of the text.
In Grade 7, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Don’t Just Sit There Like a Punk” by Matt de la Peña. In addition to the “prereading differentiation” scaffolds, students learn about the short story genre, explore the definition of theme, learn concept vocabulary words like paralysis, and are introduced to the reading strategy of making inferences. During the first read, students complete comprehension check questions and apply the making inferences reading strategy. The Teacher Edition includes differentiation support across varying levels of intervention (substantial and moderate) should students struggle to apply the strategy. During the second read, students annotate and answer the close reading questions. After reading, students complete various tasks to deepen their understanding and analysis. Before completing most of the after-reading tasks, a scaffold is provided for teachers to assess student readiness for the remainder of the lesson by checking student understanding of theme.
Materials include teacher guidance on how to enact each scaffold based on student needs.
The prereading differentiation guidance is separated by measures of qualitative complexity so that teachers can enact the right scaffolds based on student needs. The Teacher Edition provides notes for teachers on reinforcing the reading strategy during the first read of each text. The notes include differentiation for students who need substantial, moderate, and light support. The Teacher Edition also provides additional notes to support students with close reading annotations and questions during the second reading of each text. Lastly, the Teacher Edition provides additional notes on how to differentiate further some of the activities that students complete after reading, including checking for student readiness for the assignments and different supports for students who need substantial or moderate support.
In Grade 6, Unit 5, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Eyes Looking to the Sky” by Christopher Hallman. The Teacher Edition includes notes on reinforcing the reading strategy of “Ask[ing] Questions” for the first read of the text. These notes include guidance on introducing the strategy and guidance on how to have students practice it for the first time in the text. This second guidance set includes differentiation for students who need substantial, moderate, and light support. The light support notes state, “Tell students that asking questions can help them connect more deeply with the character in the story. Have students focus on asking questions about the characters’ feelings and motivations as they take this journey.” The Close-Read guidance includes notes on what to say to students during these parts of the lesson to help them complete the assignment.
Indicator 2c.MLL
The materials amplify rather than simplify texts while maintaining complexity to provide access for MLLs without watering down texts.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of amplifying rather than simplifying texts while maintaining complexity to provide access for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) without watering down the content. Adapted versions of core texts are included to provide access to content. However, they are written in a combination of original and simplified, lower-level content, depriving students of authentic language. Other scaffolds and language supports assist students in making meaning of the texts, but are applied inconsistently and rarely amplify English language structures and forms.
The materials include Bridge Texts, described as “adapted versions of the literary and informational texts in each unit and include vocabulary support and audio with word-by-word highlighting.” However, in adapting the texts, complexity is lost. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 2, the materials list the original text of “Horses as Healers Around the World” as having a Lexile level of 1070L. The materials list the Bridge Text for “Horses as Healers Around the World” as having a Lexile level of 890L. Additionally, MLLs lose exposure to the authentic texts through the adaptations. In Grade 8 Unit 3, the Bridge Text version of a core reading, “Brain and Body Benefits,” rewrites complex sentences in simpler language: the core text reads, “portrayed video game enthusiasts as socially awkward,” but in the Bridge text becomes “made fun of gamers, often showing them as strange.” In this case, using the Bridge Text might provide access to the broad strokes of the core text, but it limits MLLs’ access to authentic academic language. The Teachers Edition references the Bridge Texts in each Selection Overview, noting for teachers that “Students may benefit from: . . . Beginning with the Bridge Text version of the story and then transitioning to on-level version when ready.” However, no additional guidance is provided for teachers on when and how this transition should occur, increasing the likelihood that simplified texts may replace the authentic, grade-level materials.
The Teacher Edition provides a Selection Overview for each text, which includes a list of Prereading Differentiation scaffolds for all students tailored to each text’s qualitative complexity in meaning, structure, language, and knowledge demands (Refer to Indicator 2c in the full content report for additional details). This section includes a How Can I Support Multilingual Learners section, with Lesson Preview suggestions, Vocabulary and Language Support, and Transition into English. These supports assist MLLs in making meaning of the texts, but only sometimes guide teachers to support MLLs through multiple modalities, methods, and representations, and rarely involve amplifying English Language structures and forms.
For example, in Grade 7, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Don’t Just Sit There Like a Punk.” The How Can I Support Multilingual Learners section in the Selection Overview reads:
“Lesson Preview:
Help multilingual learners from other cultural backgrounds understand the story’s setting by playing a video of a few minutes of a basketball game. Allow time for students to share their ideas about the gameplay they have watched, and assist with vocabulary as needed.
Vocabulary and Language Support
Help students create and maintain a Word Wall of basketball jargon. Support the vocabulary with pantomime when possible.
Multilingual Learner notes in the Teacher’s Edition provide differentiated strategies for helping students read the selection and complete core tasks.
An additional Language Support lesson, which includes a suggested language target for this selection, is available on Realize.
Transition into English
Make a summary of the story available to students in their home languages.
Assign the text in the Interactive Student Edition. There, students can use the eText Translation tool and receive translation support for more than 100 languages.”
Each of these suggestions supports some MLLs in making meaning of “Don’t Just Sit There Like a Punk.” Previewing the text and providing translation options for those students who are literate in their home language are both helpful strategies, but do not amplify or enrich the text to provide greater depth, clarity, or complexity to support comprehension and language development. The Language Support Lesson, a supplementary lesson separate from core instruction and found on the Realize platform, most closely aligns with amplifying language structures and forms. In this lesson, students zoom in on five sections of the text to focus on realistic dialogue and using various strategies to comprehend the text. The strategies provided, however, rely primarily on teacher explanations of signaling dialogue and the sound of speech, rather than other means of enhancing and enriching the text.
Additional supports are available for students using the digital Realize Reader, including audio, text translation, and the Language Coach. At the beginning of each text, teachers are guided to “Encourage students to use Language Coach in the Interactive Student Edition for point-of-use support with:
word, sentence, and discourse levels of language
language comprehension development
knowledge building
These features provide some amplification of texts, but are often linguistically demanding themselves. For example, in Grade 8, Unit 1, students read The Banana Tree. At the end of paragraph 8, the Language Coach provides the following information for students: “Throughout the story, the narrator uses standard English to describe the story’s setting and characters. The characters’ spoken words, however, are written in Jamaican dialect. You may want ot listen to the audio recording of this story if you find the reading of dialect challenging.” While the Language Coach provides valuable information distinguishing between the kinds of language the author uses for different purposes, this explanation may not be accessible to many MLLs, particularly those at lower proficiency levels, due to the linguistic complexity. Similarly, hyperlinked definitions for individual words may prove less supportive when the definitions are not student-friendly. For example, in the same text, in paragraph 27, the word “calamity” is hyperlinked to the definition “disastrous event.” Students do have the opportunity to translate these words and their definitions into fourteen different languages, providing an additional point of access for students literate in those languages. Definitions are also available in audio form in both English and Spanish. The interactive reader offers some instances of text amplification and support, but these benefits are limited to students who are able to access their linguistic complexity and have the necessary technology to use the Realize Reader instead of the student edition textbook.
While the materials provide some supports that aim to aid comprehension, they rarely enrich or amplify English language structures and forms. Bridge Texts and adapted materials often reduce text complexity significantly and limit exposure to authentic academic language. The engineering of the Bridge Texts sometimes inadvertently excludes MLLs from key instructional tasks like Close Reads. This approach reflects a missed opportunity to amplify grade-level texts through text engineering rather than simplify them. Overall, the materials provide only sporadic amplification of texts, missing opportunities to support language development through rigorous, scaffolded engagement with complex texts.
Indicator 2d
Text sets (e.g., unit, module) are organized around topic(s) or theme(s) to cohesively build student knowledge.
The text set organization in myPerspectives materials meets expectations for indicator 2d. The curriculum structures text sets around grade-appropriate themes and essential questions, ensuring a cohesive approach to knowledge building. Each unit spans multiple genres and incorporates academic vocabulary, content knowledge, and complex syntax to deepen student understanding. The curriculum follows a structured progression from Whole-Class Learning to Peer-Group Learning and Independent Learning, allowing students to engage with texts in varied contexts. Throughout myPerspectives units, students address facets of the same topic or theme through various texts across multiple genres. This design encourages critical thinking and analysis by presenting multiple perspectives on a central theme, supporting cross-disciplinary connections in social studies, science, and literature. As students progress through each unit, they develop their own perspectives on the essential question by reading various perspectives on the topic or theme. All tasks throughout the unit lead to the Performance-Based Assessment, where students have the opportunity to show the culmination of their learning and present their response to the essential question.
Text sets are organized around a grade-appropriate, tightly-connected topic or theme.
Each myPerspectives unit is organized by a grade-appropriate topic or theme. The unit’s essential question also connects text sets. Students respond to the essential questions in the Unit Performance-Based Assessment of each unit.
Grade 6:
Unit 1 Focus: Growing Up. Essential Question: What are some of the challenges and triumphs of growing up?
Unit 2 Focus: Natural Allies. Essential Question: How do animals and people interact?
Unit 3 Focus: Living with Technology. Essential Question: Is technology helpful or harmful to our lives?
Unit 4 Focus: Imagined Worlds. Essential Question: How does imagination enrich our lives?
Unit 5 Focus: Extraordinary People. Essential Question: What makes people extraordinary?
Grade 7:
Unit 1 Focus: Crossing Generations. Essential Question: What can one generation learn from another?
Unit 2 Focus: Living Among the Stars. Essential Question: Should we make a home in space?
Unit 3 Focus: Transformations. Essential Question: Can people really change?
Unit 4 Focus: Learning from Nature. Essential Question: What is the relationship between people and nature?
Unit 5 Focus: Facing Adversity. Essential Question: How do we overcome life’s challenges?
Grade 8:
Unit 1 Focus: Rites of Passage. Essential Question: What are some of the milestones on the path to growing up?
Unit 2 Focus: Resilience. Essential Question: What do stories of resilience teach us about the human spirit?
Unit 3 Focus: Taking a Stand. Essential Question: How do we decide what matters to us?
Unit 4 Focus: Human Intelligence. Essential Question: In what different ways can people be intelligent?
Unit 5 Focus: Pushing Boundaries. Essential Question: What inspires people to invent?
Text set organization provides opportunities for students to address facets of the same topic or theme over an extended period (e.g., a unit, module), enabling the development of deeper knowledge. Text sets cohesively build knowledge across various topics in social studies (including history), science, the arts, and literature, exposing students to academic vocabulary, content knowledge, and complex syntax.
myPerspectives units are structured so that students address facets of the same topic or theme through various texts. All units start with Whole-Class Learning, which is more teacher-supported. Then, units move into Peer-Group Learning, where learning is done in small groups. Lastly, units include Independent Learning, where students select text(s) they’d like to read and independently analyze to investigate the topic/theme further. In each of these unit components, students read various texts, and this structure supports students in building deep knowledge of the topics/themes of study.
myPerspectives unit text sets span varied genres throughout each unit; text sets cover topics and themes through multiple lenses across multiple genres. Through the text sets, the materials expose students to academic vocabulary, content knowledge, and complex syntax.
In Grade 7, Unit 2, students study the unit Living Among the Stars with the essential question, “Should we make a home in space?” Throughout this unit, students focus on academic vocabulary words for arguments, including justify, dissent, certainty, discredit, and assumption. As part of the Unit Introduction, they watch a short video, “6 NASA Technologies to Get Humans to Mars,” which reveals some of the scientific innovations NASA is working on. Then, they read a Mentor Text, “Humans Are Not Meant for Space,” which serves as a model of an argumentative piece. Throughout the unit, students read texts in the disciplines of science, literature, and the arts. In the Whole-Class Learning portion of the unit, students read two texts, “Space Settlement Art,” which displays artists’ renderings of what it might look like to live in other parts of the solar system in the future so that students can begin to envision the possibility of space settlements, and the short story “Dark They Were, and Golden Eyed,” which presents Ray Bradbury’s science fiction vision of a family living on Mars, which makes a case for the human ability to adapt to new environments. This text is written in language that is not contemporary, with many short, simple sentences and “some more complex sentences with descriptive or figurative phrases.” In the Peer-Group Learning portion of the unit, students read three texts, “Japan to Start Research on the Moon and Mars for Humans” by Tomoyuki Suzuki, which presents Japan’s plan for creating living facilities on the Moon and Mars, “Why We Should Continue to Explore Space” by Sheri Buckner, an argumentative piece which presents a perspective on the reasons humans could continue to explore space, and “Why We Should Save Earth Before Colonizing Mars” by Bruce Dorminey, which presents a counterargument to the former piece. In the Independent Learning portion of the unit, students have a choice of reading four texts: two on the experiences of astronauts and downsides involved in long-term space exploration, a set of comic strips that are meant to provide students with additional perspectives on whether space exploration is necessary, and a short story “Time Capsule Found on the Dead Planet” by Margaret Atwood, which presents a suggestion that with climate change, living on Earth may no longer be possible in the future. Throughout this text set, students have the opportunity to repeatedly consider the essential question and develop their own perspectives on space exploration and the possibility of space settlements. At the end of the unit, students complete their Performance-Based Assessment, an argumentative piece on the essential question.
Indicator 2e
Materials include a range of texts and provide teacher support in helping students learn about people who are similar to and different from them.
Criterion 2.2: Knowledge Building Through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension
Information on Multilingual Learner (MLL) Supports in This Criterion
For some indicators in this criterion, we also display evidence and scores for pair MLL indicators.
While MLL indicators are scored, these scores are reported separately from core content scores. MLL scores do not currently impact core content scores at any level—whether indicator, criterion, gateway, or series.
To view all MLL evidence and scores for this grade band or grade level, select the "Multilingual Learner Supports" view from the left navigation panel.
Materials include questions, tasks, and assignments that are meaningful, evidence-based, and support students in making meaning and building knowledge as they progress toward grade-level mastery of literacy skills.
Materials include clear, explicit instruction guidance for teachers across all literacy skills.
The myPerspectives materials partially meet expectations for Criterion 2.2: Knowledge-Building through Reading, Writing, and Language Comprehension. The instructional design is grounded in research-based practices and includes a consistent structure that integrates reading, writing, speaking, and listening. Although daily lessons are well-structured, the overall volume of instructional material exceeds the time available in a typical school year, and the materials do not include guidance on how teachers should adapt the amount of instructional material to fit their local needs. Materials offer a variety of text-based questions and assignments that promote deep analysis, including close reading and writing tasks that require textual evidence. Students regularly engage in collaborative and evidence-based conversations, although lesson-specific teacher guidance for discussions is absent. Vocabulary instruction is explicit and well-supported, with consistent opportunities for students to practice newly introduced words and apply independent word-learning strategies. Grammar and sentence composition instruction is embedded throughout units, with activities tied to texts and writing tasks. Students are given frequent opportunities to write both on-demand and through extended process writing, with clear connections to unit themes and genres. Instruction in writing processes partially meets expectations, with strong support for essay-level writing but limited emphasis on paragraph-level instruction and teacher use of rubrics. Students use graphic organizers, checklists, and digital tools to engage in structured writing processes, including planning, drafting, revising, and publishing. Frequent evidence-based writing tasks support students in developing claims and arguments grounded in texts. Research opportunities are consistently provided and connected to unit content, but explicit instruction in research skills is limited. Formative and summative assessments are well-integrated, with tools for tracking progress, though teacher guidance on using rubrics and evaluating projects is not always detailed.
Indicator 2f
Materials include a clear, research-based core instructional pathway with reasonable pacing throughout the year, which allows students to work towards grade-level proficiency.
The instructional pathway outlined in myPerspectives materials partially meets expectations for indicator 2f. The program is grounded in accepted research-based practices and features an integrated instructional design that builds literacy skills through a consistent structure across all units. Each unit follows a predictable sequence—including Whole-Class Learning, Peer-Group Learning, Independent Learning, and Performance-Based Assessments—supporting skill development across reading, writing, speaking, and listening. The Teacher Edition provides detailed planning tools such as Unit at a Glance documents and lesson-specific pacing guides with standards, objectives, activities, and resource keys. The program also includes customization tools with targeted guidance and supplemental materials to support all learners. These resources help teachers adapt instruction based on student needs. While some guidance for supplemental materials is provided, additional supplemental materials do not include guidance, leaving their use up to the teacher's discretion. Although daily lessons are well-structured, the overall volume of instructional material exceeds the time available in a typical school year, depending on the school’s literacy block length. Additionally, the materials do not guide how teachers should adapt the amount of instructional material to fit their local needs.
Materials clearly outline the essential elements for the core instructional pathway. Materials clearly explain how to use and implement the core instructional pathway, which does not deviate from currently accepted research.
The front matter of the Teacher Edition details the program's core components. Each unit follows the same structure: Unit Introduction, Whole-Class Learning (culminating in the Writing Performance Task), Peer-Group Learning (culminating in the Speaking and Listening Performance Task), Independent Learning, Reflection and Response (where students complete the Unit Project and reflect), and Performance-Based Assessment.
The Teacher Edition includes a Unit at a Glance Document for each unit, which consists of a table that outlines the unit’s pacing, the genre and Lexile of each selection, the text elements the unit focuses on, the reading strategy for each selection, the vocabulary/word study focus for each selection, the author’s craft/conventions focus for each selection, and the writing/research/speaking & listening task for each selection, when applicable. Teachers should use the Unit at a Glance to “easily map the standards and skills in myPerspectives to [their] own curriculum.”
Each lesson overview page includes the “objectives, standards, pacing, and resources for instruction and assessment.” This document contains a Pacing at a Glance table, which lists the major components of each lesson and splits the lesson pacing into the number of 40-50-minute class periods needed to complete each component. Following the Pacing at a Glance table, the document lists all the activities (separated by program component) that students will complete within the lesson, in order (including any optional resources). An Additional Resources table is provided, which lists additional resources for teacher and student use. Lastly, the document includes a Resources Key so that teachers can easily identify each component in a lesson. The key is separated into eight components: activities, books/readers, practice, video/audio, assessment, teacher support, presentations, and program resources.
Overall, most of the myPerspectives program's components align with current research, and the program follows an integrated instructional approach across all literacy components. Expert Perspectives notes throughout the Teacher Edition connect research/best practices from educational experts to the materials.
When present, some supplemental materials are designed to work coherently with the core instructional pathway. Materials provide some detailed explanations of when and how to use supplemental materials so that all students can access grade-level materials.
The Teacher Edition includes a Digital Resources to Customize document at the start of each unit. This document lists optional resources teachers can use to “activate learning, engage students, and customize lessons.” The document includes rhetorical guiding questions for teachers and supplemental materials in response to these questions.
“‘What if my students struggle with the on-level text? Bridge texts enable students to ramp up to on-level texts. The materials then list some of the bridge texts for the unit.
What if I want to use podcasts to provide background? Students can learn about what’s going on in the world while they develop listening comprehension skills. Listenwise unit-aligned podcasts [include]. The materials then list the podcasts available for the unit.
What if I want to use media to activate student interest in texts? The materials provide Hook & Inspire texts.
What if my students need background or independent reading opportunities? The materials list different strategies and resources available for the unit.
What if my students need more writing practice? The materials list the digital writing lessons that would be useful for students for the unit.
What if my students need more grammar practice? The materials list interactive grammar mini-lessons that would be useful for students for the unit.
What if I want to teach a different standard? The materials suggest teachers “use Standards Practice pages to reinforce a concept or teach a standard of [their] own choosing.”
What if I want to incorporate novels? The materials list optional novels (with their corresponding Book Club Guides) that are aligned to the unit.’”
While the materials include the above guidance for some of the supplemental materials for each unit, there are additional supplemental materials in the Skills Center that the Teacher Edition does not include guidance on when to use. Therefore, it is up to teachers to decide if and when to use those supplemental materials.
Materials provide implementation schedules, including lesson-specific guidance, that are well-paced, allowing students to dive deeply into content. However, the implementation schedule may not be reasonably be completed in the school year.
Each Unit Overview includes an overall Pacing Plan for the Unit, and each Lesson Overview includes a Pacing Plan for the lesson. Each day of instruction is considered to be one 40-50 minute instructional block. If each 40-50 minute block is a day of instruction:
Grade 6 materials include instruction for 180-190 instructional days
Grade 7 materials include instruction for 205-215 instructional days
Grade 8 materials include instruction for 200-210 instructional days
While individual lessons appear well paced, given the amount of instructional material in the program, whether or not each grade level’s materials can be completed in one school year would depend on the school schedule, including more than 40-50 minutes of literacy instructional time per day, especially in grades 7 and 8.
The materials do not include guidance on how teachers should adapt the amount of instructional material to fit their local needs and number of instructional days. Given the amount of material in the program, teachers would have to decide what to cut from the program, which may change the instructional pathway.
Indicator 2g
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-based, allowing students to demonstrate their thinking in various formats.
The questions, tasks, and assignments in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2g. The materials provide opportunities for students to engage deeply with texts through text-based questions. Each reading lesson includes Reading Strategy Questions, Comprehension Questions, and First Thoughts Questions that support students in making meaning of the text during their first read, as well as Close Read questions that support students in deepening their understanding of the text during and after their targeted second read. After reading, students complete various questions, tasks, and assignments that require them to answer in different formats, including speaking and listening activities, answering multiple-choice questions, and writing short and long-form responses.
Materials provide opportunities to support students in making meaning of the texts being studied through text-based questions and tasks that require students to answer in varying formats (e.g., speaking, writing, etc.).
myPerspectives materials include text-specific and text-dependent questions for students to complete during reading. During a first read, students read for enjoyment and general comprehension. Comprehension question types include Reading Strategy Questions and Comprehension Check Questions. After this first read, students complete a First Thoughts assignment where they answer one to two questions on the text in writing and then discuss it in small groups.
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “My Achilles’ Meal” by Firoozeh Dumas. First, students read the text for comprehension and enjoyment. During this read, students answer Comprehension Check and Make Inferences questions, which is the reading strategy for this text. Some of these questions are:
“Make Inferences: Review Paragraphs 8 and 9. Why might Farah have taken Firoozeh to a toy store and allowed her to pick out any toy she wanted?
Comprehension Check: What does Firoozeh plan to tell her parents about the two new toys she has received? What prior experience inspires this plan?
Comprehension Check: Why is Firoozeh no longer interested in her stroller and doll?”
After this first read, students answer one of the First Thoughts questions below and discuss them in small groups.
“Firoozeh says that ‘kids pick up anything parents try to hide.’ Do you think this is true? Explain your ideas.
Have you been in a situation like Firoozeh’s where a family member or friend wanted to spoil you? How did you behave?”
Throughout the program, students complete many tasks and assignments that require them to answer in various formats after completing their reading for the lesson and/or unit. These tasks focus on various parts of literacy components such as Vocabulary, Reading Analysis, Evidence Logs, Writing, Speaking & Listening, Inquiry and Research, and Language. Students answer in short or long-form writing, through various types of academic discussions, and by selecting multiple-choice answers.
Materials include text-based questions and tasks that require students to closely read and/or re-read complex parts of texts to deepen their analysis and understanding.
myPerspectives materials include Close-Read questions and tasks during and after reading. These questions help students deepen their analysis of the text under study. Students complete Close-Reading questions during and after their targeted second read of the text. The program also includes general Nonfiction and Fiction Close-Read Guides, which are graphic organizers that students can use to close-read texts depending on their genre.
In Grade 7, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Dark They Were, and Starry Eyed” by Ray Bradbury. During their second read, students complete the following close reading questions:
“Close Read: Annotate: Mark details in the beginning of paragraph 34 that describe Bittering’s inner thoughts. Question: Why are these thoughts expressed in incomplete sentences with a lot of repetition, and what does this reveal about Bittering’s emotional state?
Close Read: Annotate: Mark examples of descriptive language in paragraph 41. Question: How does this use of language build suspense?
Close Read: Annotate: Mark details in paragraphs 83-95 that indicate disagreement between Bittering and the other men. Question: Why might Bradbury have chosen to build conflict through the use of dialogue?
Close Read: Annotate: Mark the Martian word Mr. Bittering says in paragraph 135. Question: Why does the author have Bittering speak Martian at this point in the story, and why is this event significant?
Close Read: Annotate: Mark the words and ideas that are repeated in paragraphs 212-222. Question: What important change in Bittering does the repetition suggest?
Close Read: Annotate: Mark details in paragraphs 269-278 that reveal the findings of the rescue mission from Earth. Question: Why has Bradbury chosen to include this scene?”
After reading, students complete the following close reading questions:
Close Read:
“The model passage and annotation show how one reader analyzed paragraph 251. Find another detail in the passage to annotate. Then, write your own question and conclusion.
Choose a section of the story that you found especially meaningful. Mark important details. Then, jot down questions and write your own conclusions in the open space next to the text.”
Indicator 2g.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in text-based questions, tasks, and assignments, as well as the demonstration of their thinking in various formats.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6-8 of myPerspectives partially meet expectations for providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in text-based questions, tasks, and assignments, as well as the demonstration of their thinking in various formats. While the materials offer some opportunities for MLLs to engage in text-based questions, tasks, and assignments, such as targeted supports for students at light, moderate, or high levels of English proficiency, these supports are often disconnected from whole-class instruction and do not consistently align with the academic tasks assigned to the broader student group.
In many cases, MLL-specific activities differ from what the rest of the class is doing, limiting opportunities for meaningful interaction with peers and full participation in shared academic discourse. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read “from My Life with the Chimpanzees.” For the first read, students read the text for basic comprehension and enjoyment, answering Comprehension Check and Reading Strategy questions. The materials do not provide any supports for MLLs to answer either of these kinds of questions. During the second read, students respond to the Close Read notes. The first Close Read note states to guide students to mark the repetition words that show in paragraph 8, and asking the question, “How does the repetition help communicate Goodall’s experience to the reader?” The accompanying Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Facing Notes guides teachers to support students with “listening logs” focused on paragraph 5. The guidance states, “Tell students they can ask questions to be sure they understand when they are listening. Display these questions: Who or what is being described? What is happening? What can I infer about the person who is telling this story? Supports are differentiated by level:
Substantial: Read or play the audio of paragraph 5. Stop every few sentences to ask the listening-log questions. Record and display students’ responses.
Moderate: Ask small groups to copy the questions, leaving space for responses. Read or play the audio of paragraph 5 in two parts. Have groups ask and respond to the questions in their listening logs. Replay the paragraph as needed.
Light: Ask students to copy the questions, leaving space for responses. Read or play the audio of paragraph 5. Have students fill out their listening logs and then compare with others.”
These suggestions support general comprehension, but do not address the Close Read Note tasks posed to all students to provoke deeper analysis of the text. The materials include two more Close Read Notes for this selection, neither of which provides MLL-specific supports.
Some Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes do support MLLs in answering questions about the text. Frequently, these supports are in addition to the core tasks intended for all students and are not integrated into the core instruction. As a result, teachers must determine how and when to implement these supports during instruction, as the materials do not offer guidance on embedding them into the core instructional flow. For example, in Grade 8, Unit 3, in the text Brain and Body Benefits: The Case for Playing Video Games, the Comprehension Check question is, “According to the author, what is one claim made by video game opponents?” The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box at the bottom of the page advises teachers to “have students ask and respond to questions about the text to clarify meaning.” Each of the three levels of support, listed below, facilitates answering the Comprehension Check question, but each requires separate facilitation, and no guidance is provided on how to incorporate them into the whole-class lesson.
Substantial: Read aloud paragraph 6, using pacing gestures and expression to emphasize meaning. Ask, What do anti-gamers claim? Anti-gamers claim _____. What do studies show? However, studies show _____.
Moderate: Have pairs read paragraph 6. Then, have one student ask a question while their partner answers. They should alternate roles. Provide students with a bank of question-and-answer words and constructions.
Light: Have students read paragraph 6 independently. Then, have students work in pairs to break down the argument. Claim: Video gaming is not harmful to mental health; Reasoning: cause and effect, evidence: statistics.
For the second read of this text, there is a Close Read note for the class on the same page that asks students to annotate by marking examples of the author’s use of data in paragraph 6 and asks the question, “How does the author use the data to support her claim?” There are no supports for MLLs for this deeper analysis question, potentially leaving MLLs who need support with only a superficial understanding of the text. This gap suggests that while materials may provide access to surface-level comprehension, they do not consistently support MLLs in participating in the higher-level thinking expected of all students. This design choice can lead to different academic outcomes for different groups of students.
Additionally, the materials provide MLL supports for comprehension, such as vocabulary glossaries or WIDA alignment references, but lack clear instructional guidance or integration into core lesson routines, including text-based questions, tasks, and assignments. Without consistent scaffolds that build toward grade-level work or help MLLs navigate and complete complex, text-dependent tasks, opportunities to demonstrate thinking across speaking, listening, reading, and writing are limited. As a result, although the materials do allow for some MLL engagement in some text-based questions and tasks, they fall short of ensuring full and complete participation alongside peers in rigorous, text-based academic work.
Indicator 2h
Materials support students in developing their ability to comprehend complex ideas within and across texts through opportunities to analyze and evaluate texts.
The analysis opportunities in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2h. The materials provide numerous opportunities for students to analyze key ideas, details, craft, and structure and the integration of knowledge and ideas within and across texts. Students engage with text-specific questions to examine texts for various layers of meaning. Lessons include tasks that require students to analyze how authors develop meaning, intentionally structure their texts, and draw connections to other media. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require students to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the Performance-Based Assessment (a written task). These tasks promote comprehension by encouraging students to deepen their analysis consistently.
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze key ideas and details (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in making meaning.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete various tasks and questions that prompt them to analyze key ideas and details to make meaning of the texts under study. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require them to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the Performance-Based Assessment.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students read “Black Cowboy, Wild Horses” by Julius Lester. After reading, they complete various questions and tasks to deepen their understanding of the story. One of these tasks requires students to analyze specific paragraphs in the text for various central ideas. The “Author’s Purpose and Central Ideas” task directions state, “Work on your own to complete the activity and answer the questions. Then, share your responses with your group.
Practice: (a) Analyze: Reread the paragraphs indicated in the chart and identify key details. (b) Interpret: Explain what central ideas about Bob Lemmons the details suggest.”
Students complete a graphic organizer where they analyze key details in paragraphs 5, 7, and 18. Then, they use this graphic organizer to further their understanding of the text through questions like “(a) In paragraph 5, what information about Bob Lemmons does the biographer explicitly state? (b) Evaluate: Why is this information important for understanding Bob Lemmons?”
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze craft and structure (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in making meaning.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete various tasks and questions that prompt them to analyze craft and structure to make meaning of the texts under study. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require them to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the Performance-Based Assessment.
In Grade 7, Unit 1, Peer-Group Learning, students read a poetry collection, including “Ode to Papi” by Guadalupe Garcia McCall, “Mother to Son” by Langston Hughes, and “To James” by Frank Horne. After reading, they complete various questions and tasks to deepen their understanding of the story. One of these tasks requires students to analyze the structure of the poems. The “Visual Elements in Poetry” task directions state, “Work on your own to complete the activity and answer the questions. Then, share your responses with your group.
Analyze: In ‘Ode to Papi,’ does the poet use conventional or unconventional punctuation? Why do you think she made that choice?
(a) Distinguish: In ‘Mother to Son,’ how does line 7 differ from other lines? (b) Interpret: What is the effect? Explain.
Analyze: In ‘Mother to Son, how does punctuation affect the way you read line 177?
(a) Interpret: In ‘To James,’ what do the ellipses suggest about the questions the speaker is asking? (b) Analyze: Why do you think the poem ends with an ellipsis? Explain.
(a) Compare and Contrast: How is the use of capitalization in the poems similar and different? (b) Interpret: What is the effect of the use of capitalization in each poem?”
Materials provide opportunities for students to analyze the integration of knowledge and ideas (according to grade-level standards) within individual texts and across multiple texts to support students in deepening their understanding on a topic.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete various tasks and questions that prompt them to analyze the integration of knowledge and to make meaning of the texts under study. In addition to analyzing each text individually, each unit includes paired text selections and assignments that require them to draw connections across texts. At the end of each unit, students use the information from all the unit’s texts to complete the Performance-Based Assessment.
In Grade 8, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read the short story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. After reading, they complete various questions and tasks to deepen their understanding of the story. One of these tasks requires students to analyze the text further. In the “Analysis” task, the following question asks students to draw connections between the story and another text. The prompt states,
“An allusion is an unexplained reference to something writers expect their readers to recognize. Writers often make allusions to the Bible, mythology, historical events, and popular culture. In paragraph 126, Fanny makes an allusion to a biblical story. If this story is unfamiliar to you, briefly research it.
(a) Connect: How does this story relate to Charlie’s experience?
(b)Analyze: What theme does the allusion help the author develop?
(c) Compare and Contrast: In what ways is Charlie’s experience different—a new take on the biblical story?”
Indicator 2h.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in developing their ability to comprehend complex ideas within and across texts through their full and complete participation in opportunities to analyze and evaluate texts.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of myPerspectives partially meet expectations for providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in developing their ability to comprehend complex ideas within and across texts through their full and complete participation in opportunities to analyze and evaluate text. The materials provide some strategies and support for MLLs to participate in such development, but these supports are not employed consistently throughout the program, and they do not always ensure full and complete participation in rigorous text-based tasks.
At the beginning of each unit, in the Unit Introduction, the materials provide teachers with a Language Checkpoint - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition. These Language Checkpoint call-out boxes provide options for matching MLLs to supports for each language domain (reading, listening, writing, and speaking) throughout the unit. Based on their performance on the QuickWrites and Icebreakers in the Unit Introduction, teachers are guided to match students with Substantial, Moderate, or Light supports found in the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes in the Teacher Facing Note. The guidance for teachers provided often helps MLL students access key vocabulary and meaning, and sometimes supports their analysis of the text. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, A Wrinkle in Time Part 1, students complete their first read of the text, “for basic comprehension and enjoyment,” and do a close read for the second read and respond to the Close Read notes. The first Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to, “Help students who are learning English to understand what is happening in this scene and the Close Read note.” The differentiated supports for all levels focus on understanding how Meg feels, so students can answer the Close Read Question: “What do these details reveal about Meg’s personality and character traits?”
The Bridge Texts provide simplified and shortened versions of the core texts with vocabulary and audio support to help MLLs better understand the material. They serve as a helpful tool for accessibility, especially for Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education (SLIFE) or MLLs at lower proficiency levels. However, these texts are largely summarized, limiting MLL students’ exposure to rich academic language structures and nuanced ideas present in the original texts. The abridged nature and limited rigor of the Bridge Texts may compromise opportunities for deeper analysis of original texts.
This evidence demonstrates that the materials partially provide strategies for MLLs to engage in comprehension of complex ideas through analysis and evaluation of texts. However, there are inconsistencies in how these supports are applied. While some units include differentiated supports that scaffold student understanding toward grade-level expectations (e.g., sentence frames, partner discussions, word walls), these strategies are not always embedded within the core academic tasks. Instead, they may redirect MLLs into alternate activities or simplified content, which can hinder their full and complete participation.
Additionally, while some supports address the four language domains, structured opportunities for academic discourse are inconsistently provided. In several lessons, such as Grade 7 Unit 3, at the end of “A Christmas Carol, Act I,” the absence of specific scaffolds for MLLs during whole-group discussions or peer interactions results in missed opportunities to develop language through academic conversations.
Although the materials do not consistently provide strategies and supports, they offer some opportunities and guidance for MLLs to develop their ability to comprehend complex ideas and analyze texts. Support is differentiated through a three-tiered structure (substantial, moderate, light) based on language proficiency. Vocabulary instruction incorporates varied approaches, including home language connections, visual support, and context-based analysis. MLLs regularly engage in reading, writing, and discussion, especially in reflection and narrative tasks. While MLL support is not fully integrated into every lesson, the materials include thoughtful scaffolds that promote content access. These reflect a growing awareness of MLL needs but would benefit from greater consistency and stronger alignment with rigorous tasks. Additionally, the simplified format of the Bridge Texts limits opportunities for MLLs to engage in deeper analysis of complex texts.
Indicator 2i
Materials include structured protocols and teacher guidance that frequently allow students to engage in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The discussion protocols and teacher guidance in myPerspectives materials partially meet expectations for indicator 2i. The program includes various discussion types, allowing students to use background knowledge, textual evidence, and ideas to deepen their thinking. While text-based discussions are present throughout the program, the program only includes a few structured repeated protocols. While the platform provides resources for Speaking and Listening activities, these resources are not consistently reinforced in the Teacher Editions and rely on teacher discretion for implementation. Although the Teacher Edition offers general guidance on setting up discussions, it lacks lesson-specific guidance for monitoring and providing feedback, which may limit teachers’ ability to facilitate and support meaningful discussions effectively.
Materials include some structured protocols that support students in participating in various types of discussions.
The myPerspectives program includes opportunities for students to engage in various types of discussions throughout the course. The discussions require students to use evidence, background knowledge, and their ideas to propel their thinking. The types of discussions included in the program are:
Partner Discussions
Group Discussions
Class Discussions
Discussion Boards
Debates
The Build Insight activities that follow reading in the program, the Teacher Edition references a Discussion Routine that includes three steps. Teachers are to encourage students to follow this routine during any discussion. The routine states, “Expand on peers’ comments, building on ideas and details. Summarize peers’ comments to clarify ideas. Ask questions to deepen the discussion.”
In all Speaking and Listening activities, materials provide instructions to students on how the activity will work and general tips for speaking effectively. In addition, the Teacher Edition includes guidance for teachers on how to set students up for each discussion.
Some examples of the type of discussion opportunities in the program are:
In Grade 7, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, students read several texts on the environmental issues on planet Earth and the potential for space settlements on other planets. After reading, they complete various tasks, including a debate. Students work in groups to develop and deliver an argument using the knowledge and vocabulary they built throughout the unit. Before the debate, teachers provide students with guidance, including “Build Arguments and Gather Evidence: Remind students that while there are many kinds of evidence, facts are still the most valuable in a debate.” Students must organize their arguments with evidence from the texts they read in the unit. Then, students debate other groups and later discuss which group’s arguments were most convincing.
In Grade 7, Unit 5, Peer-Group Learning, students read “A Work in Progress” by Aimee Mullins. After reading, they complete various tasks, including a group discussion. For this discussion, students must analyze one of two quotations from the text. Before the discussion, teachers provide students with guidance, including the characteristics of a well-organized discussion, such as “Asking and answering questions” and “Giving everyone a chance to contribute.” During the discussion, they take notes on their ideas and their peers’ ideas, and the materials directly prompt students to draw on evidence from the text. They practice listening actively by referencing sentence stems like “I wasn’t sure what you meant when you said _____. Could you provide an example?” and “I thought your idea about ____ was interesting. Could you elaborate on it?”
In the Peer-Group Learning component for each unit, materials include Accountable Talk suggestions that students should use while working with their peers. These suggestions are:
“Remember to… Ask clarifying questions. Which sounds like…
Can you please repeat what you said?
Would you give me an example?
I think you said ____. Did I understand you correctly?
Remember to… Explain your thinking. Which sounds like…
I believe ______ is true because _______.
I feel _______ because _______.
Remember to…Build on the ideas of others. Which sounds like…
When _______ said _______, it made me think of ________.”
On the Savvas Realize platform, in the Getting Started section, materials include a training link that includes a document titled “Routines to Support Teaching and Learning.” This document includes speaking and listening routines. However, these routines are not referenced in the Teacher Edition for any specific lesson. Teachers would need to use discretion on when to implement each routine.
On the Savvas Realize platform, the Skills Centers link includes a Speaking and Listening Center. This resource provides assignable mini-lessons on various speaking and listening activities such as debates, interviews, and group discussions. In addition to the Speaking and Listening Center, there is a Collaboration Center that includes videos teachers can use to support students in working together on skills like “Build on the Ideas of Others.” While these resources are present, they are not referenced in the Teacher Edition. Therefore, teachers need to use discretion on when to implement each mini-lesson or video.
Speaking and listening instruction includes some facilitation, monitoring, and feedback guidance for teachers.
The myPerspectives materials include Class-Learning strategies for Whole-Class and Peer-Group Learning that teachers can use to support learning and discussions. For example, the strategies for Whole-Class learning for Grade 6, Unit 1 are “Listen Actively, Demonstrate Respect, Show Interest, [and] Interact and Share Ideas.” The Teacher Edition includes a table that includes actions students should take to exhibit these strategies. The Guidance also suggests that teachers lead a class discussion on these strategies and elicit input from students on other actions they can take.
The Teacher Edition includes some facilitation, monitoring, and feedback guidance throughout the program. While the steps teachers should take to set up discussions throughout the program are clear, the guidance for monitoring and feedback is not specific to each lesson’s discussion, which limits teachers’ ability to engage in robust monitoring and feedback.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read Jane Goodall’s “My Life with Chimpanzees.” After reading, they complete various tasks, including a class discussion. The following teacher guidance is provided:
“Review the characteristics of a successful class discussion, such as taking turns, listening quietly without interrupting while others are speaking, asking clarifying questions, and expressing differences of opinion respectfully. Then, share these additional suggestions.
Have a pen and a sheet of paper in front of you during the discussion. Jot down any questions or ideas that come to mind as you listen to classmates speak. When it’s your turn to speak, you can refer to your notes.
Stay on point. The focus of the discussion is comparing and contrasting chimpanzee and human behaviors.
Do not monopolize the conversation. Share one or two ideas and then pause to allow others to contribute to the discussion.
Evaluate Presentations: Remind students to contribute to the discussion but listen carefully while others do so. Afterward, have them complete the Presentation Evaluation Guide.”
The Teacher Edition includes the following guidance regarding monitoring and feedback for the discussion:
“Monitor and Adjust: If the discussion lags, then use pre-prepared questions as prompts to encourage further comparisons.”
These questions are not provided, and no other guidance on giving feedback to students or monitoring the discussion is provided.
In Grade 8, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Elie Wiesel’s “Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize.” After reading, they complete various tasks, including a group discussion. The following teacher guidance is provided:
“If students are discussing the first option, they may want to take some time to review their understanding of a group’s oppression. If they are discussing the second option, they will want to review the speech to find Wiesel’s evidence for his positions.
Prepare for the Discussion: Students may want to appoint a moderator to keep the discussion on track.
Establish Rules: Check to make sure the work is divided evenly amongst group members.
During the Discussion: Explain that when students use evidence from the text or elsewhere, they should mention the source. Point out that in the discussion, they should build support for their ideas by adding examples or evidence. Remind students not to dominate the discussion by talking the longest or by dismissing the ideas of others.”
The Teacher Edition includes the following guidance regarding monitoring and feedback for the discussion:
“Monitor and Adjust: If the groups need help planning their discussions, then work with them to write questions that apply to the topic they have chosen.”
Sample questions are not provided, and no other guidance on giving feedback to students or monitoring the discussion is provided.
Indicator 2j
Materials include opportunities that frequently allow students to engage in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The evidence-based discussion opportunities in the myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2j. The curriculum provides frequent opportunities for collaborative conversations about texts, requiring students to use, apply, and incorporate textual evidence. Students engage in discussions after first and second reads, participate in Peer-Group Learning, and complete speaking and listening tasks. While most discussions are informal, structured discussions such as group discussions and partner debates encourage students to analyze texts deeply. The curriculum also includes prompts for students to consider different perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse, though formal guidance for structured discussions is less frequent. These collaborative activities help students develop critical thinking and textual analysis skills while refining their ability to articulate and support their interpretations.
Materials provide opportunities for students to engage in collaborative conversations about the text being read, which require them to utilize, apply, and incorporate evidence from texts and/or sources.
Throughout the myPerspectives units, students have many opportunities to engage in collaborative conversations about the texts being read. After completing each first read of the texts, students complete the First Thoughts Activity and then discuss their answers in groups. After completing a second read of each text, students complete several tasks to deepen their understanding and analysis. Some texts provide optional Sharing Perspectives tasks, where teachers can facilitate additional short discussion prompts. Many of the tasks in the materials require students to engage in collaborative conversations in pairs, groups, or as a whole class. While these tasks are present, most of these conversations are informal.
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “My Achilles’ Meal” by Firoozeh Dumas. After reading, students participate in a partner discussion on the questions “How is the title a humorous take on the phrase ‘Achilles’ heel?’ What is the narrator’s Achilles’ heel? How does the use of humor affect the reader’s feelings about the author and the incident she describes? Would this text have the same effect on readers if it were told without humor? Explain.” Before discussing, students are allotted time to prepare to review the text and answer independently. Students must use textual evidence in their responses. After discussing with partners, students present the highlights of their discussions to the whole class.
During the Peer-Group Learning parts of each unit, students work with their groups almost the entire time. This peer group structure requires students to engage in collaborative discussions frequently throughout each unit. Before beginning the peer group component of each unit, students go over peer-group learning strategies, such as “support others” and “clarify.” As students dive into the unit, they complete many text-specific tasks that require them to utilize, apply, and incorporate text evidence. These tasks include summaries, short responses to text-based questions, speaking and listening activities, and writing activities.
Materials provide opportunities for students to consider others’ perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse about texts and topics they are reading.
myPerspectives materials provide opportunities for students to consider others’ perspectives and engage in intellectual discourse about the texts and topics of study. While students engage in many discussions as they work through tasks throughout the program, formal discussions with more intentional guidance that ensures students consider others’ perspectives are less frequent.
In Grade 7, Unit 5, Peer-Group Learning, students read Aimee Mullins’s “A Work in Progress.” After reading, they engage in a group discussion in which they analyze two quotations from the text. One of the foci of this discussion is to listen actively. Students receive sentence stems that they can use to practice this skill as their teammates are speaking. These sentence stems prompt students to clarify their peers’ ideas and ask their peers to elaborate as they find their peers’ ideas interesting.
In Grade 8, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Elie Wiesel’s “Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize.” After reading, they discuss two text quotations in a group discussion. As they discuss, students are responsible for making sure their discussions are fruitful and engaging. They receive tips in their materials on how to do this, including acknowledging how the new information from their peers relates to their own ideas, rethinking their initial views based on others’ ideas, and posing questions both to connect others’ ideas or clarify ideas they don’t understand.
Indicator 2j.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of myView partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in evidence-based discussions about the texts they are reading. The materials directly support MLLs in some text-based discussions, but not others.
In some instances, evidence-based discussions allow MLLs to engage in structured academic discourse while building conceptual understandings and disciplinary language use. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “My Achilles’ Meal.” After reading, students participate in a partner discussion about the text. All students are allotted time to prepare to review the text and answer independently before the discussion. A Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box accompanies this activity, directing teachers to “Work with students to build language skills for partner discussions.” The leveled supports directly guide MLLs’ full participation in the evidence-based discussion:
“Substantial: Work with students to write their responses to the three bulleted questions, offering sentence frames as needed: I think the author’s Achilles’ heel is... because... In my opinion, the author’s use of humor makes the reader feel... about... I think that if the author had not used humor,... As students share their opinions and reasons, guide them to agree and disagree with their partner: I agree that... I disagree that... because ...
Moderate: Remind students that they should state their idea or opinion, and then give a reason that supports their idea or opinion. Remind them that opinion statements can be simple statements or can begin with I think... In my opinion... Reasons can be introduced with words and phrases such as... because... or One reason is...
Light: As students discuss, circulate and make sure they are staying on topic and using respectful language to share their opinions and agree or disagree with their partner.”
This scaffolded approach helps ensure MLLs can meaningfully contribute to academic conversations while developing both content knowledge and language proficiency.
In other cases, the materials do not directly support MLLs in text-based discussions. In Grade 7, Unit 5, Peer-Group Learning, students read “A Work in Progress.” After reading, they engage in a group discussion analyzing two quotations from the text. The accompanying Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box supports students in active listening, but not the linguistic demands of an evidence-based discussion. The call-out box directs teachers to “Help students prepare to seek clarification of spoken language during the group discussion. Begin by reviewing the Speaking and Listening instructions. Explain that if students don’t understand something they hear, they can ask questions, ask a speaker to repeat a statement, or ask a speaker to speak more slowly.” The leveled supports all focus on seeking clarification:
Substantial: Model seeking clarification during a group discussion. Select two students to discuss a familiar topic with you. Pause during the discussion and model asking questions, such as: Would you say that again? Display the questions and prompt students to use them during the discussion.
Moderate: As students prepare for their discussion, work with them to brainstorm and list questions they can use to seek clarification, such as: Would you say that again? Would you explain that? Have them refer to the list during the discussion.
Light: Before the discussion, have groups discuss and agree on strategies and questions they will use for seeking clarification. Then have groups practice using these strategies and questions.
While active listening is emphasized in this discussion activity, the materials do not support MLLs in engaging with the central academic task of analyzing quotations. By targeting only a limited aspect of the discussion, the supports fail to enable MLLs’ full and meaningful participation in evidence-based discourse.
The materials partially meet the criteria for supporting MLLs’ full participation in evidence-based discussions. In some lessons, MLLs receive strong, leveled scaffolds that help them build language and engage meaningfully in academic discourse. These supports include structured sentence frames and explicit guidance aligned to the discussion task. However, in other lessons, the supports focus on one small aspect of the activity without addressing the core academic task of text analysis. As a result, MLLs are not consistently equipped to fully participate in evidence-based discussions across the program.
Indicator 2k
Materials include explicit instruction on independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words to build knowledge within and across texts.
The instruction on independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words in myPerspectives materials meet expectations for indicator 2k. The curriculum provides structured, explicit vocabulary practice before, during, and after reading. Each unit begins with introducing academic vocabulary tied to the writing focus, where students predict meanings, analyze roots, and review mentor sentences. Before reading, Concept Vocabulary tasks introduce words through definitions, sentence writing, and dictionary use. Teachers may also introduce high-utility words, which vary per text. During reading, bolded words link to student-friendly definitions. After reading, students engage in Concept Vocabulary and Word Study tasks on word structure, connotations, and affixes, reinforcing vocabulary through writing and analysis. Word walls are used throughout the unit, expanding with each text. Teacher guidance includes pre-reading differentiation to support students with challenging vocabulary, guidance on facilitating the various tasks, and student sample responses to all vocabulary tasks. This consistent, structured approach ensures multiple exposures to key words across texts.
Materials include structured and explicit practices for introducing key vocabulary words and independent word-learning strategies within the context of the texts (student-friendly definitions, analyzing morphemes, etymology, word maps, and discussion of word relationships/shades of meaning, dictionary skills, context clues). Attention is paid to vocabulary essential to understanding the text and high-utility academic words. Materials provide multiple exposures to key vocabulary within (i.e., before, during, after reading) and across texts.
myPerspectives materials include an academic vocabulary component at the start of each unit. The academic vocabulary is directly related to the unit’s writing focus. Teachers introduce these words at the beginning of each unit and prompt students to review each word, predict the meaning, and list at least two related words. To support students, the roots of the words with their definitions are provided, in addition to two mentor sentences that use the word. The Teacher Edition prompts teachers to “point out that the root of each word provides a clue to its meaning” and “discuss the mentor sentences to ensure students understand the word’s usage.” This is a repetitive, structured practice in the program.
Teachers introduce the unit’s word wall at the start of the unit. Throughout a unit, students complete word walls connected to the unit’s topic or theme. They begin by completing the word wall with the Mentor Text and continue to add to it throughout the unit. This is a consistent, structured practice in the program. The Teacher Edition prompts teachers to “Tell students that they can fill in the Word Wall as they read the texts in the unit, or they can record the words elsewhere and add them later. Point out that there will be no right or wrong choice of words for their Word Walls. Each student’s will be unique.” Additional Guidance prompts that teachers should “Consider creating a classroom Word Wall and invite students to contribute to it as they finish their readings.” The Expert’s Perspective note on Word Walls in the Teacher Editions states how Word Walls support student’s vocabulary development. Some of this guidance states, “Vocabulary Word Walls enable students to learn, use, and retain a large number of useful words related to a particular concept…Using Vocabulary Word Walls also helps students choose more precise words when they write or edit. Finally, forging connections among related words, as opposed to learning words individually, allows students to approach new words with confidence and knowledge.”
myPerspectives materials include guidance and tasks that expose students to key vocabulary before, during, and after reading. These exposures are part of the program’s structured practices for introducing key vocabulary words and word-learning strategies to students.
The text complexity information in the Teacher Edition for each text provides a “pre-reading differentiation” section. For most texts, the language conventionality and clarity component provides teachers with vocabulary words they should pre-teach if students are likely to need help with the text’s vocabulary.
The Teacher Edition provides High-Utility Words for each text. The guidance includes the words, where they are referenced in the text, and how each word should be introduced to students. The strategy teachers should use to introduce high-utility words varies based on the text.
The Teacher Edition provides Content Vocabulary words for some texts. These words are genre-related. The guidance includes the words and how they should be introduced to students, including discussion questions teachers should use with students.
Before reading each text, students complete a Concept Vocabulary task. While this task varies in what it asks students to complete, it presents students with several vocabulary words from the text. Some of the tasks are using the definition to write a sample sentence, using a print dictionary to determine the meaning, pronunciation, and parts of speech, setting expectations about the text based on vocabulary words and definitions provided, writing a short story or paragraph using the vocabulary words and the definitions provided, etc. When definitions are provided in the materials, they are student-friendly. The Teacher Edition includes some guidance on facilitating this task.
In Grade 7, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, before reading “Don’t Just Sit There Like a Punk” by Matt de La Peña, students complete the Concept Vocabulary task. Teacher Guidance states, “Read the concept vocabulary words aloud and review definitions. Provide context sentences as needed to clarify word meanings. Then, call on volunteers to share their predictions about what the story might be about, based on the concept words.”
When the task requires students to infer from context as they read a text, the Teacher Edition includes additional guidance on what to do if students struggle to understand each word. This guidance often includes differentiation for students who need substantial, moderate, or light support.
As students read, myPerspectives materials bold and underline vocabulary words. Students may click the words to see their parts of speech and definitions, which are student-friendly. These words are the same as those completed in the previous Concept Vocabulary task before reading.
After reading each text, materials include a Concept Vocabulary task. The words are the same ones students saw in the Concept Vocabulary task before reading the text. These tasks include using the vocabulary words to complete a short writing task, finding more words in the text that fit similar concepts to the vocabulary words listed, answering questions about the vocabulary words, determining the connections between words, etc. The Teacher Edition provides sample student responses for these activities.
After reading each text, materials include a Word Study task. These tasks include practice with connotation and denotation, types of words (like compound words), synonyms and antonyms, prefixes and suffixes, Latin phrases, etc. The Teacher Edition provides sample student responses for these activities.
After reading each text, students return to adding to their word walls for the unit. This is a consistent, structured practice in the program.
Indicator 2k.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary words to build knowledge within and across texts.
The instructional materials reviewed for grades 6-8 of myPerspectives partially meet expectations for supporting Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary to build knowledge within and across texts. Vocabulary is routinely presented in lessons, and some supports, such as glossaries, word banks, and pronunciation guidance, are included. However, these supports are not consistently aligned with the words all students are studying, nor are they embedded in instructional routines in ways that allow MLLs to engage with peers or participate in whole-class learning.
In many instances, vocabulary instruction for MLLs appears in separate call-out boxes or teacher-facing notes, suggesting implementation alongside rather than within the core instruction. While these supports may be considered embedded based on their placement on the page, their separation from the primary student tasks can make them feel more like standalone elements, which may reduce their effectiveness in fostering authentic integration. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, after the Close Read of “Horses as Healers Around the World,” all students work on a Study Language and Craft activity as part of the materials’ structured, explicit vocabulary practice before, during, and after reading. This activity starts with Concept Vocabulary. The identified concept vocabulary words are: therapeutic, beneficial, strength, motivation, and “relate to the concepts of health and healing.” The whole class practice focuses on those four words, followed by a word study activity focused on the Latin root -bene-. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition suggests that teachers “Guide students as they acquire additional words from the selection for their Word Walls.” None of the three leveled support options directly connects to practice questions in either activity. The Substantial and Moderate supports both focus on the words relied and assist, which are sample words for inclusion on the word wall. For Light support, students are to work in pairs to add words to the word wall. While adding words to the word wall is a suggested part of this activity, the primary deliverables for students are to answer the practice questions in both the Concept Vocabulary section and the Word Study section. The materials provide no support for either, requiring teachers to scaffold this Study Language and Craft activity themselves.
In other instances, the MLL supports in the Teacher Facing Notes directly support the vocabulary learning of the whole class. For example, in Grade 8, Unit 4, the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box connected to the Study Language and Craft activity that follows the close read of “from Blue Nines and Red Words,” directly supports MLLs’ participation in the Word Study activity on the Latin suffix -ical. The materials guide teachers to “Help students employ the spelling pattern -ical accurately as they complete the Word Study activity.” MLLs are supported in their learning of the suffix -ical by practicing writing words different from those in the Word Study activity for the whole class. All students are asked to find the words alphabetical, numerical, and calendrical in the text. This differentiation activity guides the teacher to have MLL students practice with the words logical, magical, biblical, and musical. There is no guidance for teachers to directly make the connection for students between this activity and the Word Study activity that all students are completing.
In other instances, no linguistic supports are provided for MLLs. In Grade 7, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, before reading “Don’t Just Sit There Like a Punk,” students complete the Concept Vocabulary task. Teacher Guidance states, “Read the concept vocabulary words aloud and review definitions. Provide context sentences as needed to clarify word meanings. Then, call on volunteers to share their predictions about what the story might be about, based on the concept words.” There are no supports provided for MLLs for this activity.
Many selections (most of those designed for Whole Class Learning and for Peer-Group Learning, but none designed for Independent Learning) include a Language Support Lesson available on the Realize platform only. Teachers must find the reference in the “How Can I Support Multilingual Learners?” section of the Selection Overview and find the lessons associated with the selection title on the Realize Platform. The first page of each Language Support Lesson includes an overview of the MLL supports provided within the Teacher Edition, Student Edition, and digital course for the selection. The second section supports students in a Language Target focused on the text, but otherwise unrelated to what the whole class is learning. Frequently, the focus includes vocabulary, but never supports MLLs’ full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of independent word-learning strategies and key vocabulary to build knowledge within and across texts within core, grade-level instruction.
In summary, while the materials offer some tools to support vocabulary development for MLLs, these supports are often peripheral rather than fully integrated into core instruction. The separation of MLL guidance from primary lesson activities, inconsistent scaffolding, and limited alignment with whole-class tasks hinder MLLs’ full participation in vocabulary instruction. Additionally, the reliance on separate Language Support Lessons—often located on a different platform and disconnected from the main instructional flow—further fragments access. As a result, the materials fall short of providing MLLs with consistent, explicit, and integrated vocabulary instruction needed to build deep, transferable word knowledge across disciplines.
Indicator 2l
Materials include opportunities for students to practice independent word-learning strategies, as well as newly taught vocabulary words.
The opportunities for students to practice independent word-learning strategies and newly taught vocabulary words in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2l. The curriculum provides structured opportunities for students to develop independent word-learning strategies such as inferring meaning from context, morphological analysis, and etymological awareness. At the start of each unit, students engage in Academic Vocabulary tasks, where they analyze root words and examine mentor sentences. Students use these components to predict the meaning of the vocabulary words. Before and after reading, students complete Concept Vocabulary tasks, which include using context clues, dictionary skills, and writing exercises to reinforce vocabulary acquisition. Additionally, Word Study tasks provide explicit instruction on prefixes, suffixes, connotation, denotation, and word relationships. Students consistently apply newly learned vocabulary in discussions, writing assignments, and Performance Tasks, ensuring multiple exposures to key words. Word Walls further support vocabulary retention by allowing students to track and revisit important words throughout the unit, strengthening their understanding through continuous practice.
Materials include opportunities for students to use independent word-learning strategies to understand the meaning of challenging words (inferring from context, using morphological or etymological awareness).
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students complete vocabulary tasks that require them to practice using independent word-learning strategies. These strategies include inferring from context, dictionary skills, and using morphological and etymological awareness.
At the start of each unit, students complete an Academic Vocabulary task. Students are given the definitions of root words and sample sentences; using what is provided, students practice inferring the meaning of the vocabulary words.
In Grade 6, Unit 3, the academic vocabulary words are focused on arguments. The words are convince, certain, sufficient, declare, and justify. For the word justify, the Latin root, -jur-/-jus- meaning “law” and “right” is provided. Materials include the following mentor sentences: “1. I don’t think there’s anything you can say that will justify that bad behavior. 2. The student’s excellent grades justify her promotion to advanced math.” Students use the Latin root definition and sample sentences to infer the meaning of the word.
Before and after reading each text, students complete a Concept Vocabulary task. While these tasks vary, some of them require that students practice using a dictionary to figure out a word’s definition, pronunciation, and part of speech, and some of them require the use of context clues.
In Grade 8, Unit 2, Peer-Group Learning, before reading Andrew Lam’s “Letter to a Young Refugee,” students complete a Concept Vocabulary task. This task summarizes the strategy of using context clues. Then, it requires students to infer the meaning of three vocabulary words as they read the text using context clues: fled, dispossessed, and exiled.
After reading each text, students complete a Word Study task. These tasks help students develop word knowledge, including etymological and morphological awareness. They include practice with suffixes, prefixes, roots, types of words (like compound words), connotation, and denotation.
In Grade 7, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read A Christmas Carol: Scrooge and Marley Act I, a drama based on the novella by Charles Dickens. After reading, students complete the Word Study task. In this task, students learn about the Latin prefix mal-, which means “bad.” Then, they see the prefix used in a word from the text, malcontent. Last, they write a sentence using the word and use a dictionary to find three more words that use the same prefix and use these words in a sentence as well.
Materials include opportunities for students to use academic and content-specific vocabulary in various contexts.
During each Performance Task, students are challenged to “use one or more of the unit’s academic vocabulary.”
During many Concept Vocabulary Tasks, students practice using vocabulary words in a sentence or short written assignments, allowing students to practice newly learned vocabulary in a different context.
In Grade 8, Unit 5, Peer-Group Learning, students complete a Concept Vocabulary task after reading “Icarus and Daedalus,” retold by Josephine Preston Peabody. After determining what the words have in common with their groups, students “Use each vocabulary word in a sentence. Include context clues that hint at each word’s meaning.” They must use all three vocabulary words in the scene: imprisoned, liberty, and captive.
Practice opportunities incorporate review of previously learned words based on their connection to the topic of study.
In each unit, students complete a Word Wall related to the unit’s topic or theme. As students progress through the unit’s text set, they refer back to and add to their word walls. This practice allows students to refer back to words they learned in the unit.
In Grade 7, Unit 5, the theme is “Facing Adversity.” As they read the Mentor Text, students complete a word wall that requires them to “identify interesting words related to facing adversity…Continue to add words as you complete the unit.” Each word wall document gives students a starting point, which includes three vocabulary words from the Mentor Text. In this unit, the words are dire, humble, and competence. As students continue to read the texts in this unit, they add to their Word Walls.
The Concept Vocabulary activities students complete before and after reading each text include the same words. This practice allows students to return to words multiple times across the learning process.
At the beginning of each unit, students learn new Academic Vocabulary relevant to the unit. During this task, students must note at least two related words to each academic term.
At the beginning of each unit, students set goals. One of these goals is based on the statement “I can understand and use academic vocabulary related to” the writing focus of the unit. Students evaluate their progress during the unit and introduction and the unit reflection.
Indicator 2l.MLL
Materials provide supports for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the practice of independent word-learning strategies, as well as newly taught vocabulary words.
The instructional materials reviewed for grades 6–8 of myPerspectives partially meet the expectations of providing strategies and supports for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) to fully and completely participate in the practice of independent word-learning strategies and newly taught vocabulary words. The materials provide support for MLLs for some practice of word-learning strategies and newly taught vocabulary words. However, these supports are inconsistently employed across units and do not consistently ensure full and complete participation by MLL students in core vocabulary-related tasks.
Across all grade levels, the materials offer a variety of differentiated supports categorized by proficiency level (Substantial, Moderate, and Light). These supports often focus on vocabulary recognition and comprehension, providing tools such as sentence frames, guided word study routines, and opportunities to work with cognates, prefixes, and context clues. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 4, as part of the Unit Introduction, all students are introduced to academic vocabulary words related to fiction. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition uses a combination of definition and contextual sentence writing. At the end of Whole-Class learning, all students write a compare and contrast essay as the written Performance Task. A note for students at the end of the assignment says: “Use Academic Vocabulary: Try to use one or more of the unit’s academic vocabulary words in your essay.” There are no supports for MLLs for this independent application of learned vocabulary, although teacher guidance for writing the essay is included in the Teacher Edition. Other supports for MLLs to practice vocabulary acquisition include using illustrations and translation from their home languages. This multi-pronged approach can support students’ content vocabulary acquisition and reinforce understanding through all four domains: reading, writing, speaking, and listening.
While such strategies designed for MLLs appear in specific lessons, they are not systematically embedded throughout the curriculum. Vocabulary supports like those mentioned above usually appear in sidebars or teacher-facing note boxes, separate from the core grade-level tasks. For instance, in Grade 7, Unit 3, while all students are practicing using the Greek prefix para-, MLLs receive tiered support on the use and application of the prefix para- in a Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition. Yet, these scaffolds are not consistently integrated into the lesson flow. Many other Word Study activities include no supports for MLLs.
In addition, language supports do not consistently align with the goals for academic vocabulary use for all students. In several instances, such as in Grade 8, Unit 2, vocabulary development for MLLs is handled in a parallel track—using simpler tasks or different vocabulary lists than those used by the rest of the class. In the Concept Vocabulary activity following the Whole Class reading of “from Acceptance Speech for the Nobel Peace Prize,” all students are assigned the following six vocabulary words related to suffering: perished, mutilated, humiliation, persecuted, traumatized, and abhorrent, and then answer questions to practice using this new vocabulary. There is a note for students noting words related to resilience for the Word Wall. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition only supports the word wall portion of this activity. By not supporting the Concept Vocabulary task and separating MLLs from the core academic expectations, this structure undermines equitable access to grade-level language demands.
While the materials include some supports for MLLs to independently practice using newly taught vocabulary words and independent word-learning strategies, they are inconsistently applied, occasionally include content simplification, and lack integration into core instructional pathways, limiting their effectiveness in supporting MLLs’ full and complete participation in grade-level tasks.
Indicator 2m
Materials include explicit instruction on sentence composition appropriate to grade-level standards, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The explicit instruction for teaching sentence composition in myPerspectives meets expectations for indicator 2m. Grammar instruction is integrated into each unit, with activities that require students to analyze and revise sentences based on mentor texts, core texts, and their own writing. The Teacher Edition includes modeling, differentiation strategies, and checks for understanding before students complete grammar exercises. Throughout the writing process, students engage in drafting, revision and editing, using mentor texts as models and revision checklists to refine their work. Specific teacher guidance and Quick Conference questions support students in improving sentence clarity, structure, and flow. Additionally, grammar activities incorporate authentic text-based examples, requiring students to edit or analyze sentences from core readings. This structured approach ensures students receive explicit instruction and practice opportunities to enhance their sentence-composition skills.
Materials include explicit instruction in sentence-composition skills (use of punctuation, sentence elaboration, sentence combining using cohesive ties, sentence fluency), embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
After reading each text, students complete several activities. For many texts, this includes a grammar and usage component. For some of these activities, students write sentences. The Teacher Edition includes guidance on checking students’ level of understanding of the grammar concept before they begin the activity with an example. After this check for understanding, the Teacher Edition presents differentiation options for remediating the concept based on the level of student support, often substantial or moderate. Then, students complete the grammar activity.
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Peer-Group Learning, students read “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros. After reading, they complete a Study Language and Craft activity on pronoun-antecedent agreement. The Teacher Edition includes guidance for checking students’ understanding first. This guidance states, “Evaluate student readiness for the lesson by displaying this frame and having students fill in a pronoun and its antecedent: Although
loved music, loved sports more. Monitor student responses, and then differentiate as needed, using the support notes below.” After this check for understanding, there are two differentiation options in the Teacher Edition if students need support. The guidance for substantial support states, “Before teaching the lesson, reinforce the idea that a pronoun takes the place of a noun. Provide this example, and help students identify the pronoun and the antecedent.” The example is “Although Keiko was good at writing, she wanted to become a musician.” The guidance for moderate support states, “As you teach the lesson, provide extra examples of vague pronouns for students to correct.” The examples listed are “Eric and Brian went to his house after the game. The Raiders didn’t play two of the other teams because their bus broke down.” Last, students complete the activity, which requires them to learn about pronoun-antecedent agreement, list pronouns and their antecedents found in a short selection from the text, and rewrite or edit two sentences about the text with vague pronouns.
Students write a longer piece of work for each unit’s written Performance Task. As part of the writing process, there is time for drafting, revision, and editing. During these activities, students return to the unit’s Mentor Text and are prompted to analyze and discuss it and “Read Like a Writer.” The Teacher Edition includes notes on facilitating and Quick Conference questions that they can use to support each student.
In Grade 8, Unit 2, students write an informational essay as the unit’s written Performance Task.
After planning and prewriting, students move to drafting. First, students analyze paragraphs 1 and 2 of a model draft from the Mentor Text with specific annotations, noting any observations about how the writer engages the reader’s interest. Then, students complete a Coherence and Craft activity where they work on their introduction, topic sentences, and transitions in their sentences. Teacher guidance is focused on highlighting the essential point that “A coherent essay is one in which ideas are connected and supported to make one overarching point.” The guidance includes directions for the teachers on how to facilitate the Coherence and Craft activity, where students learn about different transition words and the logical relationships they convey between ideas. Differentiation guidance is provided for teachers to use with students who may need substantial or moderate support with this activity.
After revising, students move to editing, focusing on sentence combining. The Teacher Edition includes guidance on launching the task, including “Explain to students that editing is the process of correcting errors in grammar, usage, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.” For this part of the writing process, students practice “Reading Like a Writer” by re-examining the unit’s mentor texts with correction notes. Teacher guidance for this section states, “Walk students through the corrections the author of the Mentor Text made. Then, allow students a few minutes to complete the activity.” The activity requires students to practice combining sentences. After the activity, students apply this learning to their own essays. Teacher Guidance states, “Explain that too many short sentences will make students’ writing choppy and stilted. Suggest that students read the essay aloud to themselves to hear and identify short, choppy sentences more easily.” Teacher Guidance also includes Quick Conference questions to use with students individually. For this task, these questions are: “What kind of errors have you corrected? Try reading this sentence aloud. Does the grammar sound correct? Are you editing in an orderly way? If not, focus on one type of error at a time. Can you show me something you changed when editing?”
Materials utilize exemplar sentences from core and mentor texts that contain clear, varied, and rich examples of sentence structure.
Each unit begins with reading a Mentor Text, which allows students to learn about the genre of writing aligned to the written Performance Task. Students return to this Mentor Text while drafting, revising, and editing their written Performance Task.
The Grammar Activities throughout each unit include sentences that are either about the text or from the text.
In Grade 6, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read a drama version of “A Wrinkle in Time” by John Glore. After reading Part 1, students complete a grammar activity about sentence types and their functions. Students are to edit sentences from the text to change their type and function. The sentences in the assignment are:
“After the haunted house, you’re coming to our house for dinner.
Don’t you think you should ask your mom first?
Is that Black Thing what my father is fighting?”
In Grade 7, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Bee Highway: Making a Place in the Bee City” by Kathryn Hulick. After reading, students complete a grammar activity about diction, meaning, and tone. As part of the activity, students are to analyze passages from the text and identify words and phrases that they consider descriptive or technical. The passages from the text are:
“Bees may love tall grass, weeds, and fallen leaves or logs, but most humans don’t. Thankfully, people can create beautiful outdoor spaces that bees also love. Girl Scouts Georgia Basch and Charlotte Wilder are both fourth graders who live in the Detroit area. They made a special space for bees in Georgia’s backyard, beside a tomato and a basal plant.
Diseases and parasites have affected many bees. Pesticides and herbicides sicken bees. In addition, bee colonies get stressed when they can’t find enough food or enough variety of food or when their habitat changes. Any of those problems alone may be enough to kill an entire colony.”
Indicator 2m.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of sentence composition appropriate to grade-level standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of sentence composition appropriate to grade-level standards, embedded in what students are studying in the unit. The materials provide supports in some instruction of sentence composition, but not others.
In some sentence composition lessons, the materials provide MLL supports that directly connect to the sentence composition instruction. For example, in Grade 8, Unit 2, students write an informational essay as the unit’s written Performance Task. During drafting, students complete a Coherence and Craft activity where they work on their introduction, topic sentences, and transitions in their sentences. Teacher guidance focuses on highlighting the essential point that “A coherent essay is one in which ideas are connected and supported to make one overarching point.” The accompanying Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box directs teachers to “Help students write using a variety of grade-appropriate connecting words to combine phrases, clauses, and sentences in their informational essays. Review the Sample Transitions and add others, such as and, because, so, but, and like.” Leveled supports follow:
Substantial: Work with students to write a paragraph. Focus on capturing ideas rather than on transitions. Read the paragraph aloud. Point out sentences that lack transitions. For example, discuss related sentences, such as: Anne was hopeful about people. She believed that most people were good. Model using a transition, such as for example to show the connection. Display and have students copy revised sentences.
Moderate: Have small groups read their paragraphs aloud, work together to identify sentences that are connected, and discuss transitions that could be added to show those connections. Then, have students rewrite the sentences using the transitions.
Light: Have pairs of students take turns reading their paragraphs aloud and making suggestions about combining sentences using transitions. Suggest they refer to the Sample Transitions as needed. Encourage them to discuss how the transitions clarify the meaning of their paragraphs.
This targeted guidance helps MLLs build coherence in their writing by providing accessible, scaffolded practice aligned to the lesson’s sentence composition goals.
Other lessons, however, provide no MLL supports for sentence composition instruction. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 1, Peer-Group Learning, students read “Eleven” and then complete a Study Language and Craft activity on pronoun-antecedent agreement. The materials provide no MLL supports for this lesson. They do provide Teacher Facing Notes, prompting teachers to 1. Check for Readiness, 2. Differentiate, and 3. Monitor Progress. None of these three prompts includes guidance on supporting students with different language proficiencies. The Differentiate step suggests teachers provide additional examples for both the Substantial and Moderate support levels, which is not sufficient to ensure MLLs can fully and completely participate in this grade-level sentence composition activity.
In some lessons, materials include targeted, leveled scaffolds that align with the sentence composition instruction. However, other lessons lack MLL-specific supports altogether, and general differentiation guidance does not address varied language proficiency levels. This inconsistency limits MLLs’ access to grade-level sentence composition instruction across the program.
Indicator 2n
Materials include evidence-based opportunities for students to practice sentence composition and editing of their own writing, appropriate for their grade level.
The sentence composition opportunities in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2n. The curriculum provides opportunities for students to write sentences about texts while practicing sentence composition skills. After reading, students complete grammar and language activities that require them to write sentences using specific structures related to the text. During written Performance Tasks, students revise and edit their writing with a focus on sentence clarity, structure, and style, using mentor texts as models. The curriculum also guides students to adapt their language based on audience and purpose, reinforcing precise word choice, sentence complexity, and formal writing conventions. These structured activities ensure students apply and refine their sentence composition skills throughout the writing process.
Materials include opportunities for students to write sentences about the texts under study while practicing and applying sentence composition skills.
After reading each text, students complete various activities. Some of these activities require them to consider grammar, usage, and language, and some prompt students to produce sentence-level writing about the texts under study.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from “My Life with Chimpanzees” by Jane Goodall. After reading, they complete a Study Language and Craft activity on reflexive and intensive pronouns. After learning about both, students practice marking reflexive or intensive pronouns in sample sentences from the core text. Then, they write three sentences on their own to the prompt, “Write three sentences about Jane Goodall’s experiences at Stream National Park. In each sentence, use an intensive or reflexive pronoun.”
Materials include opportunities for students to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining their own writing.
During each written Performance Task, students complete editing activities as part of the writing process. These activities allow students to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining their drafts with a particular instructional focus and revising sentences to make improvements.
In Grade 8, Unit 1, students write a Personal Narrative as the unit’s written Performance Task. During the editing process, students re-analyze a section of the unit’s Mentor Text with a sentence focus on active vs. passive voice. After learning that “too many verbs in a sentence can make writing seem inactive and vague,” they practice rewriting a provided paragraph, ensuring it uses active rather than passive voice. After practicing with this provided paragraph, students examine their own narratives and edit their sentences to ensure that they are using active voice throughout their narratives.
Materials include opportunities for students to adapt their language based on the intended audience and purpose.
Some of the assignments that students complete after reading texts prompt them to adapt their language based on their intended audience.
In Grade 7, Unit 4, students read “The Bee Highway: Making a Place for Bees in the City” by Kathryn Hulick. After reading, they complete several tasks, including writing a formal letter in response to the prompt, “Imagine that your school administration is considering adding rooftop bees to your school building. Write a formal letter to your principal, expressing your opinion on the matter.” As part of the activity, students are required to use a “formal style throughout.”
During each written Performance Task, students edit and revise as part of the writing process using the unit’s Mentor Text as a guide. During revision, they consider the clarity, development, style, organization, and tone of their writing. During editing, they consider the reader of their work and make changes to their writing to strengthen it and meet its intended purpose. Teachers remind students of the importance of the editing process and remind students of the purpose of the genre of writing they are working with, and how lack of revision can hinder their writing.
In Grade 7, Unit 2, students write an Argument: Editorial as the written Performance Task. During revision, students complete a checklist; part of this checklist requires students to consider their style. The guiding questions on this part of the checklist are: “Are my word choices precise and concise? Is my style appropriately formal for an editorial? Have I used complex sentences correctly?” Before editing, teachers are to remind students that “if readers see errors in an editorial, they are less likely to take the writer’s ideas seriously.” During the editing process, they re-analyze a section of the unit’s Mentor Text with a sentence focus on complex sentences. The Mentor Text includes annotations and changes that the writer made to strengthen their writing. One of these notes states, “Fixed an error in which the writer used a comma before a dependent clause in the middle of a complex sentence.” Following this analysis, students complete a short activity, where they revise provided sentences to ensure the subordinating conjunction “shows the correct logical relationship between ideas.” Then, they rewrite or edit their own sentences in their report to fix any inaccurate complex sentences in their writing.
Indicator 2n.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in sentence composition practice and editing of their own writing, appropriate for their grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for grades 6-8 of myPerspectives partially meet expectations for supporting Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in evidence-based opportunities for sentence composition practice and editing of their own writing, appropriate for their grade level. The materials provide supports and strategies for MLLs for sentence-composition activities; however, they are not consistently integrated or clearly aligned with the core writing instruction provided to the entire class.
In some instances, such as during a whole-class review of an argumentative writing checklist, the support for MLLs is directly connected to the core task for all students. For example, in Grade 8, Unit 3, Writer’s Handbook, all students are directed to, “Use the Revision Checklist for Argument to evaluate and strengthen your editorial.” The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to “have students revise their editorial to ensure a variety of sentence lengths. Help students revise pairs of related simple sentences to form compound sentences.” Each level of support (Substantial, Moderate, and Light) focuses on supporting students in combining sentences. One of the points for evaluation in the Revision Checklist for Argument used by all students is, “Have I used a variety of sentence types and lengths?” The MLL differentiation guidance provides direct support for this. However, these moments of alignment are infrequent, and there is a general lack of clarity about how and when to implement MLL-specific strategies, particularly for teachers new to teaching MLLs.
The materials include some responsive supports designed to target student needs, which could benefit MLLs. However, these supports are not clearly designated for MLLs nor differentiated by language proficiency level. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from “My Life with Chimpanzees” by Jane Goodall. After reading, they complete a Study Language and Craft activity on reflexive and intensive pronouns. After learning about both, students practice marking reflexive or intensive pronouns in sample sentences from the core text. Then, they write three sentences on their own to the prompt, “Write three sentences about Jane Goodall’s experiences at Stream National Park. In each sentence, use an intensive or reflexive pronoun.” There is no specified MLL support in the Teacher Edition, but there are prompts to “1. Check for Student Readiness, 2. Differentiate,” the latter of which includes Substantial and Moderate supports. While some MLLs may benefit from these general supports, the lack of specific linguistic scaffolds and differentiation by language proficiency requires teachers to either omit these supports or develop them independently.
Furthermore, in many cases, the differentiation tasks designed for MLLs are separate from what their peers were doing. There is no clear explanation of when or how teachers should implement those activities within the flow of whole-class instruction. For example, in Grade 7, Unit 4, students read “The Bee Highway: Making a Place for Bees in the City” by Kathryn Hulick. After reading, they complete several tasks, including writing a formal letter in response to the prompt, “Imagine that your school administration is considering adding rooftop bees to your school building. Write a formal letter to your principal, expressing your opinion on the matter.” As part of the activity, students are required to use a “formal style throughout, providing students with an opportunity to adapt their language based on the intended audience and purpose. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition directs teachers to “Help students employ English spelling rules needed for salutations and closings.” While using appropriate titles for people in English and closely with sincerely, cordially, or respectfully contribute to a formal tone, the Teacher Edition does not include guidance on how to make this connection for students, nor are other supports for the use of formal tone provided. This lack of connection between MLL-specific supports and core academic tasks leaves MLLs without entry points to the grade-level activity.
Additionally, while there are examples encouraging students to draft or brainstorm in their home language before rewriting in English, there is no guidance provided on how to scaffold this practice, especially for students who are not literate in their home language. The materials provide no additional guidance for teachers as to how to use home language to support their completion of editing activities as part of the writing process (for more information on home language use in the materials, see Indicator 3.2.MLL-1). These activities allow students to practice and apply sentence composition skills by examining their drafts with a particular instructional focus and revising sentences to make improvements. Leveraging students’ home languages as a bridge to learning is a valuable strategy; however, its effectiveness is limited by the lack of integration throughout the writing process. Without clear teacher guidance as to how to match students appropriately with this support, this strategy is impractical and inequitable in all classrooms and for all MLL profiles, such as Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education (SLIFE) or long-term MLLs.
In conclusion, while the materials include some supports for sentence composition and editing, they fall short of ensuring MLLs can fully and completely engage in these writing activities alongside their peers. Supports are inconsistently integrated and are frequently disconnected from core instruction. Without clear guidance for implementation, teachers are left to create additional resources on their own.
Indicator 2o
Materials include a mix of both on-demand and process writing opportunities that are appropriately-aligned in purpose, genre, and/or topic to the reading of that unit.
The on-demand and process writing opportunities in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2o. The curriculum includes a mix of on-demand and process writing tasks. Each unit begins with Quick Writes and summary activities, followed by on-demand writing prompts after reading texts, which vary in length and complexity. Students also engage in process writing through Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments, which align with the unit’s Mentor Text and require them to synthesize information and ideas from their reading. This consistent connection between reading and writing fosters deeper understanding. While the program provides structured persuasive, explanatory, and narrative writing, the distribution does not fully align with standards, as narrative and explanatory writing are emphasized more than persuasive writing. Writing tasks are closely tied to the themes, topics, and genres of the readings, reinforcing students’ ability to write purposefully and analytically.
Materials include a mix of grade-appropriate on-demand and process writing.
myPerspectives materials include various on-demand and process writing tasks.
At the start of each unit, students read a Mentor Text and complete a Summary and a Quick Write response, where they draft their initial thinking on the unit’s essential question.
After reading each text, students complete various activities. Many of these activities require on-demand written responses that vary in length (from sentence to paragraph to multiple paragraphs).
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from My Life with Chimpanzees by Jane Goodall. After reading, they complete an on-demand essay task to the prompt, “In My Life with Chimpanzees, Jane Goodall describes the process she used to earn the chimpanzees’ trust. Review the text and record details that show the steps Goodall followed. Then, write a brief how-to essay that describes her process for befriending chimpanzees.”
In Grade 7, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read the play A Christmas Carol: Scrooge and Marley and an excerpt from the novella A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens. After reading, students complete an assignment that includes various short response prompts, including “(a) Compare and Contrast: Reread Act II, Scene 3, paragraph 83 of the play and paragraph 22 of the novella excerpt. How did the playwright adapt the text from the novella to suit the purposes of a play? (b) Make a Judgment: Which version do you think is more effective? Explain your choice.”
Each unit includes various performance tasks and a performance-based assessment. Most of these require students to complete a process-writing assignment.
In Grade 8, Unit 5, one of the two Performance Tasks and the Performance-Based Assessment require students to write a short story.
The Performance Task prompt states, “Write a short story that centers on this idea: an imaginary invention that has unexpected consequences. Your short story can be realistic fiction, adventure, science fiction, or another genre. Include the elements of a short story in your writing.” In order to complete this task, students engage in the complete writing process, including prewriting, planning, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing.
The Performance-Based Assessment prompt states, “In this unit, you met characters and real people who pushed the boundaries of invention. You also practiced writing short stories. Now, apply what you have learned. Write a short story about an invention that changes the way people live. Use a real or fictional invention mentioned in this unit–or come up with one of your own. Work to have your story shed light on the Essential Question.” In order to complete this assignment, students must plan, draft, review, and edit their short stories.
Materials do not reflect the distribution indicated by the standards for process writing (6-8 35/35/30 persuade/explain/convey experience). (This criterion is evidence only and not considered in scoring.)
The process writing distribution in the myPerspectives program is as follows:
Grade 6: 20/40/40 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 7: 20/40/40 persuade/explain/convey experience
Grade 8: 20/40/40 persuade/explain/convey experience
Generally, myPerspectives materials do not meet the distribution indicated by the standards across process writing opportunities throughout the program.
Writing opportunities are appropriately aligned to the purpose, genre, and/or topic of the unit’s reading.
Each written Performance Task and Performance-Based Assessment requires students to synthesize learning from the unit’s reading. The genre of each unit’s written Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments is directly aligned to each unit’s Mentor Text.
Most of the unit’s designated Writing assignments directly align with the genre of writing that students examine in the Mentor Text and target in the written Performance Task and Performance-Based Assessments.
In Grade 6, Unit 3, students complete a unit titled Living With Technology. The Mentor Text, written Performance Task, and Performance-Based assessments are argumentative essays. Other designated writing assignments and lessons include a narrative retelling, practice with references in informational writing, practice with claims and structural patterns, an argumentative essay, and an informational report. Most of these writing assignments and lessons support students in completing their Performance-Based Assessment to the prompt “Is technology helpful or harmful in our lives?” While the essay is argumentative, students are expected to use strong evidence, such as facts and statistics, to support their positions. For this reason, the previous assignments on informational writing align with this culminating prompt.
Indicator 2p
Materials include explicit instruction in varied writing processes, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The explicit instruction in varied writing processes in myPerspectives partially meets expectations for indicator 2p. The curriculum provides some explicit instruction in writing processes, particularly for multi-paragraph writing across genres, embedded within the unit structure. Writing assignments are integrated with texts students read, and Mentor Texts serve as models for genre-specific writing. Throughout the curriculum, students analyze mentor texts to understand writing structures, apply techniques to their own work, and receive teacher guidance for feedback and revision to improve coherence and clarity. Materials guide students through each stage of the writing process for each Performance Task—planning, drafting, revising, and editing—with support through checklists, guiding questions, and Quick Conferences. While instruction on essay structure and development is strong, there is limited focus on paragraph-level writing, outside of multi-paragraph assignments. Teachers are supported with rubrics, sample responses, differentiation support, and Quick Conference questions, though guidance for using rubrics and encouraging student reflection is minimal. Overall, writing tasks are aligned to unit themes and help students apply reading knowledge to their own compositions.
Materials include some explicit instruction in writing processes (multi-paragraph construction for varying purposes), embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit. While materials include some instruction in multi-paragraph construction, there is limited instruction on paragraph-level writing, outside of multi-paragraph assignments.
Throughout the myPerspectives curriculum, students have opportunities to practice writing for different purposes. Writing assignments are directly integrated with the reading students complete throughout each unit. Teacher Guidance for these assignments is provided in the Teacher Edition at the point of use.
After students read texts throughout the units, some of the tasks that follow are writing tasks. These tasks include clear instructions with checklists and tips. The Teacher Edition provides general guidance on how to support students with completing these tasks.
In Grade 8, Unit 5, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All Time” by Vicky Baez. After reading, they complete various activities, including a Writing task. The Writing task requires students to write “a memorial that captures Nikola Tesla’s life and shares his accomplishments.” The assignment includes guidelines for students as they draft and edit, such as “Maintain a respectful tone appropriate for a serious occasion” and “Describe Tesla using precise words and phrases, and include relevant descriptive details about his major life events.” The Teacher Editions include general facilitation guidance, such as “Remind students to use a variety of transition words to convey sequence, show shifts in time or setting, and indicate relationships among events.”
In each unit, students complete a written Performance Task. Across the curriculum, these tasks vary in their genre and purpose. The Teacher Edition includes guidance for facilitating each part of the writing process. While there is no direct instruction, the Mentor Text serves as a model writing assignment for students, and the materials include guiding questions and annotations that support students in learning about and implementing writing strategies and processes.
While the materials include various opportunities for students to receive guidance on multi-paragraph writing, they provide limited instruction on paragraph-level writing. While students have opportunities to write paragraphs during the activities they complete after reading, there is no specific writing instruction for these written assignments.
Materials provide teachers with mentor texts and/or student exemplars to support students in examining how the genre works.
Each unit begins with a Mentor Text, which aligns with the unit’s theme/topic and genre of writing students complete in the written Performance Task and the Performance-Based Assessment. Students read and summarize each Mentor Text during their first encounter with it. Teacher notes include guidance they should provide students during this first read, such as noting the text’s structure. During each written Performance Task, the materials prompt students to return to the Mentor Text several times as a sample of writing for the genre. For various parts of the writing process, students analyze parts of the Mentor Text to learn more about the genre of writing.
In Grade 6, Unit 3, the Mentor Text is titled “That’s Not Progress!” and serves as an exemplar of argumentative writing. Teacher Guidance as students first read this text includes “Have students note the structure of the text. Point out that the author introduces the topic and takes a position on it in the first and second paragraphs.” Students revisit this Mentor Text during their written Performance Task argumentative essays later in the unit. First, they refer listed elements of an argumentative essay and apply them to the Mentor Text. Teacher guidance states, “Direct students to find and mark each of the Elements of an Argumentative Essay within the Mentor Text. If students are unable to find an element, have them take note of that. Then, lead a brief class discussion about argumentative essays and what makes them effectively persuasive.” Students refer back to the Mentor Text again during the drafting, revision, and editing parts of the writing process, where they practice “Read[ing] Like a Writer” by analyzing various parts of the Mentor Text with guiding annotations and questions. Teacher guidance supports teachers in facilitating these parts of the learning.
Materials provide some guidance and instruction to teachers on how to provide timely and constructive feedback on student writing.
The Teacher Edition includes “Quick Conference” questions for each written Performance Task that teachers should use with each student at different parts of the writing process. These questions directly connect to the writing step and/or the particular writing focus that students are working on during the process. Additional teacher guidance includes clear essential points with differentiation support notes provided for students who may need substantial or moderate levels of support.
In Grade 7, Unit 5, students complete an informational essay as the written Performance Task.
During the “Take a Closer Look at the Assignment” part of the writing process, the Quick Conference Questions provided for the teacher to use are: “Who is likely to be interested in reading your informational essay? What will your essay describe? What types of evidence will you use? What terms or other information will you need to explain to readers?
During the Pre-Writing and Planning part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “What is the most important idea you want to express about what it means to overcome adversity? How could you make your controlling idea more informative? What topic will you cover in each paragraph? What supporting evidence will you include? How will the conclusion of your essay relate to your central idea?”
During the Drafting part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “What are your readers likely to know about the topic? What information will you need to define or explain? Will you use a formal or informal tone? Why is your choice of tone appropriate? What types of supporting evidence have you used? What additional type could you use? Have you quoted from the selections accurately?”
During the Drafting part of the writing process, materials also include an essential point for teachers to drive students toward: “A coherent essay is one in which ideas progress logically and all of the evidence supports the central idea. Coherence helps readers follow your ideas from the introduction to the conclusion.” The Teacher Edition includes guidance for teachers on what to do should students need differentiation support for drafting, including guidance for students who need substantial or moderate levels of support. Guidance is also provided for extending learning.
During the Revision part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “Which elements of your essay are you focusing on? Can you show me where you revised your draft? Does your introduction grab readers’ attention? How could you improve the clarity of your central idea? Where could you add more supporting details? How could you reorganize these paragraphs so that your ideas flow more logically? What is a more precise word you could substitute for this word?”
During the Editing part of the writing process, the materials provide the teacher with the following Quick Conference questions: “Did you use transition words correctly? Have you checked the spelling of every word that you are unsure of? Have you placed any unnecessary commas with conjunctions and, or, or but?” Have you used this colon correctly?”
The Savvas Realize platform includes rubrics by writing genre (argumentative, informative/explanatory, narrative, and research) in the Writing and Research Center that teachers can use to evaluate Performance Tasks. However, additional guidance on how to use rubrics or have students reflect on their writing after it is scored is not provided.
Indicator 2p.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in all instruction of varied writing processes.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6–8 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in all instruction of varied writing processes. The materials provide some strategies to support MLLs during writing instruction; however, these supports are limited in consistency, depth, and alignment to the academic and linguistic demands of the tasks. While certain scaffolds exist, they do not consistently ensure that MLLs can fully and independently engage in the full range of writing processes at grade level.
For example, in Grade 8, Unit 5, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Nikola Tesla: The Greatest Inventor of All Time” by Vicky Baez. After reading, they complete various activities, including a Writing task. The Writing task prompts students to write “a memorial that captures Nikola Tesla’s life and shares his accomplishments.” The Teacher Facing Notes include some general prompts to support students with writing, such as question prompts and a Monitor and Adjust note suggesting providing a graphic organizer to help students who need it organize their ideas. The materials do not provide a graphic organizer here, just the suggestion to use one. The Teacher Edition includes a Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box for this assignment. For Substantial support, the materials suggest that students “write their drafts in their home language(s) before translating them into English.” For Moderate support, the material suggests teachers “support students in using words from the Word Walls in their writing. Scaffold support of transitions, commas, and semicolons.” For Light support, “Have students work individually. Encourage them to use a print or online dictionary to help them use transitions and then to work with a peer editor to check conventions.” These three levels of support are not tailored consistently to the writing task itself, focusing vocabulary in each to various degrees without including language models or structured frames that guide MLLs in how to use transitions, introduce anecdotes, or provide a conclusion, all of which are required for this assignment. These omissions limit the effectiveness of support, particularly for students developing academic writing in a second language.
This lack of directly connected support for writing skills also occurs during written Performance Tasks. In Grade 6, Unit 1, the written Performance Task assigns students to write a detailed personal narrative, yet the materials lack specific supports for MLLs to understand and produce narrative structures. There is some guidance for MLLs provided for some aspects of this task, including support for writing a detailed opening dialogue, subject-verb agreement, and spelling. While supports for the writing assignment retain appropriate rigor, the instructional materials offer minimal guidance to scaffold language development around sequencing events, using descriptive details, or formatting dialogue—key skills that MLLs must master to fully engage in narrative writing. The materials sometimes suggest associated peer or group work but do not include embedded language development goals or structured opportunities to practice relevant language in speaking and writing.
The instructional design assumes that all students, including MLLs, can access writing tasks without a consistent, intentional approach to language scaffolding. The few supports that do exist are often general (e.g., sentence starters) and are not clearly aligned to the grade-level writing demands, such as building claims in argument writing or integrating text evidence in analysis. The lack of more advanced scaffolds limits students’ ability to internalize and replicate complex academic writing structures.
The materials consistently expect students to follow a structured writing process (prewriting, drafting, revising, and editing). However, the accompanying language support for MLLs during these stages is inconsistent. In some cases, teachers are encouraged to monitor student understanding or clarify instructions, but there is little explicit guidance on how to scaffold grammar, syntax, or genre-specific discourse to support full MLL participation. As a result, students may struggle to understand the expectations of writing tasks or lack the academic language needed to successfully complete them. These missed opportunities undermine the goal of equitable access to writing tasks.
While the materials include some attempts to support MLLs during writing instruction, these supports are often too general, inconsistently applied, and insufficiently aligned to the specific demands of grade-level writing tasks. The lack of targeted language scaffolds—particularly those embedded within each stage of the writing process—limits MLLs’ ability to fully engage in and succeed with complex academic writing.
Indicator 2q
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice the writing processes using evidence-based strategies, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit.
The opportunities for students to practice the writing processes using evidence-based strategies in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2q. The curriculum provides multiple opportunities for students to plan, draft, revise, edit, and publish their writing, all directly tied to the texts and themes they study throughout each unit. Each Performance Task includes a structured pre-writing and planning phase, often incorporating graphic organizers to help students develop their ideas. Students engage in drafting while revisiting Mentor Texts with guiding annotations. The curriculum includes intentional revision and editing steps, where students refine their work using checklists and targeted grammar lessons. Additionally, students use technology to produce and publish their writing, with options such as digital anthologies to present their work. All Performance Tasks in the materials are completed over several instructional days, ensuring that students have ample time to complete all stages of the writing process. This structured writing process ensures students develop grade-appropriate writing strategies across various genres.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to plan writing (e.g., with graphic organizers).
Students have the opportunity to plan their writing for each written performance task and performance-based assessment in the myPerspectives curriculum. While students have opportunities to plan for both types of assignments, they follow a more intentional planning process for Performance Tasks since the Performance-Based Assessment is an assessment.
In Grade 6, Unit 3, students write an argumentative essay to the prompt “Do mobile devices improve our lives?” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of argumentative essays, referring back to the Mentor Text, and taking a close look at the assignment, students complete their pre-writing and planning. First, students free-write to capture some of their ideas. Then, they complete an organizer to plan key parts of their essays, including their claims, counterclaims, and plans for essay structure.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to draft their writing.
For each written Performance Task and Performance-Based Assessment in the myPerspectives curriculum, students have the opportunity to draft their writing.
In Grade 7, Unit 1, students write a personal narrative to the prompt “What experience helped you see how people from different generations help each other?” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of personal narratives, referring back to the Mentor Text, taking a close look at the assignment, and completing the pre-writing and planning, students begin to draft their narratives. As part of the drafting process, students review and discuss the Mentor Text again with guiding annotations and questions. Then, students begin to write. Embedded in the materials is a Coherence and Craft portion of the drafting assignment. For this task, students learn about coherent writing and how pronoun-antecedent agreement supports this goal. Then, they continue drafting, applying the accurate pronoun-antecedent agreement to their narratives.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to revise and edit their writing with grade-appropriate strategies and tools.
Students have the opportunity to revise and edit their writing for each written performance task and performance-based assessment in the myPerspectives curriculum. While students have opportunities to revise and edit for both types of assignments, they follow a more intentional revision process for Performance Tasks since the Performance-Based Assessment is an assessment.
In Grade 8, Unit 4, students write a research paper to the prompt “Write a research paper in which you answer a focused question about the following topic: a specific discovery that demonstrated the power of the human mind and changed the world” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of research writing, referring back to the Mentor Text, taking a close look at the assignment, completing the pre-writing and planning, and drafting their papers, students complete the revision step. During this step, students review and discuss the Mentor Text again with guiding annotations and questions in an activity titled “Read Like a Writer.” Then, students use a checklist to revise their drafts. After revision, students move to the editing step. During this step, students review and discuss the Mentor Text again with guiding annotations and questions in an activity titled “Read Like a Writer,” this time focusing on sentence-level writing. For this assignment, students learn about sentence fragments, practice fixing fragments in a sample paragraph, and then edit their own sentences in their research paper drafts.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to use technology to produce and publish writing.
For each written Performance Task in the myPerspectives curriculum, students have the opportunity to use technology to produce and publish their writing.
In Grade 7, Unit 5, students write an informational essay to the prompt “What does it mean to overcome adversary?” as a written Performance Task. After considering the elements of informational essays, referring back to the Mentor Text, taking a close look at the assignment, completing the pre-writing and planning, drafting their papers, and revising and editing their essays, students complete the publishing and presenting step. Students are presented with two options:
“Option 1: Work with your classmates to publish your essays in a digital anthology. Include visuals, formatting, and graphics—such as headings, diagrams, maps, or captioned images–to emphasize important points.
Option 2: With a classmate, produce a podcast. Take turns briefly introducing each other and reading your essays. End the podcast with a conversation in which you compare the central ideas of the two essays.”
While these opportunities are present for all written performance tasks, the Teacher Edition does not provide sufficient instructional guidance on how to support students in completing them, some of which require specific technological knowledge. The Media Studio section of the Savvas Realize platform includes mini-lessons on technology to complete various assignments. The use of these mini-lessons is up to the teacher's discretion.
Indicator 2q.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit), citing textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly and implicitly.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6-8 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in opportunities to practice the writing process using evidence-based strategies, embedded in what students are studying throughout the unit. The materials provide some strategies to support MLLs during writing instruction; however, these supports are limited and inconsistent.
The materials include some differentiated support for MLLs within writing assignments; however, this support is limited in scope and does not extend to the full writing process. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 1, after reading “My Achilles Meal,” students are asked to write a personal narrative following a sequence of events in chronological order, incorporating dialogue, including descriptive details, and maintaining a consistent first-person point of view. The Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition suggests that “Students may wish to blend languages in their own narratives, as in ‘My Achilles’ Meal,’” followed by supports for Substantial, Moderate, and Light needs. Each level guides teachers to support students in the inclusion of their home language in their personal narratives. No additional MLL supports are provided with this assignment, leaving MLLs without guidance for the writing process or support to complete the assignment in its entirety.
Similarly, in Grade 7, Unit 5, the written Performance Task is an Informational Essay. The materials provide three Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out boxes in the Teacher Edition. Two focus solely on grammar and conventions without directly supporting the writing process. The third directs teachers to “Help students plan their essays by providing graphic organizers, such as concept maps, or cause-and-effect charts. Provide an outline template as well. Explain that a well-developed outline will help them write a strong essay.” Specifics for Substantial, Moderate, and Light supports follow. While this support facilitates MLLs’ full and complete participation in the Planning and Prewriting step of the writing process, the materials leave MLLs without guidance for the rest of the writing process.
While the materials include some instructional supports for MLLs within the writing process, they are limited in scope and inconsistently applied across writing tasks. In some cases, the materials provide differentiated guidance for one step in the writing process, but lack supports throughout the whole writing process. As a result, MLLs do not receive the comprehensive scaffolds needed to successfully practice the writing process from start to finish.
Indicator 2r
Materials include frequent opportunities for students to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit), citing textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly and implicitly.
The evidence-based writing opportunities in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2r. The materials provide frequent and varied writing opportunities that require students to cite textual evidence to support both explicit analysis and inferences. After each text, students engage in a range of tasks—such as writing assignments, analysis activities, and language and craft work—that ask them to make and support claims using textual details. Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments in explanatory and argumentative genres further strengthen these skills by guiding students to develop central ideas and support them with relevant evidence and thoughtful analysis.
Materials provide frequent writing opportunities that require students to cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. Materials provide frequent writing opportunities focused on students’ analyses and claims, which are developed by reading closely and working with texts and sources to provide supporting evidence.
Throughout the myPerspectives program, students regularly engage in activities that build their ability to cite textual evidence, make inferences, and construct and support original claims. After each text, students complete a range of tasks—including analysis and interpretation activities, language and craft analysis, and writing assignments—that require them to analyze the text, cite evidence, and apply evidence-based reasoning. Additionally, Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments in explanatory and argumentative writing further reinforce these skills, guiding students to develop clear claims, integrate relevant textual evidence, and strengthen their arguments through thoughtful analysis.
In Grade 6, Unit 5, students complete a Performance-Based Assessment in which they write a Research-Based Essay responding to the prompt, “Write a research-based essay in which you bring together the information you have gathered from the selections and activities in this unit and your own ideas to answer the essential question: What makes people extraordinary?” In order to complete this assignment, students are required to develop a “central idea that is supported by evidence” from texts they read throughout the unit and use “facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples that develop the topic and support the central idea.”
In Grade 7, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read “The Bee Highway: Making a Place for Bees in the City” by Kathryn Hulicl. After reading, students complete a Writing activity where they write a formal letter to the prompt: “Imagine that your school administration is considering adding rooftop beehives to your school building. Write a formal letter to your principal, expressing your opinion on the matter.” As part of the assignment, students are reminded to “Organize an argument supporting [their] opinion with reasons and evidence from the article and other accurate, credible sources.”
In Grade 8, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read the drama The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. After reading Act II, students complete an Analyze and Interpret activity. This activity includes four sections. First, students re-read dialogue passages from Act II and analyze each character’s motivations, determining whether they are internal or external. Then, students analyze Scene 3, paragraphs 9-50, and explain what the passage reveals about at least three characters. Next, they analyze the decisions the characters make based on the events of that selection. Then, students make inferences about Anne’s motivation to keep a diary. They are reminded to cite at least two details from the play to support their inference and to evaluate if Anne’s diary entries propel the action of the play or serve a separate purpose. Lastly, students answer the question, “What can you infer from the details in Act II about why an informer might be motivated to tell authorities about a family in hiding? Cite at least two details from the play that support your inference.” Later, students complete a Language and Craft activity on dramatic irony. At the end of this activity, students respond to the prompt “Evaluate: What is the overall effect of dramatic irony in the play? Does it enhance your understanding of the play and its historical context? Explain, citing textual evidence.”
Indicator 2r.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit), citing textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly and implicitly.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6–8 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria that materials consistently provide strategies and supports for Multilingual Learners (MLLs) to fully and completely participate in opportunities to practice evidence-based writing (by drawing from the texts and knowledge built throughout the unit) to explain what the text says explicitly and implicitly. While materials include opportunities for students to engage in various modes of writing, including research and analytical writing, the supports provided do not consistently ensure that MLL students can fully and meaningfully participate in these writing tasks alongside their peers.
Some strategies, supports, and accommodations support MLL students’ regular and active participation in speaking, listening, reading, and writing. These include general references to bilingual glossaries, suggestions for extended time, and options for multimodal responses. Additionally, some writing activities provide differentiated support specifically for MLLs. For example, in Grade 8, Unit 3, in the Writer’s Handbook for the written Performance Task, all students revise their drafts using a Checklist for Argument, which asks them to analyze their writing style by ensuring the use of “a variety of sentence types and lengths.” The accompanying Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to “help students revise pairs of related simple sentences” to form compound sentences. The supports focus on revising editorials to ensure varied sentence lengths. MLLs revise pairs of related simple sentences to form compound sentences, with a review of conjunctions such as and, but, so, nor, for, and yet, along with explanations of the relationships between ideas that each conjunction conveys. These scaffolds are described across three levels of support—Substantial, Moderate, and Light—allowing for differentiation based on students’ language proficiency. While the materials provide this grammatical support for MLLs as part of the revision process for this argument writing task, this task lacks any supports for MLLs to cite textual evidence to support their analysis of the text to build the argument needed to reach grade-level expectations of writing an editorial for this performance task.
However, while this example demonstrates intentional support for sentence-level writing development within evidence-based writing, the materials are inconsistent in providing targeted scaffolds across all units. For example, in Grade 6, Unit 5, students are tasked with writing a research paper, and no specific strategies or supports are provided for MLLs. There is no explicit guidance on how to scaffold essential components of the research process, such as analyzing sources, organizing information, or structuring evidence-based writing. Without these task-specific supports, MLL students may struggle to fully access grade-level content and meet the demands of the writing task.
Although the materials provide some general strategies for supporting all learners, many of these are broad and not tailored to specific lessons or academic tasks. Generic suggestions such as sentence frames, peer collaboration, or vocabulary support are frequently recommended, but they do not consistently address the core writing skills needed for MLL students to develop evidence-based arguments or engage with research-based writing. This results in a lack of clarity regarding task expectations and limits students’ ability to demonstrate their learning effectively.
Furthermore, while vocabulary development (e.g., bilingual glossaries, word walls, translation tools) is a common focus, the materials do not consistently extend beyond vocabulary to develop language functions or disciplinary practices tied to writing tasks. Opportunities for building functional academic language, such as synthesizing information, citing textual evidence, and drawing conclusions, are limited, hindering MLL students’ full and complete participation in evidence-based writing assignments.
While materials provide some intentional supports for MLL students, these supports are inconsistent and often limited in scope. Task-specific scaffolds, such as those found in the Writer’s Handbook example, are not applied uniformly across units, leaving gaps in support for complex writing tasks. Stronger alignment between academic writing demands and MLL supports is needed to ensure all students can fully engage in and demonstrate proficiency in evidence-based writing.
Indicator 2s
Materials include explicit instruction of research skills that guide research and writing projects to encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
Materials include research projects to build research skills that lead to mastery of the grade-level standards.
Materials include explicit instruction of research skills that encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The explicit instruction of research skills in myPerspectives partially meets expectations for indicator 2s. The curriculum includes frequent opportunities for research, such as Inquiry and Research tasks, Build Knowledge activities, and longer Research assignments that are connected to the texts students read. While these tasks engage students in researching and analyzing information from multiple sources, the materials provide limited explicit instruction in core research skills. Teacher guidance focuses more on facilitating activities than on teaching research skills. Some Performance Tasks require students to write research papers, and include some targeted instruction and differentiation support. Although the Savvas Realize platform includes optional mini-lessons and student-facing documents on research skills, these resources are still optional and up to the teacher’s discretion.
Materials include research projects to build research skills that lead to mastery of the grade-level standards. Materials include limited explicit instruction of research skills that encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
After reading each text, students complete several tasks. One of these tasks in the myPerspectives program is called Inquiry and Research. This short task requires students to apply the grade-level standards that are related to research skills. Inquiry and Research tasks in the program are directly related to the texts under study, but are not available for every text; however, there are several tasks in each unit. In myPerspectives materials, many of the texts include additional activities titled Build Knowledge and Digital Perspectives. These activities often provide teachers with guidance on how they can support students in facilitating further learning related to the text under study across different topics such as science, social studies, and history. Often, these activities include a research component. The Teacher Edition includes teacher guidance on how to facilitate inquiry and research activities, build knowledge activities, and digital perspectives activities. However, there is limited guidance for specifically teaching students the skills in the standards cited for these activities.
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Peer-Group Learning, students read “Prince Francis” by Roddy Doyle. The Build Knowledge activity included as an option during reading states: “Social Studies: Students don’t often get the chance to read about children fleeing the violence of war, as Francis describes in his fuzzy memories. However, doing so can encourage social and emotional awareness. Allow students to perform brief online research about the Lost Boys of Sudan, the young refugees who fled violence in their homeland and wandered hundreds of miles on their own through the desert to find safety. Have them take notes as they research, and allow them to share the facts they found most surprising and their reactions to learning them.”
In Grade 8, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Brain and Body Benefits: The Case for Playing Video Games.” After reading, students complete several activities, including an Inquiry and Research activity. For this activity, students consider what else they might know about video games and “research the countries with the greatest number of gamers, consumer spending on video games, or another topic” of interest. Teacher guidance states to “Support students as they select a research topic by encouraging them to review the notes about personal connections they made while reading the text. If students made connections on a certain detail or topic, they could use that topic as an entry point into their research.” While the following standards are cited as related to this activity, “conduct short research projects to answer a question” and “gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively” there is no further teacher guidance or explicit instruction on these skills. The Grouping Strategy box in the Teacher Edition provides teachers with options on how to appropriately group students to complete this activity, including small groups, pairs, and independently. The overall guidance for the activity states, “Guide students in identifying a topic and search terms as well as gathering statistics for the Inquiry and Research activity.” Under each type of grouping, the guide provides general guidance on how the teacher should support students. For example, for pairs, guidance states, “Have students work in pairs to identify a research topic, select a source, and gather statistics. Then, have pairs write two sentences explaining what the statistic reveals about video games and gamers. Provide these sentence frames: According to the source, _________. This statistic shows that ____________.”
Another task students complete after reading a few of the texts is called Research. This task is longer than the Inquiry and Research task. For Research tasks, the program requires students to complete research activities such as a research report, etc. Research tasks are present in some units throughout the program. Additionally, some of the Writing Performance Tasks and Performance-Based assessments in the program are Research reports or Research papers. For the Research activities and Performance Tasks, the Teacher Edition includes some explicit instruction on research skills. While present, the instruction is limited.
In Grade 7, Unit 3, Peer-Group Learning, students read “Learning Rewires the Brain” by Alison Pearce Stevens. After reading, students complete several activities, including a Research activity that requires them to write a research report. For this assignment, students must work with their group to “prepare a research report related to text features or information from ‘Learning Rewires the Brain.’” Students choose from two options. Teacher guidance states the following: “Explain that regardless of the option students choose, they will need to conduct research to complete the assignment. Depending on the topic they choose, they will need to consult different types of sources; sources that explain the history of scientific illustrations or sources that explain etymologies.” Additional guidance is about facilitating the activity and reminders to provide for students, such as a reminder on the “proper rules for quoting and citing sources.” There is no further teacher guidance on instruction on explicitly teaching students how to conduct research and evaluate sources.
Students complete a Research Report or Paper as the Writing Performance Task and Performance-Based Assessment in the following units: Grade 6, Unit 5; Grade 7, Unit 4; Grade 8, Unit 4.
In Grade 7, Unit 4, students write a research paper as the written Performance Task on the prompt, “Write a research paper in which you answer a focused research question about the following broad topic: specific ways that humans are trying to solve a problem faced by animals.” The Teacher Edition includes some research and writing guidance throughout the writing process, including references to skills videos from the Skills Center of the platform, which may be helpful to share with students, such as: Primary and Secondary Sources, and Evaluate Sources for Reliability.
For Prewriting and Planning, teacher guidance starts with a focus on the essential point: “Asking questions about your topic will help you begin narrowing the focus of your research.” The guidance includes differentiation considerations for students who may need different levels of support, including substantial, moderate, and light. For moderate support, the guidance states, “Students can rephrase the most promising question as a claim by answering it….If students are unable to convert the question to a claim, they may need to revisit their chosen question.” As students transition to refining their research question, they use a checklist to evaluate its complexity, significance, and scope. Teacher guidance states to review the steps provided in the materials with students and “explain that the final question will serve as the focus as they write. It should be clear and concise.” As students plan, they use a graphic organizer to identify the types of sources they collect evidence from (primary, secondary, or their own research). Teacher Guidance states to “review the three types of sources on the chart. Remind students that a primary source is one that was written by someone with first-hand experience of the topic and that secondary sources are accounts or interpretations based on primary sources. Tell them they may want to conduct their own research, which is a way of creating primary sources.” Next, students evaluate their sources for relevance, accuracy, and credibility. Teacher guidance is focused on the essential point that “It’s important to evaluate sources to ensure that they are relevant, accurate, and credible. You should generally avoid sources that do not have these characteristics because they may lead readers to doubt the accuracy of the information in your paper.” The guidance includes differentiation considerations for students who may need different levels of support, including substantial, moderate, and light. For substantial support, the guidance states, “Support students who may need help determining the difference between a relevant, accurate, credible source and an unreliable source by conducting a think-aloud showing how you compare them against part of the guidelines. Then, have students complete the rest of the comparison on their own.” A sample think-aloud is not provided in the materials.
On the Savvas Realize Platform, mini-lessons on research skills and documents on research topics (such as Conducting Research, Reviewing Research Findings, Incorporating Research Into Writing, and MLA Style for Listing Sources) for student use are included in the Writing and Research Center, found in the Skills Center. Teacher Edition provides some guidance on when and how to use them in collaboration with each unit’s specific learning. The Digital Resources to Customize section at the beginning of each unit lists optional resources that teachers may use throughout the unit to support student learning. At times, research mini-lessons and videos are referenced there. These resources are still optional and up to the teacher’s discretion.
Indicator 2s.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in explicit instruction of research skills that guide research and writing projects to encourage students to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic using multiple texts and source materials.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6–8 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in the explicit instruction of research skills that guide research and writing projects to develop students’ knowledge using multiple texts and source materials. While the program includes tasks aligned with research instruction, support for MLLs is limited, inconsistently applied, and does not fully meet the linguistic needs required to engage in and complete rigorous research-based tasks.
The materials offer some models and protocols for research instruction; however, they do not consistently consider the specific scaffolds needed by MLLs. The materials give teachers general guidance for facilitating research projects and assignments, such as steps for inquiry, organizing evidence, and developing presentations. In some cases, students are directed to use digital tools and graphic organizers to plan their research. However, the teacher-facing materials rarely include linguistic scaffolds or structured support plans tailored for MLLs. This makes it difficult for educators to implement research instruction in a way that promotes full MLL participation without developing their own extensive modifications.
For example, in Grade 7, Unit 4, students write a research paper as the written Performance Task on the prompt, “Write a research paper in which you answer a focused research question about the following broad topic: specific ways that humans are trying to solve a problem faced by animals.” The Teacher Edition breaks down the research and writing process into multiple steps, many of which include supports designed explicitly for MLLs. Some of this guidance directly supports MLLs’ full and complete participation in writing their research papers. For example, in Planning and Prewriting, Refine Your Research Question, the Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box in the Teacher Edition guides teachers to “Explain that once students have chosen a general topic, the next step is to refine the topic to formulate a research question.” Detailed guidance on Substantial, Moderate, and Light supports follows. However, the rest of the MLL supports for this performance task emphasize isolated vocabulary, grammar, and translation activities, rather than addressing the language functions required to complete the assignment. Additionally, two steps in the writing process essential to reaching grade-level research standards, gathering and evaluating sources, lack any MLL-specific supports. The general supports provided are limited to helping struggling students determine relevant sources and do not include any linguistic scaffolding or other guidance for teachers on supporting students who understand the concepts but may not be able to access the material.
In addition, many of the texts include additional activities titled Build Knowledge. These activities often provide teachers with guidance on how they can support students in facilitating further learning related to the text under study across different topics such as science, social studies, and history. However, this guidance never mentions MLLs, effectively limiting their access to the activity.
The materials include multiple writing and research-based tasks throughout the program. For instance, the Writing and Research Center offers mini-lessons on grammar and writing-related topics such as active vs. passive voice and argumentative writing skills. These lessons include closed-captioned videos and multiple-choice comprehension checks. While these tools can support general writing development, they do not include language-specific scaffolds or differentiated instruction to meet the varying needs of MLLs. For example, when the materials direct students to identify strong claims or revise sentences, there is limited explicit instruction on how to use academic language or sentence structures to support research-based writing. The focus remains on general language development rather than the specific demands of research.
Where supports are present, they do not go far enough in assisting students in producing the language needed to demonstrate their understanding. There is minimal use of language models or frames that would help MLLs construct research questions, summarize evidence, or write findings using the appropriate academic register. Supports tend to be general, often focused on reading comprehension or writing mechanics rather than on discipline-specific language needed for research synthesis and communication. They are not consistently aligned with the linguistic functions required to conduct and present research, such as arguing a claim, citing sources, or evaluating the credibility of information. Additionally, the materials do not adequately integrate opportunities for students to develop language across all four domains—speaking, listening, reading, and writing—during the research process. While students do engage in writing and sometimes present findings, there are few explicit supports to help MLLs listen for, talk through, or read complex research-related content with appropriate scaffolding. Opportunities to use language collaboratively or reflect on and revise language choices are especially limited.
There are missed opportunities to help students build on new learning through structured revisions of their research and writing. Though research projects often include drafting and editing stages, the materials do not guide teachers in providing feedback that addresses both content understanding and language use for MLLs. Nor are there language-specific checkpoints or strategies to help MLLs monitor their use of academic vocabulary, syntax, or text structure over multiple drafts.
While the materials offer multiple opportunities for students to learn research skills, they lack the consistent, targeted scaffolding needed for MLLs to fully engage in and demonstrate understanding through integrated speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The absence of explicit support for language production and the coordinated use of all four language domains limits MLLs’ ability to access and benefit from research instruction on par with their peers.
Indicator 2t
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions for further research and investigation.
Materials provide opportunities for students to gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, use search terms effectively, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.
Materials provide opportunities for students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
The opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2t. The curriculum provides multiple opportunities for students to conduct short research projects that are closely connected to the texts and topics of study within each unit. Through Inquiry and Research tasks, students explore related themes by generating questions, gathering information from multiple sources, and refining their research focus. These tasks deepen students’ understanding of unit content while reinforcing research skills such as evaluating sources, using search terms effectively, and citing evidence. While not included after every text, these tasks occur regularly. Various tasks guide students to use search terms effectively, evaluate the credibility of sources, and cite evidence properly, including Research Reports, some Performance Tasks, and some Performance-Based Assessments. Additionally, while all skills are present throughout the curriculum, some skills are covered more than others. Some research assignments also encourage students to draw on both literary and informational texts to support analysis and reflection aligned to the unit’s essential questions and themes. This integrated approach helps students build meaningful research skills while engaging with the curriculum’s core topics.
Materials include multiple opportunities for students to conduct short research projects to answer a question, drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions for further research and investigation.
The Inquiry and Research activities that students complete after reading some texts provide opportunities for students to conduct short research projects to answer a question, draw on several sources, and generate additional related questions.
In Grade 6, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Bad Boy by Walter Dean Myers. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task states, “This excerpt from Bad Boy is set in Harlem, New York, in the late 1940s or early 1950s. What would you like to learn about this setting? Generate two additional questions to guide your research, consult several online sources, and refocus your inquiry as needed.”
In Grade 7, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Dark They Were, and Golden-Eyed” by Ray Bradbury. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task requires students to “Write down two details about Mars from the story. Using these details, generate two of your own questions about what Mars is really like. Then, conduct research to answer your questions.”
Materials provide opportunities for students to gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, use search terms effectively, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation.
Some of the Research and Inquiry activities that students complete after reading some texts provide opportunities for students to gather relevant information from multiple sources, use search terms effectively, and assess the credibility and accuracy of each source.
In Grade 6, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Horses as Healers Around the World” by Carolyn Cory Scoppettone. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task requires students to “perform a brief online search to find answers to [their] questions” on therapeutic riding, horse behavior, or another detail from the article. The prompt continues, “As you work, evaluate each print or digital source you find to be sure that it’s relevant, or related to, your research focus.”
In Grade 7, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task states, “How historically accurate is the Cratchit family dinner scene? Conduct short online research to answer this question. Be sure to use effective search terms that will give you relevant results. For instance, you could enter ‘Christmas dinner in Victorian England’ into a search engine. Consult several reliable sources and take notes. Share your findings with a partner. Discuss how the fictional portrayal of the holiday meal compares with historical accounts. Does Dickens stay true to history or alter it in some way?”
The Research Essays and reports that students complete as written Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments in a unit in the program provide students with the opportunity to assess the credibility of sources, quote and paraphrase, avoid plagiarism, and use proper citations. Additional longer Research activities that students complete after reading a few texts in the materials also provide them with opportunities to practice some of these skills.
In Grade 7, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Silent Spring by Rachel Carson. After reading, they complete several tasks, including a Research task. For this task, students must complete a research report about one of two topics: “the importance of Silent Spring and the impact it had” or “the struggle to ban DDT and the ban’s eventual victory.” In order to complete the report, students must generate questions and examine sources for credibility. Then, they follow steps to paraphrase, quote, and cite sources so that they use their source materials ethically and avoid plagiarism. Part of this includes following a “format for citation provided by [their] teacher.”
In Grade 8, Unit 4, students write a research paper on the broad topic of “a specific human discovery that demonstrated the power of the human mind and changed the world” as the unit’s written Performance Task. In order to successfully complete this task, students identify and gather a variety of sources and must evaluate those sources for credibility, reliability, and bias. After drafting, materials remind students about when a citation is (direct quote, paraphrase, or summary of someone else’s idea) and is not needed (common knowledge, one’s own ideas). After editing, students must create a works cited list using MLA style.
Materials provide opportunities for students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
Some of the Research and Inquiry activities that students complete after reading some texts provide opportunities for students to draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. These opportunities allow students to build more knowledge of the topics of study in the unit. Additional, longer Research activities that students complete after reading a few texts in the materials also provide them with opportunities to practice some of these skills.
In Grade 6, Unit 3, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Cinder by Marissa Meyer. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task states, “Cinder is based on the Cinderella folktale, which has existed since ancient times in many versions from different cultures. Conduct Internet research to find another version of the Cinderella tale. Write down similarities and differences between Cinder and the version you found.”
In Grade 8, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read a selection from the drama adaptation of Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, written by David Rogers. After reading, they complete several tasks, including an Inquiry and Research task. This task states, “The dramatic scene that you just read is from only one of the many adaptations of the novel Flowers for Algernon. Conduct brief research to learn about other adaptations. Write a short summary of your findings.”
Some research-based Performance-Based Assessments in the program require students to write a research-based essay using texts from the unit, including literary and informational texts.
In Grade 8, Unit 4, students use the texts from the unit to write a research-based essay on the unit’s essential question: “In what different ways can people be intelligent?” The texts in this unit include a short story, a drama, a memoir, an article, a video, and an infographic.
Indicator 2t.MLL
Materials provide support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities for students to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of topics.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grades 6–8 of myPerspectives partially meet the criteria of providing support for Multilingual Learners’ (MLLs’) full and complete participation in opportunities to apply research skills to develop knowledge of a topic by confronting and analyzing different aspects of a topic. The materials include lessons and tasks that ask students to apply their research skills, but support for MLLs is limited and inconsistently applied, limiting MLLs’ opportunities to apply research skills to develop their knowledge of topics.
While the materials provide MLL supports for participation in applying research skills, they do not sufficiently support students in completing the full scope of the task. For example, in Grade 7, Unit 4, Whole-Class Learning, students read an excerpt from Silent Spring and complete a research task. In order to complete the report, students must generate questions and examine sources for credibility. Then, they follow steps to paraphrase, quote, and cite sources so that they use their source materials ethically and avoid plagiarism. The accompanying Differentiate - Multilingual Learners call-out box directs teachers to “help students use your support and that of peers to develop background knowledge that will help them generate questions for their research and comprehend challenging language.” Leveled supports follow to prompt or strengthen background knowledge, but do not include guidance to support MLLs in generating research questions:
Substantial: Provide visuals related to the effects of DDT on the environment and use them to elicit or develop background knowledge. Preteach unfamiliar words that students are likely to encounter in their research, such as environment, pesticide, harmful, and ban. Have students share what they know, filling in meanings as needed.
Moderate: Provide visuals that show the effects of DDT. Have small groups researching the same topic refer to them while discussing background knowledge. As they begin research, have them note new terms and work together and with you to define them.
Light: Have students researching the same topic share background knowledge with partners. Provide visuals for them to refer to if possible. Have them discuss how their background knowledge relates to the research topic.
Activating background knowledge is an essential scaffold for MLLs. However, this is the only MLL support provided for this research task. The materials do not provide guidance for teachers on differentiating the core steps in the process:
Conduct Research, which has students generate questions and examine sources,
Paraphrase, Quote, and Cite Sources, which consists of a series of steps to use sources ethically.
Furthermore, many of the texts in the program include additional activities titled Build Knowledge. These activities often provide teachers with guidance on how they can support students in facilitating further learning related to the text under study across different topics such as science, social studies, and history. However, this guidance never includes differentiation considerations, nor does it mention MLLs.
While the program includes research tasks and some supports for background knowledge, support for MLLs’ full and complete participation in opportunities to apply research skills to develop their knowledge of topics is limited and inconsistently applied.
Indicator 2u
Materials include formative assessments and guidance that provide the teacher with information for instructional next steps.
Materials include formative assessments and support for the teacher in determining students’ current skills/level of understanding.
Materials include guidance that supports the teacher in making instructional adjustments to increase student progress.
The formative assessments and teacher guidance on formative assessments in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2u. The myPerspectives curriculum includes frequent formative assessments and support for teachers in monitoring student progress and skill development. During and after reading, students complete tasks such as Comprehension Checks, Reading Strategy questions, Close-Read responses, and Build Insight questions, all of which function as formative assessments. The Teacher Edition provides sample responses, allowing teachers to assess student understanding in real time. Additional formative assessments include Selection Tests and Exit Tickets. Data from these assessments populate reports that help teachers track mastery by standard and make instructional adjustments. Reteach and Practice resources are also available and aligned to Exit Tickets, offering targeted support with answer keys and sample responses, enabling teachers to address skill gaps effectively.
Materials include formative assessments and support for the teacher in determining students’ current skills/level of understanding.
Most of the tasks students complete throughout the myPerspectives program serve as formative assessments, allowing the teacher to determine students’ current level of skills or understanding.
During reading, Comprehension Checks, Reading Strategy questions, and Close-Read Response questions allow teachers to assess how well students understand each core text. The Teacher Edition provides sample responses to these questions.
After reading, other tasks, including Build Insight Questions (including First Thoughts, Summary, and Analysis), provide more opportunities to assess student understanding and skills. The Teacher Edition includes sample responses for analysis questions.
Selection Tests for each text provide an additional opportunity for teachers to determine student understanding and skills. These tests are multiple-choice and consist of Comprehension questions, Vocabulary Questions, and analyze-the-text questions. Each Selection Test answer key provides the teachers with the objective of the question.
In Grade 6, Unit 5, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Eyes Looking to the Sky” by Christopher Hallman. After reading, they complete several tasks, including a Selection Test consisting of ten multiple-choice questions, such as the Concept Vocabulary Question “If you are the navigator in a car, which of the following must be true?” and the Analyze the Text Question “In ‘Eyes Looking to the Sky,’ how do others react to Makani’s father’s actions during the storm?” The Answer key provides the answers.
After reading, each text in the program includes multiple exit tickets so that teachers can assess student skills. Exit tickets are quick skills assessments in a multiple-choice format. They are present following some of the tasks included after each text and vary in focus, including assessing a general concept, word knowledge, and grammar skills. Each Teacher Resource provided for each Exit Ticket includes a PowerPoint presentation.
In Grade 7, Unit 1, Whole-Class Learning, students read “Don’t Just Sit There Link a Punk” by Matt de la Peña. After reading, students complete various tasks and materials, including three exit tickets connected to the concepts and skills covered in some of these tasks. Exit Tickets include an Exit Ticket on theme, an Exit Ticket on the Latin Suffix -able, and an Exit Ticket on Nouns and Pronouns.
Materials include guidance that supports the teacher in making instructional adjustments to increase student progress.
Student responses on Selection Tests and Exit Tickets populate the Data section, which teachers can use to monitor student progress and growth. Reports include class mastery by standard, student mastery, average mastery, standard item analysis, student progress, and usage by student.
Teacher Resources for Exit Tickets include a Reteach and Practice assignment that teachers can assign to students who need more practice, based on the Exit Ticket results. These assignments include isolated skills practice. Each Reteach and Practice assignment includes an Answer Key.
In Grade 8, Unit 2, Whole-Class Learning, students read the drama The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett. After reading Act I, students complete various tasks, including an Exit Ticket on Dramatic Speeches. A Reteach and Practice assignment is included that teachers can use with students who need more practice based on the Exit Ticket results. The reteach assignment includes information on Dramatic Speeches (including dialogue, soliloquy, and dramatic irony), a summary of a play, and three short-response questions, including “Imagine that Ana delivers her soliloquy before Pedro enters. What dramatic irony when Pedro enters the stage, and Ana finally faces him?” The Teacher Resource includes sample student responses to all questions.
Indicator 2v
Materials include culminating tasks/summative assessments that require students to demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit/module while integrating multiple literacy skills (e.g., a combination of reading, writing, speaking, and listening).
Culminating tasks/summative assessments are evident in each unit/module and align to the unit’s/module’s topic or theme.
Culminating tasks/summative assessments provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit/module while integrating multiple literacy skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening).
Materials provide opportunities to support students in gaining the knowledge and skills needed to complete the culminating tasks/summative assessments.
Materials include guidance that supports the teacher in determining and evaluating student performance on the culminating tasks/summative assessments in the program.
The culminating/summative assessments in myPerspectives meet expectations for indicator 2v. The program includes multiple culminating tasks and summative assessments in each unit aligned to the unit’s topic/theme or essential question. These include Performance Tasks, Unit Projects, Performance-Based Assessments, and Unit Tests, each offering students opportunities to demonstrate the knowledge and skills developed throughout the unit. Performance Tasks integrate reading, writing, speaking, and listening skills, while Unit Projects encourage creative application of learning, and Unit Tests assess ELA concepts and standards. Written Tasks are scaffolded and supported throughout the unit with instruction, skill development, and the use of Mentor Texts, preparing students for success. While the program includes progress monitoring tools and genre-specific rubrics for writing tasks, it offers limited rubric-based guidance for evaluating Unit Projects. The teacher guidance for determining and evaluating student performance on summative assessments is generally broad. While tools are provided for most assessments, the materials do not provide guidance on effectively using these tools.
Culminating tasks/summative assessments are evident in each unit/module and align to the unit’s/module’s topic or theme. Culminating tasks/summative assessments provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the unit/module while integrating multiple literacy skills (reading, writing, speaking, listening).
Each unit in the myPerspectives program contains several culminating tasks/summative assessments. Culminating tasks include two Performance Tasks, a Unit Project, and a Performance-Based Assessment, and summative assessments include Unit Tests. Performance Tasks, Unit Projects, and Performance-Based Assessments align with each unit's topic or theme and are designed for students to exhibit both the knowledge and skills they’ve gained throughout the unit. Unit Tests solely align with the unit’s skills and ELA concepts.
The design of the culminating tasks/assessments in the program varies. Performance Tasks follow the end of Whole-Class Learning and Peer-Group Learning, respectively. While the first Performance Task in a unit is a written process-based writing piece, the second is a Speaking and listening activity completed in groups. Performance-based assessments are independently completed process-based writing pieces focused on each unit’s essential question. Unit Projects provide students with choices and, therefore, vary in their structure. Unit Tests are multiple-choice assessments focused on ELA concepts and skills like reading comprehension, word study, and conventions.
In Grade 6, students complete Unit 4, Imagined Worlds, with the essential question, “How does imagination enrich our lives?” Throughout the Whole-Class Learning portion of the unit, students read a play adaptation of A Wrinkle in Time by John Glore. Following Whole-Class Learning, students complete the written Performance Task where they are to write a short story to the prompt, “Write a short story that centers one or more of the characters from A Wrinkle in Time.” To complete this task, students must integrate both reading and writing skills. For Peer-Group Learning, students read three types of texts set in imagined worlds (a folktale, a narrative poem, and a science fiction short story). Following Peer-Group Learning, students complete the Speaking and Listening Performance Task to the prompt, “You have read selections set in imagined worlds that can teach us about ourselves and our real world. With your group, write and present a short story in which a character uses their imagination to solve a problem, to help others, or to make the world a better place. Invent a character or write a new adventure for a character from this section of the unit.” To complete this task, students must integrate reading, writing, speaking and listening skills. For Independent Learning, students must choose one of five texts and text-set options to read and analyze. Following Independent Learning, students develop their Unit Project. The Unit Project for this unit presents students with the option of writing a movie pitch, writing a diary entry, or creating an illustration. All three options require that students focus on a selection or character from the unit. After completing the Unit Project, students complete the Performance-Based Assessment to the prompt, “Imagine that one of the characters from this unit has found their way into the real world. What might happen? Reflect on the essential question, and then write a short story in which you explore how this character’s imagination helps them in the real world and what other characters might learn about the benefits of imagination.” To complete this task, students must integrate both reading and writing skills. After completing the Performance-Based Assessment, students complete the Unit Test, which includes 25 multiple-choice questions focused on various skills and concepts students learned throughout the unit, such as theme, conflict, dramatic structure (characters, dialogue, stage directions), context clues, and verb tenses.
Additional assessments in the myPerspectives program include multiple-choice assessments at the beginning, middle, and end of the year. These tests assess reading comprehension, vocabulary, and conventions skills.
Materials provide opportunities to support students in gaining the knowledge and skills needed to complete the culminating tasks/summative assessments.
Students gain the knowledge and skills throughout each unit to complete culminating tasks/summative assessments.
The materials chunk the assignment into parts for each Performance Task, including instruction and guidance on completing each component.
In Grade 7, Unit 3, students complete a written Performance Task after the Whole-Class Learning component, which involves reading a play adaptation of A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens titled “A Christmas Carol: Scrooge and Marley” and an excerpt from A Christmas Carol. For this task, students must “Write a short story about a character who has a significant life-changing experience. Shape your story to answer this question: Does your character truly change?” The task is chunked into sections comprising the writing process, including planning, prewriting, drafting, revising, editing, and publishing. For each component, materials include instruction, guidance, and reference the unit’s Mentor Text. To complete this assignment, students must grapple with a major theme from the unit reading, change and transformation, which is most embodied by Scrooge’s character. They must apply this knowledge to their own character. Students must also use their understanding of character development, point of view, and theme, which they practiced in the Whole-Class Learning portion of the unit. Last, students must use the academic vocabulary they learned in the unit.
To complete each Performance-Based Assessment, students must consider the knowledge they gained from the selections throughout the unit and solidify their own perspectives on the unit’s essential question.
In Grade 8, Unit 4, the Performance-Based Assessment requires students to write “a research-based essay using the selections in this unit as your reference sources. In your essay, present an answer to the Essential Question: In what different ways can people be intelligent?” Students should use the Evidence Logs they completed after reading each text to help them complete this task. Students should apply the skills they learned in the unit’s written Performance Task, where they wrote a Research Paper, to this research-based essay.
To complete each Unit Test, students must apply the reading comprehension, word study, vocabulary, and conventions skills they developed throughout the unit.
To complete each Unit Project, students must consider all the learning from the unit and apply it in a creative context.
Materials include broad guidance that supports the teacher in determining and evaluating student performance on the culminating tasks/summative assessments in the program.
The Data section on the Savvas Realize platform populates with Unit Tests and beginning, mid, and end-of-year assessments, which teachers can use to monitor student progress and growth. Reports include class mastery by standard, student mastery, average mastery, standard item analysis, student progress, and usage by student.
Each Unit Test and beginning, mid, and end-of-year assessment includes a Reinforcement Resource for the Teacher. This resource “lists the Student Edition page on which the skill assessed is taught, as well as supporting reinforcement resources.” This resource provides the following guidance to teachers: “As warranted by student results, you may wish to revisit the Student Edition lesson or assign the reinforcement resource(s) listed.” For students who take Unit Tests online, Reinforcement is automatically assigned based on their results.
The Writing and Research Center on the platform includes rubrics by writing genre (argumentative, informative/explanatory, narrative, and research) that teachers can use to evaluate Performance Tasks and Performance-Based Assessments. However, additional guidance on using rubrics or having students reflect on their writing after it is scored is not provided.
Unit Projects do not include rubrics to support the teacher in determining and evaluating student performance. Instead, the Teacher Edition includes the following guidance for teachers for unit projects: “You may want to co-author rubrics with students to ensure that their work meets expectations.”